Pages

Monday, October 28, 2024

Cinema Playground Journal 2024: Week 43 (My Cinema Playground)

Multiplex Madness


Conclave
⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre:  Drama
Director:  Edward Berger
Starring:  Ralph Fiennes, Stanley Tucci, John Lithgow, Sergio Castellitto, Isabella Rossellini, Lucian Msamati, Carlos Diehz


Oh, good.  As if American politics weren't stressful enough, now we have to put up with Vatican politics this season.  After the Pope dies of a heart attack, Cardinal Ralph Fiennes organizes a conclave to select his successor.  Tempers are flared, accusations are hurled, and secrets are laid bare as the pressure is on to find the next His Holiness.  Tense with words rather than violence, Conclave is a dramatic tour de force on just about every front.  Fiennes gives his usual 110% performance, locked in with contemplation and conflict.  He and the audience both soak in the traits of individuality within the cardinals who are named, and weighing what they would mean for the Vatican and their faith.  He is backed up by some reliable character actors in Stanley Tucci and John Lithgow, both of which hold their own against him.  The film has a strong, intriguing script as its backbone, and it's difficult to fully guess what it's next move is at any given moment.  That said, it's ending doesn't quite feel like it's a satisfactory resolution to the conflict, centering around a character who is barely present in the narrative until the climax.  There are interesting elements in play with the ending, though some embellishment would have done some heavy lifting in making this movie even better.


The Line
⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Drama
Director:  Ethan Berger
Starring:  Alex Wolff, Lewis Pullman, Halle Bailey, Austin Abrams, Angus Cloud, Bo Mitchell, Denise Richards, Cheri Oteri, Scoot McNairy, John Molkovich


Fraternities are obnoxious, toxic and stupid.  I didn't need this movie to point out the obvious.  And yet, here it is.  This psychological drama sees a rowdy college fraternity go through their annual hazing ritual for freshman pledges as tensions run thick in their ranks, leading to a harsh outcome.  In theory, there is nothing wrong with this movie.  It is made capable enough and has some elements that show promise.  It's just exhausting, witless, and uninteresting.  I understand the movie's slow burn style, though it's dramatic setup to its third act is like wading through sewage as the audience is pummeled with overbearing frat attitudes that feel like caricatures.  The movie feels rowdy in an effort to mask inadequacy and performative in the hopes that it doesn't come off as lifeless.  It fails.  The movie has no pulse.  It's a slog to get to its centerpiece twist, and when it makes it there, it looks clueless as to where to go from here.  It's a plot turn without a plot.  Everything wrapped around it is padding, especially a bland love story subplot between Alex Wolff and Halle Bailey that serves little other than just putting a woman in the movie (other women, Denise Richards and Cheri Oteri, have nothing roles).  It's a movie with a point that tells everything in a pointless way, and I felt like my time with it was thoroughly wasted.


Venom:  The Last Dance
⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Superhero, Action, Horror, Science Fiction, Comedy
Director:  Kelly Marcell
Starring:  Tom Hardy, Chiwatel Ejiofor, Juno Temple, Rhys Ifans, Stephen Graham, Peggy Lu, Clark Backo, Alanna Ubach, Andy Serkis


Oh hey, look, it's a Venom movie.  They make these from time to time, probably.  The Spider-Man fan in me likes seeing the big lug on the screen, though I'd be more excited if the movies were more than goofball noise.  Sony's patented romcom sexual tension approach to Venom did wonders to tone him down to PG-13 while keeping him entertaining, but their failure to grow it from that hasn't been stimulating.  The Venom movies are still the best of the Spider-Man-less Spider-Man universe movies, by a decisive amount.  Though, if I'm being honest, that didn't stop me from enjoying Madame Web the most, which was the biggest knee-slapping chucklefuck of a bad movie any franchise can hope for in a low point.  But if empty calory entertainment is what Sony wants these movies to be, the Venom trilogy does it best.

The latest feature for the Lethal Protector reveals that Venom is the keeper of "the codex" for some convoluted reason that I didn't care enough to pay attention to.  Now he is being hunted by the imprisoned creator of the symbiote, Knull, who sends big alien hunting dogs down to Earth to retrieve it and free him.  The movie has an aimless storyline, seeing Eddie and Venom hiding in Mexico, finding out they're wanted for murder, fleeing to New York because Venom wants to see the Statue of Liberty, and winding up in Nevada because Area 51 is there.  New York is on the other coast, silly!  It's all an excuse to find a new subgenre to latch onto the symbiotic duo.  The first movie was practically a buddy cop movie, the second a breakup romance, and this third one is a road trip.  They have a destination, but they are sidetracked because nothing ever goes right in this type of movie.  Also, Eddie keeps losing his shoes.  Funny, maybe?  You decide.  Like the other Venom movies, the film is diverting and amusing in its high points.  I can't help but feel like it's a regression, as the previous film seemed to have "good movie" on the tip of its lengthy tongue but failed to commit, plunging into a whirlwind of chaos instead.  One does wish they would stay true to what little these movies have going for them in the future, other than doing whatever the hell they did with Morbius.


