Monday, December 23, 2024

Cinema Playground Journal 2024: Week 51 (My Cinema Playground)

Multiplex Madness


Homestead
⭐️
Genre:  Thriller, Faith
Director:  Ben Smallbone
Starring:  Neil McDonough, Dawn Olivieri, Susan Misner, Jesse Hutch, Bailey Chase


Angel Studios barely knows how to make faith dramas.  The fact that they also seem to think they know how to make apocalyptic thrillers is honestly really funny.  The last time I saw something comparable from them was last year's multiverse sci-fi The Shift, also starring Neil McDonough.  That did not encourage me to think they should try genre-pushing again.  Homestead is apparently based on a book series called Black Autumn, so maybe Angel is hoping for their own dystopian franchise.  I sincerely hope the books are better than this.

Homestead takes place in the aftermath of some sort of attack on America that...did...things...?  Exactly what happened is kept extremely vague.  The only thing that we directly see is that a boat off the coast explodes and some sort of toxin is released into the air.  After that, the sky turns orange and the power grid goes out.  Apparently, the power thing was something separate, I don't know, but we are delivered exposition clumsily through a family who doesn't know what's going on, but somehow knows exactly what to do in this specific situation as they run to the car screaming "Just don't breathe the air!" (Hint: Your not calming your kids down in a crisis if your survival tip is "Just don't breathe.").  They then load up into a car and hit a button on the dash, as the car's computer says "Bioweapon Defense Mode Activated."  Is this standard issue?  Can all cars do this nowadays?  Am I screwed because I own a used car from twenty years ago?  Seriously, we're not even five minutes into this movie and I've already completely given up on it.  But long-story-short, they travel to Neil McDonough's ranch house, which acts as a safe haven for select families.  But he has to pick and choose who he lets in, while others sit outside the fence and look like lost puppies looking for a home.  It's like watching a stripped down episode of The Walking Dead that's refocusing to appeal to an audience that wants movies to be much fluffier, with more praying and less flesh-eating.

It's not that hard to decipher what the movie wants to do.  It seems like the people making this film want to make a story of community, environmental care, and independence from technology.  Whether or not they understand how much they garbled those messages in static is unknown to me.  It's commentary on crisis desperation is hollow and surface-level, never exploring what it's trying to portray, as all extras come off as mindless wandering NPCs rather than human beings.  The one point the movie threatens to become interesting is when the group is pressured to become more militant to protect what they have and a teenage boy shoots an innocent man, causing him to be overwhelmed with guilt.  The boy's love interest helps share his pain by telling the guilt of having a heart transplant, saying "He died so I can live."  Yeah...um...this isn't the same thing.  Heart transplants aren't taken from randos who are forced onto a table and have their vital organs taken (unless her parents went through the black market for that heart, and if they did, I have questions), they're given by people who died in something totally unreleated and willingly signed off on being an organ donor.  That's about the level of awareness this movie has.  The entire movie is written in this gobsmackingly stupid drone, right down to a climax firefight that happens because some government guy wants guns or taxes or some shit and sicks a police S.W.A.T. team on the ranch, who likely have better things to do during an apocalypse than this.  The movie then swings for the fences with it's faith ending, where the movie clearly thinks it has passed on some sort of powerful message of life.  The only message it succeeds in getting across is how to grift money out of an easy mark of an audience.


Mufasa:  The Lion King
⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre:  Adventure, Musical
Director:  Barry Jenkins
Starring:  Aaron Pierre, Kelvin Harrison Jr., Seth Rogan, Billy Eichner, Tiffany's Boone, Donald Glover, Mads Mikkelsen, Thandiwe Newton, Lennie James, Anika Noni Rose, Blue Ivy Carter, Beyoncé Knowles-Carter


The Circle of Life continues, as should be!  It's not a surprise that we have another Lion King movie.  It always seemed inevitable.  In fact, it's actually surprising that there have only been three theatrical Lion King movies made in the last thirty years, as the rest have been direct to video (or television).  It was a bit of a questionable legacy to what is probably one of the greatest animated films of all time (some might even consider it the greatest), but maybe less is more.  I hardly remember the live action remake, anyway.  I know I've seen it, but when I think of the events of this story, I always think of the original movie.  Seeing it with photorealism was an interesting novelty, but the original was irreplaceable.