Your Monster
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Comedy, Romance, Horror
Director:  Caroline Lindy
Starring:  Melissa Barrera, Tommy Dewey, Edmund Donovan, Kayla Foster, Meghann Fahy


Melissa Barrera has distanced herself from the Scream franchise, but it's okay, because she has a new horrific guy in her life.  This dark romcom stars Barrera as a stage actress who has recently gone through a brutal breakup while still accepting a role in a play put on by her douchey ex.  Helping her with her fragile emotional state is the monster who has lived in her closet since she was a little girl, who she might accidentally be falling in love with.  Cutesy and broad, yet addictively silly.  Your Monster takes the traditional Beauty & the Beast narrative and merges it with the story of the prom queen and outcast turn their angsty friction into sexual tension.  The purpose of such a story is more metaphorical than anything, as its never confirmed or denied whether or not Barrera's gothic romance is a psychotic breakdown that's happening in her head (though it's heavily implied that it is if you read between the lines).  The film's psychological read is fascinating, because it's both an analysis of post-breakup anguish and an argument in favoring self-love for healing and using one's resentment and anger as a doorway into it.  Barrera is fabulous in this, drifting in between distrought and feral as each sequence calls for her to do.  By the end, she merges them both into one performance, and it's wonderous to behold.  And I've gone this entire review without referring to Tommy Dewey as "Former Presidential Nominee Thomas Dewey."  I can show some restraint sometimes.

Netflix & Chill


Don't Move
⭐️⭐️1/2
Streaming On:  Netflix
Genre:  Thriller
Director:  Adam Schindler, Brian Netto
Starring:  Kelsey Asbille, Finn Wittrock


A man talks a suicidal woman off of a ledge, but as she tries to thank him, he tries to kidnap her.  She manages to escape, only to be drugged and paralyzed with him closing back on her.  It's interesting that someone would try to make a chase thriller where the chasee can't move, but it's a doorway to sequence creativity.  Don't Move proceeds with enticing scenarios to play up its high concept, though it sometimes feels like it's stalling for time.  The movie isn't quite as snappy as its ninty minute runtime would suggest, as it has long periods where the antagonist is driving and talking to someone who can't talk back, while also lot of its suspense scenes rely on the protagonist sitting in place and waiting for someone to notice that something is wrong.  They're not unsuccessful plot progressions, but the movie is more casual than anything else.  I think Don't Move would have benefitted from beefing up its themes, as its protagonist was a woman contemplating taking her own life caught in a scenario where she is practically waiting to die.  She is unable to contemplate fully, because she can't talk, so the undertones need to work harder than they are.  The film's antagonist is underdeveloped as well, with traits that are generic without giving personality to a man who paralyzes women because it's a thing to do (although I like how he incompetently lashes out at anything that mildly inconveniences him).  Don't Move is diverting, but is stiffened out where it should be nimble.


Woman of the Hour
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Streaming On:  Netflix
Genre:  Drama, Thriller
Director:  Anna Kendrick
Starring:  Anna Kendrick, Daniel Zovatto, Nicolette Robinson, Tony Hale


Twilight and Pitch Perfect starlet Anna Kendrick jumps behind the camera in her directorial debut.  The film depicts the victims of the "Dating Game Killer" Rodney Alcala, a rapist and murderer who happened to appear on the game show The Dating Game in the 1970's.  Kendrick stars in the film as the "lucky bachelorette" who selected Alcala at the end of the episode.  The centerpiece sequence features her flexing her comedic chops on The Dating Game, in a hilarious series of questions that she makes up on the fly that undercut just what a sexist facade the show really was.  While I haven't seen the episode that this movie was based on, I feel like I can say with confidence that this never, ever happened on the show and, if it ever did, the network would have never aired it.  Kendrick has fun with her creative license though, really tearing down one of television's crowning achievements in crap.  She then follows this up with a post-game evening of drinks with Alcala, where her curiosity turns into unease in a slow downturn, which is a fairly strong sequence of its own.  Sometimes the movie struggles with the fact that Alcala's appearance on The Dating Game is fairly removed from his psychotic secret life, since there was very little to tell except he appeared on the show and the bachelorette declined a date with him afterwards.  Kendrick spices that story by using it to express the struggles of victims, especially women, in a society dominated by men who fail to see their suffering.  The movie's strength lies in how well she portrays female oppression and their unease in a sexist surrounding, and often the only people who notice a women's distress are other women.  Kendrick is really, really good with the drama.  The tension sometimes slips her grasp, because she is so focused on the emotional isolation rather than expanding that sense of unease to the audience.  But the movie will pressure an emotional response in most viewers regardless, and Kendrick should be commended for that.

Movies Still Playing At My Theater
Beetlejuice Beetlejuice ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Goodrich ⭐️⭐️1/2
Longlegs ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Piece by Piece ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Saturday Night ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Smile 2 ⭐️⭐️1/2
Terrifier 3 ⭐️⭐️⭐️
We Live in Time ⭐️⭐️1/2
The Wild Robot ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2

New To Digital
Azrael ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Transformers One ⭐️⭐️

New To Physical
Borderlands ⭐️⭐️
Cuckoo ⭐️⭐️1/2
Deadpool & Wolverine ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
In a Violent Nature ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Oddity ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Slingshot ⭐️1/2
Twisters ⭐️⭐️

Coming Soon!

Monday, October 21, 2024

Cinema Playground Journal 2024: Week 42 (My Cinema Playground)

Multiplex Madness


Goodrich
⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre:  Comedy
Director:  Hallie Meyers-Shyer
Starring:  Michael Keaton, Mila Kunis, Carmen Ejogo, Michael Urie, Kevin Pollak, Vivien Lyra Blair, Nico Hiraga, Danny Defarrari, Laura Benanti, Andie MacDowell


Michael Keaton plays an aging art dealer who is struggling to keep his business open while also coming to terms with his second marriage going down the toilet, as well as managing his both adult and grade-school-aged children.  Quite a mouthful to explain, though Goodrich is more about emotional state than plot.  It's a movie about a crisis of change, as Keaton's world shifts around him and it's kind of pissing him off.  He does his best to understand why and tries to keep positive in hopes that he can maintain a semblance of a status quo, while also learning just how much of the issues surrounding him are his fault.  It's a lot of Michael Keaton basically playing a Michael Keaton persona in amusing contemplation, though very little of it is laugh-out-loud funny.  The film's theme seems right on the tip of its tongue.  It struggles to express its own feelings, hoping the audience will get the idea if it runs on its tangent long enough.


Rumours
⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Comedy, Horror
Director:  Guy Madden, Evan Johnson, Galen Johnson
Starring:  Cate Blanchett, Alicia Vikander, Charles Dance, Roy Dupuis, Denis Manchester, Nikki Amuka-Bird, Rolando Ravello, Takehiro Hira


Stop me if you heard this one.  A group of world leaders get lost in the woods.  They argue and find a giant brain.  Oh, you have heard this one?  That honestly frightens me.  Rumours is a bizarre satirical work made so actors can go full theatrical with their scenery chewing while also trying to provide a commentary on the facade of "strength in leadership."  There's probably more on its plate, but I found the film difficult to work with.  It's not very amusing nor is it engaging.  It's a an aimless, goofball attempt at satire.  Distant and drifted off, not particularly interested in impressing anyone, instead pushing quirky abstractness and hoping it works in some manner.  The idea is kinda funny, as we watch a group of world leaders practically wander into an apocalypse and lose both their wits and their minds, but the movie soils itself in trying to outpace the viewer and keep them with their eyebrow raised.  This project feels like someone thought hard about the script they wrote and the movie they created, yet it just fumbles around with nonsense instead of crafting something whole out of it.


Smile 2
⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre:  Horror
Director:  Parker Finn
Starring:  Naomi Scott, Rosemarie DeWitt, Lukas Gage, Miles Gutierrez-Riley, Peter Jacobson, Raúl Costillo, Dylan Gelula, Ray Nicholson, Kyle Gallner


Cards on the table, I firmly believe the original Smile is one of the best horror movies this decade and is probably a contender for an all-time masterpiece, not just of its genre, but in filmmaking period.  I find that movie to be an absolute work of art, crafting a thematic tale of trauma, stress, and anxiety that also manages succeed as a work in its genre, creating those feelings within its audience with ease.  It's amazing how a story that dark could somehow wind up that beautiful.

Flash-forward to Smile 2, because if a horror movie succeeds, that means a franchise is around the corner.  The entity of the previous film has spread to the life of a pop star, who is still recovering from drug addiction and the death of her boyfriend.  As the ghoul haunts her, the outside sees her as having a public meltdown.  Word on the street said this film is just as good as the first one, though I'm inclined to whole-heartedly disagree.  It's bigger, bolder, and more ostentatious than the original, though it's not nearly as unnerving or as pure in its metaphorical expression.  Taking the theme of traumatic reaction and adding substance abuse relapse could be inspired, but winds up undercooked.  There are characters in the story that feel anemic, brought forth as an idea to give the main character something to do, while underwhelming with actual substance behind them as they don't have much meat on their bones.  The original film didn't succumb to this.  It was a film that felt lived in and the people had established and easy-to-understand relationships.  There are characters in this film just tend to exist without context.