Acting as both a sequel and a prequel to the previous film, Mufasa:  The Lion King centers on Rafiki sitting down with Simba and Nala's daughter Kiara, telling her the story of her grandfather, Mufasa, and how he went from a lost lion cub to king of the Pride Lands.  Timon and Pumba are there too, often used as humorous intermission because most children probably aren't interested in a Lion King story that doesn't involve their beloved shtick.  As to whether or not this movie is a more worthwhile investment than the previous remake, this movie contains a few of the same issues I remember having with it, such as more concentration on making the characters look lifelike than lively and dull musical numbers that visiually just offer a bunch of animals frolicking.  As someone who is more intimately familiar with the original film than the remake, I find myself more intrigued about getting a story based on Mufasa as a youngster than a sequel to the last movie.  That story has its ups and downs, but it had more thoughtfulness in it than I was expecting.  There is a serious attempt at making Mufasa's story distinct from Simba's, ensuring that the story isn't just "The Lion King Again" (which is a one-up this movie has on the sequel to Gladiator, anyway).  There is also a lot of heart given to Mufasa's relationship with Taka, who would grow up to become the villainous Scar.  Truth-be-told, I enjoyed the depth they gave Taka in this movie.  Using a recent film for comparison, Taka's journey could have been as hollow as Megatron's in Transformers One, where he starts off as one character and just suddenly switches his entire personality halfway through because the plot demands it.  The Taka that ends this movie is very believable as the same character who starts it, and he's very believable as the same character as Scar in the first Lion King.  It's solid writing.

But there are things that hold it back.  For starters, Mufasa's story isn't as strong as the story told for Simba in the previous film.  There is a slight deflation to this, because Mufasa has always been such a powerful and bold presence, so wise of his knowledge of life.  Mufasa needs a story that feels bigger than Simba's because the character always presented himself as if he was.  A lost lion cub on a journey with an adopted brother doesn't quite feel like that is a story worthy of such a character.  The idea of him forming the Pride Lands might be, but there is a slightness to how this transpires, while it also undermines the "Circle of Life" aspect of the Lion King, which always implied that Mufasa and Simba were never the first kings and they were far from the last.  And finally is Lin-Manuel Miranda's music, which lives in the shadow of Elton John.  Miranda is a talent, and Moana 2 was all the weaker for not having him onboard, but there just isn't the same power to the music in this movie.  It's probably the weakest musical offering I've seen from him, even though the songs are still enjoyable in the moment.  And that's the underlining problem with this movie as a whole:  it's a good effort that is living behind the behemoth of something greater.  But it's hard to overshadow The Lion King, no matter how good your movie is.


Sonic the Hedgehog 3
⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre:  Comedy, Superhero, Adventure, Action
Director:  Jeff Fowler
Starring:  Jim Carrey, Ben Schwartz, Keanu Reeves, Idris Elba, Coleen O'Shaugnessey, Krystan Ritter, Natasha Rothwell, Shemar Moore, James Marsden, Tika Sumpter


Sonic fans will be pleased to know that the third film is the best in the series.  What exactly this means for people like me who thought the first two movies sucked balls is more complicated.  I'm still irritated at this franchise for that first film, which has one of the most disgusting morals I've ever seen in a children's film, where the story told us we should put aside self-aspiration because it might make someone you barely know (who also watches you while you sleep) feel sad.  I feel gross just thinking about that movie, as well as the enabled toxicity that resulted from changing the main character's design to appease fans.  I mean, it was a horrid original design, but it underlined the film's thematic message of appeasing incels in a very yucky way.  The only saving grace was a hilarious performance by Jim Carrey.  The second one was just junky and dumb.  Still had Jim Carrey, though.  The third one has two Jim Carreys!  Yay!