The saving grace of Smile 2 is its main star, former Power Ranger Naomi Scott.  Scott is a power player throughout this entire movie and it's very easy to get invested in her performance.  The same can be said for Sosie Bacon, who starred in the first movie, who was benefited from a project that was more fully formed around her.  But if Smile 2 is worth seeing through to the end, it's because Scott is captivating enough to keep this franchise's blood pumping.  Director Parker Finn is also solidifying himself as one of the most effective horror visualists in the industry, willing to not just startle, but jarr and get under your skin.  Effective horror sequences are in less supply compared to the original, though he manages to pull of several exceptional sequences leading toward the climax.  Unfortunately, said climax is a bit of a disappointment, as its twisted in mindgames to the point that it's difficult to really tell what the fuck actually happened.  I'd give it a soft recommend, though horror audiences are more likely to go crazy for it than moderates.  Time will tell if the Smile demon becomes the next Freddy Krueger, but it seems like an unavoidable fate at this point.


We Live in Time
⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre:  Drama
Director:  John Crowley
Starring:  Florence Pugh, Andrew Garfield


Andrew Garfield and Florence Pugh are in love.  Andrew Garfield and Florence Pugh are having a baby.  Florence Pugh is battling cancer while Andrew Garfield supports her.  Now stick it all in a blender and see what comes out.  This love story is told in fragments, chopped up in an editing room and stitched together in little context chunks that unveil as the movie goes on.  It doesn't not work, but it's also hard to care about.  It's like watching a compilation of Lost flashbacks squeezed into a greatest hits reel.  I spent most of the movie trying to figure out what the nonlinear narrative added to it.  The only thing I could figure is that the love story would be basic and uninteresting without it.  Its only selling point would be two appealing leads, who are admittedly both very good in it.  There are worse justifications for a movie's experimentation than "Just because we can," though that doesn't quite mean it succeeds at it.  It's something that just is.  I think I would be further behind this movie if Andrew Garfield had more to do in it, because his role is mostly reactionary.  A lot of stuff happens to Pugh in the story, while he is a bystander that it winds up affecting by default.  If the movie maybe had shifted one of these storylines to him, it could probably even things out.  Instead it's just a story of Pugh weathering a lot of shit and Garfield off to the side trying not to cry.  I think perhaps the point is supposed to be about her impact on his life, whereas I'd be more invested in a movie that shows how they impacted each other.

Movies Still Playing At My Theater
Beetlejuice Beetlejuice ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Deadpool & Wolverine ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
It Ends with Us ⭐️⭐️
The Nightmare Before Christmas ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Piece by Piece ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Saturday Night ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Terrifier 3 ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Transformers One ⭐️⭐️
The Wild Robot ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2

New To Digital
Alien:  Romulus ⭐️⭐️1/2
Bagman ⭐️
Lee ⭐️⭐️1/2
Never Let Go ⭐️⭐️1/2
Reagan ⭐️
The Wild Robot ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2

Coming Soon!

Monday, October 14, 2024

Cinema Playground Journal 2024: Week 41 (My Cinema Playground)

Multiplex Madness


The Apprentice
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Drama
Director:  Ali Abbasi
Starring:  Sebastian Stan, Jeremy Strong, Martin Donovan, Maria Bakalova


The second mainstream biopic of a former President of the United States, though this one is less of a shoddy, dick-riding propaganda piece than the last one.  So much so that Donald Trump actually sought to have the film's released blocked.  I'm not sure there's anything in the film that will soil his "branding," because everything in the film is what any astute person already knows about Donald Trump, whether they admire him or detest him.  It will likely only irritate those under the delusion that Trump is a name of intense moral fiber and devote patriotism, but if you believe that, lol.  The Apprentice, not to be confused with the semi-related reality show, is a story of a bad man who learns he can get away with almost anything he wants when he bends the rules to his own will.  The Apprentice shows Trump in the 1970's being mentored by seedy lawyer Roy Cohn, who teaches him several ruthless rules that Trump takes to heart as he rises in the business world.  Modern day Donald Trump is such a cartoon character of narcissism and bankrupt morality that it's hard to think of him in a grounded way, mostly because its feels like he has always been like this.  It's interesting that The Apprentice actually does manage to humanize him while realistically paving a road to the Donald Trump we know today.  Sebastian Stan is pitch-perfect casting.  His facial expressions and hand gestures are spot-on, and he plays the young and relatively naive Trump and the older and colder Trump with stark effectiveness.  The movie itself can't shake several redundancies about it, feeling like a retooling of Wall Street with slight elements of All About Eve peppered in.  Excellent performances and a well-created character study help it overcome this, making it one to check out if you want a glimmer of an idea of what makes Donald Trump tick.


Piece by Piece
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Drama, Comedy
Director:  Morgan Neville
Starring:  Pharrell Williams


Rapper Pharrell Williams puts together a biographical semi-mockumentary based on his life and career...told entirely in Legos.  It's a fun idea, one that's rich in novelty, while also tumbling over itself on mixing the straight autobiographical with the abstract.  The point is to be exprssionistic with its artistic license, though it's sometimes so far into its own beat that it becomes coasting on vibes.  It's an interesting attempt to step outside-of-the-box documentary, one that encourages imagination and individuality.  It's a message that would resonate with the youngest of Lego enthusiests, though it's not exactly a movie kids will be interested in.  That audience will be more interested in the Legos than the life story, which is probably for the best, seeing how the movie goes through its share of more adult-themed lyrics.  However, the movie's existence is purely for the pleasure of those who made it, and even if never gains an audience, it has already pleased the people who wanted to see it.


Saturday Night
⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre:  Comedy
Director:  Jason Reitman
Starring:  Gabriel LaBelle, Rachel Sennott, Cory Michael Smith, Ella Hunt, Dylan O'Brien, Emily Ferin, Matt Wood, Lamorne Morris, Kim Matula, Finn Wolfhard, Nicholas Braun, Cooper Hoffman, Andrew Barth Feldman, Kaia Gerber, Tommy Dewey, Willem Dafoe, J.K. Simmons


Our third biographical movie in a row, Saturday Night flashes us back to 1975, where young producer Lorne Michaels struggles to put on the premiere of a new live sketch comedy program, which will eventually be known as Saturday Night Live.  Onset, he has to control his rowdy cast, duck the censors, structure the show, and convince executives that he's worth putting on instead of reruns of Johnny Carson.  Saturday Night is a colorful ode to wrangling up rambunctious comedic chaos.  Longtime fans of Saturday Night Live couldn't ask for anything more than that.  SNL is pretty much a fifty year dumpster fire of a TV legacy, and rightfully so if half of this is true.  I'm sure a lot of it is embellished, because it's a lot of chaos to handle in ninty minutes, but even if it is, it works as a tribute to nature of the series it's inspired by.  The cast is excellent, as each member captures the essence of their performer almost as if they are being possessed by their vengeful spirits.  Then there is J.K. Simmons as Milton Berle, which is low-key the most brilliant casting I've seen in any movie all year.  You don't realize how good he's going to be until he's right in front of you.  Those looking for a film that gleefully cherishes the hot mess that inspired it will find a lot to love about Saturday Night.  I, for one, had a blast watching it.


Terrifier 3
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Horror
Director:  Damien Leone
Starring:  David Howard Thornton, Lauren LaVera, Elliott Fullam, Margaret Anne Florence, Bryce Johnson, Antonella Rose, Samantha Scaffidi


As if one movie about a murder clown wasn't enough for this October, now director Damien Leone is back with his Art the Clown character to make heads go splat.  Following where the franchise left off in the second film, Arthur resurrect himself yet again with the help of his crazed mutilated victim from the first film, Victoria.  Five years after their last appearance, Art and Victoria stalk the survivor of the previous film during a bloody Christmas season, carving up anybody in their way.  It's difficult to not get desensitized to any given horror franchise no matter what it has to offer, especially when all it wants to offer is more of the same.  In Terrifier's case, what it's willing to give its audience is even more extreme blood and nastiness.  But when you've already started at the ceiling, how high can you go?  Shock value is nonexistent.  We all know what to expect from Terrifier 3, and if you don't, then you're not seeing Terrifier 3.  However, Terrifier 3's strength lies in what made the other films enjoyable for horror enthusiasts:  it knows what it is, and it loves itself for it.  The original Terrifier is an homage of an underground style of horror film from decades past that few outside the mainstream where most feverish of horror fanatics have gone out of their way to see, such as Blood Feast or Basket Case.  The second and third are indulgent exercises in excess, and if you're not in the mood to watch faces getting kicked in, nether-regions getting chainsawed, or axes getting stuck in people's spines, then there is no point in watching any of them.  It's another Terrifier movie.  Those who seek out any Terrifier movie already know what they want from a Terrifier movie, and they'll get it.  Personally, I think I enjoyed the first one the best, due to its crafty homage.  This one is a little lesser than the second one, even though I found the Christmas setting fresh (albeit pointless), Lauren LaVera played her PTSD storyline with effectiveness, and the rebranding of Victoria as a sidekick villain was fun.  Terrifier 3 also ends with little resolve and a cliffhanger tease, wanting us to be excited for Terrifier 4 instead of giving us a whole movie.  It almost feels like John Wick 3, where we got the action we came for and just ends when it should be beefing up.  Those who saw a third will definitely see a fourth, though.

Movies Still Playing At My Theater
Alien:  Romulus ⭐️⭐️1/2
Beetlejuice Beetlejuice ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Blink ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Deadpool & Wolverine ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
My Old Ass ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Speak No Evil ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Transformers One ⭐️⭐️
White Bird ⭐️⭐️⭐️
The Wild Robot ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2

New To Digital
Beetlejuice Beetlejuice ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2

New To Physical
Kinds of Kindness ⭐️⭐️1/2
MaXXXine ⭐️⭐️1/2
Robot Dreams ⭐️⭐️1/2
Thelma ⭐️⭐️⭐️

Coming Soon!