This new adventure has Sonic colliding with a dark hedgehog named Shadow, who is just as fast as Sonic, but goth!  Shadow seeks revenge for the death of a human companion from years prior, and teams up with Jim Carrey's Dr. Robotnik and his grandfather (also played by Carrey) to watch the world burn.  Personally, I enjoyed the original Sonic games, but I drifted from the franchise as Sonic's personality became more defined.  I just don't like Sonic as a character.  I find his attitude grating.  Sonic has always been insufferable, and any movie he stars in will struggle against mediocrity until they figure out a way around that.  But even if it can't, the strength of this third film lies in cutting Jim Carrey loose and letting him hog the spotlight.  Carrey is a blast in this movie, and it's by far his best work in this franchise, and probably the funniest he has been since his heyday in the 90's.  It's a shame the movie can't solely be about him, as we flash back to the obnoxious critters running around.  But, to be fair, a few of the gags are solid, and the movie is adequately funny.  It's shallow, but it's entertaining.  I could have done for more development on Shadow, who seemed to have a sweet relationship with a little girl.  We find out a bit about her, but not enough for motivations in this film to fully make sense.  We also find out very little about where Shadow came from or if he's from the same world as Sonic.  Maybe the video games answer this, but I wouldn't know, because I haven't played Sonic since the days of Genesis.  I don't think any of this will matter to the intended audience, who likely just want to see Sonic run fast, be smarmy, and entertain them swiftly.  At that goal, Sonic the Hedgehog 3 succeeds.  Even for a grump like me who had no expectations for it, I have to admit, this one was fun enough.

Movies Still Playing At My Theater
Gladiator II ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Moana 2 ⭐️⭐️
Red One ⭐️⭐️
Wicked Part I ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2

New To Digital
Anora ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2

New To Physical
Absolution ⭐️⭐️
Conclave ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Piece by Piece ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Terrifier 3 ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Transformers One ⭐️⭐️

Coming Soon!

Monday, December 16, 2024

Cinema Playground Journal 2024: Week 50 (My Cinema Playground)

Multiplex Madness


Kraven the Hunter
⭐️
Genre:  Action, Superhero
Director:  J.C. Chandor
Starring:  Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Ariana DeBose, Russell Crowe, Fred Hechinger, Alessandro Nivola, Christopher Abbott


Honest-to-god, I love Kraven the Hunter.  The character, not the movie.  He's one of Spider-Man's greatest villains, and he's one that deserved to go toe-to-toe with Spidey in a movie.  There is something tragic about how Sony is subjecting Kraven to their sub-par, heartless solo film treatment.  Venom is at least a trashy character who semi-relishes such a spotlight, and nobody cares about Morbius or Madame Web.  Kraven deserved to be a proper Spider-Man antagonist in an actual movie.  They made this instead, potentially turning him into box office poison.  So far, that's the greatest sin that Sony has made against superhero cinema.  And they're the ones who made the Ghost Rider movie.

Okay, let's get this out of the way.  Kraven the Hunter is the story of Sergei Kravinoff, a Russian huntsman who is so in touch with nature that he is also half-beast, using his hunting skills to become an assassin.  When a crime boss kidnaps his little brother, Sergei puts all of his skills into a search and rescue.  There is a lot of sterilizing being done to make Kraven more of a protagonist, trying to make him softer.  Kraven is in tune with nature, but, in the comics, he is a game hunter who both hunts both beast and man for sport.  In this film, he is a man who lives out in the wild and sees himself as one with the animals.  It's a misguided side-step to make Kraven more cuddly when it just makes him toothless.  But there is still an underlining idea of Kraven here that the movie tries to latch itself onto, but it always slips away from it.  There are glimpses of promise within its setpieces, where it shows off the feral action film that it wants to be.  They are fleeting as it retreats into a dull narrative of brooding nonsense.  It's really funny that Sony has been advertising so enthusiastic about the gory R-rating for this movie when all it amounts to is cartoony CGI blood splatters.  The movie wants the pretense of being edgy without actually doing anything hardcore.  The animalistic action has no bite.