Monday, October 7, 2024

Cinema Playground Journal 2024: Week 40 (My Cinema Playground)

Multiplex Madness


Blink
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Documentary
Director:  Daniel Roher, Edmund Stenson
Starring:  Édith Lemay, Sébastien Pelletier, Mia Pelletier, Léo Pelletier, Colin Pelletier, Laurent Pelletier


The director of the Oscar-winning documentary Navalny goes for something a little less dark, but steering away from Russian politics in general is likely to achieve that.  This documentary follows the French-Canadian Pelletier family, who has learned that three of their four children have a genetic disease that will cause them to gradually go blind as they age.  Wanting to give their children images to remember, they travel the globe to give them sights to see while they still can.  The movie's lack of a full narrative weighs it down, though not fatally.  A good amount of this movie is devoted to the family acting like a family, with all the moments beautiful and messy that happen along the way.  There are a couple of moments that are filmed that are poignant, such as the youngest child coming to terms with what it means to become blind and struggle to accept it.  There is also a point where they get stuck in a cable car for several hours, where several of the children have a meltdown.  The talking heads try to associate this with the children's fear of going blind, which feels like it's stretching it.  It's more likely that they were upset because they were children stuck in a confined space for an ungodly amount of time.  But the movie is a good-natured and interesting watch, while not exactly as life-affirming as it believes it is.


A Different Man
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Drama
Director:  Aaron Schimberg
Starring:  Sebastian Stan, Renate Reinsve, Adam Pearson


A curious psychological drama sees Sebastian Stan playing a man with neurofibromitosis who undergoes an experimental procedure that makes him look normal, which he then decides to fake his own death and rebuild his life.  Years later, he discovers the former neighbor he longed for has turned his life into a stage play, and he auditions for the lead role.  A Different Man has interesting ambitions, initially presenting itself as the story of a man who is seen as a monster desiring a different life.  As the film goes on, it becomes clear that this isn't the story at all, wishing to analyze personality and how physical alteration doesn't change who you fundamentally are.  That may sound a bit cheesy, but the film's dark presentation allows it to maintain a fresh perspective.  The movie isn't a schmaltzy fell-good inspirational movie, choosing instead to be a psychological mindfuck instead, while also tearing down the tropes of a "Beauty & the Beast" narrative in a pretty savage way.  Stan's introverted character has more light shed on him when Adam Pearson's character comes into the story, who also has neurofibromitosis, yet displays more extroverted traits and seems to achieve many things that Stan could not.  Stan's reactions to this are the theme of the film that has proved evasive so far, providing a mixed reaction to a man that has mastered his life compared to Stan's own internal misery.  The film is a tale of change being skin-deep, but our own demons being the real challenge.  It doesn't have an answer to overcome that challenge, choosing instead to point out that some things just are and that one physical change might not bring the joy you hope for.  Sometimes the gray morality of the film gets in its way, and I find myself hesitant with fully embracing the movie because its message comes dangerously close to being "your mental health is your own fucking fault, you piece of shit," making the movie come off less as tough love than just cruelty.  But it's worth sticking with if its setup intrigues you.


Joker:  Folie à Deux
⭐️1/2
Genre:  Drama, Thriller, Superhero, Musical
Director:  Todd Phillips
Starring:  Joaquin Phoenix, Lady Gaga, Brendan Gleeson, Catherine Keener, Zazie Beetz, Steve Coogan, Harry Lawtey


Joaquin Phoenix reprises his Oscar-winning role (the same role that won Heath Ledger a posthumous Oscar, Jack Nicholson a nomination, and Jared Leto jack squat) in this follow-up, which takes place two years later, where Arthur Fleck is on trial for murder.  He also meets Harleen Quinzel, a fellow patient that he forms a relationship with and ecourages his worst attributes.  To put it quite bluntly, Folie á Deux doesn't work.  I feel miserable saying that, because I think the first one is a very good movie.  A psychological drama about the origin of the Joker, a character who is more compelling when he's not explained, worked better than it should have.  In trying to push its own limits, the sequel winds up breaking itself.  It's a movie that is built on the wrong foundation, fundamentally misunderstanding the character of Harley Quinn and her relationship to the Joker, while also cowering back on the Joker himself, not wanting to tell a story about the Joker but rather his iconography.  The latter probably seems like an idea with temptation, but I'd argue that the character isn't suited for such a story.  Hell, the version of the character introduced in the previous Joker movie isn't suited for it either.

To start on the first point, one thing needs to be immediately clear about Harley Quinn if you're going to try and portray her:  the woman is as much a victim as she is a villain.  She believes she's in love, but the Joker views her as a trophy and not a love interest.  She's what happens when he corrupts a pure soul and breaks it.  The Harley in this movie is a groupie.  She sees the Joker on TV and falls for his image.  Arthur Fleck's incel Joker is excited because she lets him into her pants, and she's the only woman who has ever thought of him sexually.  This is still a toxic romance, but it's toxic in a way that's not true to the characters its portraying.  Building off of this, Arthur Fleck builds back into his Joker persona, but the image of the Joker is proving to be bigger than the man.  Is this a meta commentary on the toxic masculine hero worship that the previous film produced getting away from the filmmakers?  Maybe.  I'm not so sure that the movie is that smart.  If it is, it's an interesting ambition, though it crosses the line so carelessly that it becomes the antithesis to the aspects of that film that are admirable.  The theme doubles down until a misfire of a climax, which is an ending so bad that it just might make the original's biggest fans hate the previous film in retrospect.  But I've never been a fan of that particular take on the Joker in question, which is mostly ripped straight from a bullshit plot turn from the Gotham TV series.  I'm more in tune with the idea of the Joker being a unique being of chaos, rather than a source of inspiration and aspiration for someone else.  The Joker is not one who enjoys sharing the spotlight.