Aaron Taylor-Johnson at least looks great as the title character, and he sells some of character's more animalistic attribute.  But it becomes clear the movie is making sacrifices to his character to make things easier for Taylor-Johnson to play him.  There comes a point in the narrative where Kraven, a Russian character who never really left his country, suddenly decides to speak in an American accent as soon as he grows into Taylor-Johnson's age.  The same goes for Fred Hechinger as his brother Demetri.  The only person who commits to the Russian heritage is Russell Crowe, while everyone else rejects it in order to make the dialogue more palatable for American ears.  It's a fucking joke.  It's a movie that wants an animal man and is using the Kraven license as an excuse.  The best thing I can say for its commitment to the Spider-Man comics it's based on is that the big bad of the movie is Rhino, and it actually accepts the inherent stupidity of the character and goes full camp with it.  It's not a great showdown, but I'll give the movie credit for ending with a fight between two characters with completely different skill-sets.

It doesn't stop the movie from being completely atrocious, though.  And not even in a way that's fun to make fun of, like Morbius or Madame Web.  It took them decades to do it, but Hollywood finally made a Marvel adaptation that's worse than the 90's Captain America movie.  I'm not in the mood to celebrate, because they dragged a character I had respect for through the mud in order to do it.


The Lord of the Rings:  The War of the Rohirrim
⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Fantasy, Adventure
Director:  Kenji Kamiyama
Starring:  Brian Cox, Gaia Wise, Luke Pasqualino, Miranda Otto


It's amazing how much Lord of the Rings is mimicking Star Wars, branching out from a well-loved trilogy into a prequel trilogy nobody liked, and following that up with an animated movie that nobody asked for.  As for when the cash-in spin-off movies come around, apparently those are in the works, so don't worry about this franchise not being properly milked.  That's not even bringing up overwhelming streaming content that is exhausting to try and keep up with.  There is a lot of talk as to whether or not War of the Rohirrim is a blatent attempt to deathgrip onto lapsing film rights to this franchise while live-action spin-offs are developed, and I'm not really interested in judging that.  If it is, far more cynical attempts at this have happened, and that's just this weekend (why else would a Kraven the Hunter movie be made if Sony weren't scraping the Spider-Man license free of meat?).  At least The War of the Rohirrim seems to be handed off to a group of filmmakers who seem interested in making an honest-to-god Lord of the Rings movie.

Two-hundred years before the other Middle-Earth tales, The War of the Rohirrim tells the story of a lovers' spat that accidentally started a war.  A warrior princess named Héla refuses an engagement to childhood friend Wulf, which causes their two king father's to quarrel, where Héla's father accidentally kills Wulf's.  Wulf vows revenge, gathering an army to tear down Héla's kingdom.  I appreciate that this is a very different story than the other Middle-Earth movies, which defaulted on "Let's grab a ring and take a three-movie walk to smoke this bitch."  There's a lot going on, though, and it feels like it has more story than the entirety of any previous trilogy crammed into two hours.  But even as this movie feels rushed, it also feels meandering, as the events that are portrayed never feel like they steamroll in momentum properly.  This might be, in part, due to the animation, which is a little patchy in motion, even if it looks good in stills.  There is a sort of Don Bluth quality to it that is hard to deny, but while it's trying hard to be dynamic, it can't help but come off as stiff and lifeless.  I think they did what they could to breathe life into these characters who feel like they're asterisks in a Tolkien dictionary, but they never seize an audience's gaze through script or visual.

But overall, one thing that nags at me about this movie is that feels like a generic fantasy sword battle tale that happens to have a Lord of the Rings setting.  There are no Hobbits, there are no Elves, there are no Dwarves, and there is a single Wizard in a gratuitous cameo that kinda sucks.  While Middle-Earth isn't exclusively home to stories of them, it feels less like Middle-Earth without them.  The War of the Rohirrim feels distant from the movies it wants to honor, not in a bad way, but rather in a dull way.  But it's not all bad news.  I liked it better than the second Hobbit movie, which is still the most bored I have been watching any of these movies, and it's less cringe with its fan service than the third one.  I'm going to accept that as a minor win and move on.