The musical element is dry and tacked on.  The best musicals have a sense of hyper-reality to them, something Folie à Deux tries to commit to by making this aspect something that's happening in Arthur's head rather than what's actually going on in the story.  It seems utterly flummoxed as to how to make it meaningful, though.  Instead, it comes off as something bewildering that barges in on the narrative.  It also doesn't help that Joaquin Phoenix isn't a very good singer.  That might be intentional, because Arthur's not very good at anything he does, so why would he be any better at this?

Part of me wants to say this movie isn't as bad as I'm making it out to be.  After all, it's okay enough for a good long while, and it even starts with a cute little Joker cartoon that emphasizes the movie's attempted theme.  It's a steamroll of irritation though, a movie that gets gradually worse as its ambition gets away from the storytelling.  It's a movie that feels like it was made by people who resent the fact that they were roped into doing a sequel, tossing in experimental ideas in the hope that they can make it interesting, and when they don't work, they botch the climax in retribution.  I entered the theater hopeful and I left it miserable.


Monster Summer
⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Horror, Adventure, Comedy
Director:  David Henrie
Starring:  Mel Gibson, Mason Thames, Julian Lerner, Abby James Witherspoon, Noah Cottrell, Nora Zehetner, Patrick Renna, Lorraine Bracco, Kevin James


Schoolchildren begin popping up in a small town acting differently, and a young boy begins to suspect that there is a witch in the population that is preying upon them.  Monster Summer is an earnest, yet dysfunctional, macabre misfits misadventure throwback, made by someone who probably grew up on The Goonies, The Sandlot, Gremlins, Eerie Indiana, Are You Afraid of the Dark?, the Disney Channel, and a whole lot of Goosebumps books.  If one has fondness for those kinds of rambunctious grade school stories, then Monster Summer is worth spending ninety minutes with.  It even has a decent scare or two, but as far as Scooby-Doo adventures go, there aren't enough jeepers from the creepers.  The movie is a bit of a flat experience, with some crude effects and a mystery that lacks momentum.  Also, Mel Gibson is in this movie for some reason.  I don't know why, and his character only serves to pad out the film and give the kids an adult to talk to.  It's not the best plotted movie, but kids looking for Halloween spookums will probably get a kick out of it.


White Bird
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Drama
Director:  Marc Forster
Starring:  Helen Mirren, Ariella Glaser, Orlando Schwerdt, Bryce Gheiser, Gillian Anderson


I'm not entirely sure why the author of Wonder, a story about a deformed boy fitting in at grade school, looked at it and said "Let's do a Holocaust-themed prequel."  Anyway, I haven't seen nor read Wonder, so maybe this makes more sense to people versed in that rich Wonder lore.  Based on a graphic novel follow-up to a regular novel, White Bird sees Helen Mirren reminiscing with her grandson about escaping Nazis in World War II and hiding in the barn belonging to the family of a crippled boy.  White Bird is a tale of two clashing tones, one of schmaltzy feel-good optimism and the other...Nazis doing the Nazi thing and everything that comes with that.  Zone of Interest and Schindler's List this is not.  It even leans more into theatricality than last year's One Life.  If you desire your Holocaust tales to lack the relentless bleakness and wish them to have hope in them, White Bird isn't a terrible option.  It's melodramatic, sentimental and has strangely absurd third act plot twists, but it's also a warm presentation of a lovely childhood romance set among a dark backdrop.  It's one of those movies where you'll either be focused on its worst aspects or its best, and your opinion will differ based on that glass-half-full mentality.  The audience it's aimed at will likely think of it as a yearly favorite, so stick that in your pipe and smoke it.

Netflix & Chill


'Salem's Lot
⭐️⭐️1/2
Streaming On:  Max
Genre:  Horror
Director:  Gary Dauberman
Starring:  Lewis Pullman, Makenzie Leigh, Alfre Woodard, John Benjamin Hickey, Bill Camp, Jordan Preston Carter, Nicholas Corvetti, Spencer Treat Clark, William Sadler, Pilou Asbæk


Based on the Stephen King novel, which has already been adapted into two previous television miniseries, 'Salem's Lot is a town in Maine that finds itself in the middle of a vampire outbreak.  The movie was filmed years ago, riding the tidal wave of Stephen King adaptations that resulted from It's popularity, but after production, the film almost disappeared into the night.  It was almost believed to be one of Warner Brothers' now infamous "tax write-offs," like Batgirl or Coyote vs. Acme, but was eventually dumped on streaming for Halloween season.  Compared to adaptations that have come before it, this version of 'Salem's Lot is tight, running over an hour shorter than miniseries prior, making it feel hectic.  It's a blessing and a curse, as the original Tobe Hooper version of Salem's Lot has many iconic imagery and scenes in it, but they're interspersed in a narrative that takes forever.  This new film, directed by Annabelle Comes Home director Gary Dauberman, is more fog machine atmosphere than terror, and while it's narratively jumpy, at least it gets to the point.  It's hard to say if seasoned King fanatics will think highly of it, but it's certainly an exorcise in gothic theatrics set to flash and noise.  I find its sillier aspect forgivable in that it keeps them fun.