Queer
⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre:  Drama
Director:  Luca Guadanino
Starring:  Daniel Craig, Drew Starkey, Jason Schwartzman, Henrique Zaga, Leslie Manville


In case you can't tell from the title, Queer is a story of "the gays."  Specifically, Daniel Craig is a gay man living in 1950.  It might seem like shock value in casting someone who has played James Bond, one of top brands of heterosexuality, in a gay role, but this isn't the first time a Bond actor has played a gay man.  If you insist that it is, that is "Roger Moore in Boat Trip" erasure and I will not stand for it.  But anyway, Craig begins a relationship with a cryptic man who Craig longs a stronger connection with.  And if you think you know where it's going from there, you're in for a ride, let me tell you.  The movie is not really a romance, feeling at times like a study in the struggles of homosexual bonding between partners.  That being said, some of the themes are more universal than that, as the film comes off as simple as being an allegory for trying to get closer to someone who seems mentally baracaded.  The movie goes a little off its rocker in exploring that, especially its crazy third act, but the movie is interesting when it's not being insane.

Movies Still Playing At My Theater
Gladiator II ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Interstellar ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Moana 2 ⭐️⭐️
Red One ⭐️⭐️
Werewolves ⭐️⭐️1/2
Wicked Part I ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Y2K ⭐️⭐️1/2

New To Digital
Heretic ⭐️⭐️⭐️

Coming Soon!

Monday, December 9, 2024

Cinema Playground Journal 2024: Week 49 (My Cinema Playground)

Multiplex Madness


Werewolves
⭐️⭐️1/2
🏆Must-See Bad Movie Award🏆
Genre:  Action, Horror
Director:  Steven C. Miller
Starring:  Frank Grillo, Katrina Law, Ilfenesh Hadera, James Michael Cummings, Lou Diamond Phillips, James Kyson


No, it's not the James Cameron sequel to Tony Zarrindast's MST classic Werewolf.  Instead, Frank Grillo is in a lycanthrope apocalypse!  The idea of the film is that every human has werewolf genes in their DNA, and every now and again there is an event called a "Supermoon" that unlocks it, turning everyone into a werewolf for a night.  Most humans lock themselves at home to avoid exposure to the moonlight, while other use the event to work on a suppression vaccine to cure it.  And also others just turn into werewolves and start murdering people.  Basically, it's The Purge, but with werewolves.


To get straight to the point, the movie is not particularly great.  It's an undercooked production with a big idea, trying to sell itself on that idea alone.  A big idea can only get you so far, but it's not nothing.  Given what it has to work with, ranging from a low budget to a melodramatic script, I respect the ambition the movie has.  No matter what you can fault the movie for, it doesn't skimp on the schlocky entertainment.  The movie is grim and gritty, while being goofy and silly all at once.  The werewolves will tear people to pieces while looking like Rahzar from Ninja Turtles II.  The movie appeals to a very particular kind of entertainment value, filling a niche that larger budget films do not.  Though, as amusing as the film is, one does wonder what this particular production might have accomplished with more money and a more complete script.  If the movie had gone direct to streaming, it probably would be seen at as an overlooked cult film.  In theaters, it comes off as dismissable.  But if you're willing to vibe with it, you'll slap your knee and have a good chuckle at the reckless disregard for human life.

TUSK!





Y2K
⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre:  Comedy, Horror
Director:  Kyle Mooney
Starring:  Jaeden Martell, Rachel Zegler, Julian Dennison, Lachlan Watson, Mason Gooding, Fred Durst, Alicia Silverstone


The actual Y2K scare is a weird asterisk in pop culture, one that Gen Z would likely look at Gen X and Millennials with less respect if someone tried to explain it to them.  It was this whole idea that computer systems of the time were programmed with yearly dates that were whittled down to two digits instead of four, so when the year "99" switched over to "00," all hell would break loose in the digital world because systems would think everything reset.  There was even a TV movie thriller exploiting it, that's how in the subconscious it was.  It's one of those "You had to be there" things.  This new Y2K movie is made for people who were there, see the title, and were like "lol, I remember that bullshit."

Y2K reinvents history by centering on a group of teenage party-goers on New Years Eve 1999, only to be caught off-guard by the realization that not only is the Y2K virus real, but it has caused all electronic devices to come to life and try to wipe out the human race.  It's kind of a hindsight joke about the apocalyptic fear people had, but my understanding was that Y2K was mostly about potential power outages and data resets erasing bank accounts and the like, not the creation of Skynet.  This movie rejigs what it was so it can make fun of how it made people feel, stylizing it in a way that is best described as a simulator of what it's like to get high and watch a double feature of Mallrats and Chopping Mall made by people whose TVs would only switch away from MTV if That 70's Show was on.  If that's your idea of a good time, by all means, Y2K is a movie made for you.  But if you think it looks dumb, then it's exactly what you think it is.  It's really fucking stupid, but it's stupid in an endearingly sincere way.  The movie has nothing but love for its retro era and lovingly makes it burn with its kitschy camp flavor.  Aspects of the film are underdeveloped in favor of a vibe, as we watch machines supposedly brought to life in a hive mind through the internet, even though most of the internet required cable connection back then, which makes these free-roaming creatures more advanced than what can be reasonably expected.  That's the same type of digital understanding you'd see in crappy 90's media of this type, like a Superhuman Samurai Syber Squad, so it kinda works in a roundabout way.  The movie doesn't want you to think that hard about it, it just wants you to chill to its vibe and its playlist, while making you bask in the glow of its parade of 90's legends in supporting roles, like Limp Bizkit's Fred Durst, Clueless star Alicia Silverstone, and cinematography by The Matrix's Bill Pope.  If you get it, you get it.  If you love it, you love it.  Y2K has little thought or care for people who don't get it or love it, and, if nothing else, I respect that.

Movies Still Playing At My Theater
Gladiator II ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Heretic ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Interstellar ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Moana 2 ⭐️⭐️
Red One ⭐️⭐️
Wicked Part I ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2

New To Digital
Good One ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Weekend in Taipei ⭐️⭐️
Your Monster ⭐️⭐️⭐️

New To Physical
Alien:  Rolumus ⭐️⭐️1/2
The Dead Don't Hurt ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Never Let Go ⭐️⭐️1/2
White Bird ⭐️⭐️⭐️
The Wild Robot ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2

Coming Soon!

Monday, December 2, 2024

Cinema Playground Journal 2024: Week 48 (My Cinema Playground)

Multiplex Madness


Moana 2
⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Adventure, Fantasy, Musical, Comedy
Director:  David Derrick Jr., Jason Hand, Dana Ledoux Miller
Starring:  Alui'i Cravalho, Dwayne Johnson, Hualālai Chung, Rose Matafeo, David Fane, Awhimai Fraser, Khaleesi Lambert-Tsuda, Temuera Morrison, Nicole Scherzinger, Rachel House, Gerald Ramsey, Alan Tudyk


I love Moana.  It's not only one of the best film's in Disney's lengthy animation history, it's one of the best films since the turn of the century.  It's a beautiful story of ambition and self-discovery, with probably the best music Lin-Manuel Miranda has ever offered his audience.  I actually didn't know a sequel was being made until the trailer dropped, which surprised me, because I would have thought I'd have been on top of that.  It turned out there was a good reason for that, because Moana 2 started out as a Disney+ miniseries as part of Disney's big streaming push under Bob Chapek before he was ousted from the studio.  The series was reworked into a theatrical sequel instead.