V/H/S/Beyond
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Streaming On:  Shudder
Genre:  Horror, Anthology
Director:  Jordan Downey, Christian Long, Justin Long, Justin Martinez, Virat Pal, Kate Seigel, Jay Cheel
Starring:  Dane DeLiegro, Alanah Pearce, Mitch Horowitz, Namrata Sheth, Bobby Slaski, Libby Letlow


V/H/S is going for broke in becoming the longest running found footage horror franchise, matching Paranormal Activity's mainline count with this entry.  There is an asterisk next to that depending on whether or not you count Tokyo Night as an actual Paranormal Activity film of if you consider Siren and Kids vs. Aliens to be V/H/S films (those movies are not found footage, so that kinda defeats the purpose).  But if we're talking meat-and-potatoes entries, Shudder's devotion to V/H/S seems to put it on track to taking the crown by next year.  I admitted ignorance to the franchise when I went in blind on V/H/S/85 last year (also Kids vs. Aliens, but I didn't know that was a spin-off when I watched it), but since then I got to work and watched all the other entries in the franchise.  I must say, it's pretty fun (except Viral), though I'll admit I enjoyed the spirit of the first two the most.  Shudder's entries since taking over the franchise don't have the same gung-ho attitude.  V/H/S/Beyond, however, is clearly the best since the second.

V/H/S/Beyond tries to stick the franchise in a sci-fi horror direction, mostly revolving around aliens.  Not all segments commit to the bit, but most of them deal with invaders of some sort.  Instantly recognizable directors are kept to a minimum for Beyond, with the biggest seasoned name being Radio Silence's Justin Martinez, who is unfortunately not a member who collaborated on Radio Silence's best/most well-known features (he helped with Devil's Due and Southbound, rather than Ready or Not, Abigail, or Scream 5 and 6), but he did work on the group's previous V/H/S collaboration in the first movie, and that segment was an anthology highlight.  The best known names of the directing pool are actually actors Justin Long and Kate Siegel, each making their directorial debut here.  Long's segment is a low point, which sees animal rights activists trying to expose a "Doggy Dream House" nanny for animal cruelty only to become trapped by her as pets.  The segment rips its idea straight from Kevin Smith's Tusk, which I'm curious as to whether or not Long realizes this, because he starred in the fucking movie.  The best segments belong to Martinez and Siegel.  The former has a hectic story of a group of friends who are skydiving when an alien invasion hits, which is an energetic hit-and-run chase thriller that goes from the sky, to an orchard, and back into the sky.  Seigel's segment was written by her husband, horror maestro Mike Flanagan (who directed her in Hush, Midnight Mass, and The Haunting of Hill House/Bly Manor), and is the most polished and expertly shot film of the lot.  While the story is slight (a woman hunts UFOs and becomes trapped in one), the visuals Seigel accomplishes can probably be considered some of the finest work in the V/H/S franchise.  Color me impressed.

Remainder segments include a segment about a police group searching a house for missing children, only to be attacked by undead corpses.  It feels very video game inspired, especially by Doom and Resident Evil.  There is also the trademark "mysterious hot girl is actually a terrifying monster" story that the V/H/S franchise has been fucking around with since its very first segment over a decade ago, only this time with a Bollywood flavor.  The wraparound is a paranormal documentary about two VHS tapes that supposedly prove the existence of aliens, which is humdrum until the ending, where the contents of the tapes are actually seen and are suitably unnerving.  If you enjoy the V/H/S franchise, Beyond won't turn you off.  It's arguably the series back in top form.  If nothing else, it's a hint that there is still gas in the tank, making one interested in seeing what Shudder cooks up with this franchise next year.

Movies Still Playing At My Theater
Alien:  Romulus ⭐️⭐️1/2
Azrael ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Beetlejuice Beetlejuice ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Deadpool & Wolverine ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Megalopolis ⭐️⭐️
My Old Ass ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Speak No Evil ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Transformers One ⭐️⭐️
The Wild Robot ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2

New To Digital
The 4:30 Movie ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Blink Twice ⭐️⭐️1/2
Deadpool & Wolverine ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
It Ends with Us ⭐️⭐️
The Killer's Game ⭐️⭐️1/2
Speak No Evil ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Strange Darling ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

Coming Soon!