I had concerns.  The rhythm of TV is different than a feature film, and reformatting rarely finds an adjustment to that.  Add that in to the fact that Disney's wave of franchising out their popular animated productions has yet to provide a quality sequel.  Ralph Breaks the Internet had its moments, while Frozen II was a vanilla bore.  There has been nothing offered that has been nearly as inspired as 1990's The Rescuers Down Under, but that movie didn't make nearly as much money as the others, so that might just be a "me thing."  Meanwhile, Disney's animation has been in a mini slump since Encanto, with clunky films like Strange World and Wish underperforming with both critics and audiences (I liked Wish more than most, though).  Sure enough, Moana 2 lives up to most of my hesitancy, as its plot feels episodic enough that you can pick where each episode was supposed to end, while it offers no return to form for the mainstay animation studio, even though its animation is just as stunning as ever.  The unfortunate truth that hangs over Moana 2's head is that it's wasn't put into production wanting to live up to the first film, created to be consumed content rather than a meaningful continuation.  But the people who were making that content at the very least respected the first film, which makes it go down easier.

As suggested by the title, Moana is back.  This time she is tasked by her ancestors to restore the mythical island of Motufetu, which connected many lands across the sea.  This time she's not alone, not only reteaming with demigod Maui, but she puts up her own team of islanders to follow her on her mission to Motufetu.  All of these characters offer little other than quirky comic relief, displaying personality traits without much character, like the Autobots in a Michael Bay Transformers movie.  They offer very little to Moana on her journey, except to jabber at her with their distinctive tone.  The movie threatens to be a string of constant comic relief, which becomes a problem to the movie's vibe.  Even if one is ignorant to the complicated history of this film, it's very apparent that the sequel doesn't have the same spirit as the first film, leaning more heavily into slapstick comedy over soul-searching adventure.  Adventure and soul-searching are still present, but their blood has been drained until they're pale in the face.  The movie doesn't really mean much of anything to Moana that she didn't already go through in the first film, except maybe what appears to be a story of Moana becoming an inspirational leader to her crew.  The problem is that the movie never really leans into this.  Her crew all like her, respect her, and want to do right by her since the beginning of the film and there is really nowhere to go from there.  When you have a movie that has a theme on the tip of its tongue that it can't express, it becomes about little to nothing.  Instead, the movie just becomes more Moana, more Maui, more Heihei, and hey, Pua is here this time, too.  It just reminds us that we love these characters.  I didn't exactly need that reminder and would have preferred seeing them on a quest that was meaningful, but I did enjoy seeing them again, I'll admit.  And I will also admit that I am curious about what the climax means for Moana's future, though I would hope a potential third film has more inspiration fueling it.

Moana 2 could have and should have been better than this.  It could have kept the same story, but had done a complete script rehaul and featured more polished musical numbers, offering at least one song that can live up to "Away, Away," "You're Welcome," and the Oscar-winning "How Far I'll Go."  It's so easy to picture this movie working, and yet it instead floats in the ocean.  The best thing I can say is that the first Moana is still a meaninful story about a very special character.  An underwhelming sequel isn't going to change that.

Netflix & Chill


Dear Santa
⭐️⭐️
Streaming On:  Paramount+
Genre:  Comedy, Fantasy
Director:  Bobby Farrelly
Starring:  Jack Black, Robert Timothy Smith, Keegan-Michael Key, Brianne Howey, Hayes MacArthur, Austin Post, P.J. Byrne


I probably wouldn't have gone out of my way to watch this movie, but I have a kinda pretty funny story related to it and it piqued my curiosity because of it.  Last year, I did one of those focus study things where someone test screens a trailer for you and you respond to a series of unspecific questions that help the studios know what the audience is thinking.  I've done these before, watching trailers to the likes of Blockers, Fast X, and Aquaman 2.  This specific time made me raise an eyebrow though, because of the line of questioning I was given after the trailer played.  The trailer in question:  Dear Santa.  I watched the trailer, had a very neutral opinion of it, but the questions seemed less concerned about what I thought of the trailer and instead wanted to know what I thought of the title.  Honestly, the title sucks.  It's a very base title that tells you nothing about this movie, which sees a boy writing a letter to Santa Claus only to misspell "Santa" and accidentally summon Satan, played by Jack Black.  They gave me a series of titles to wade through, and they were all collectively awful (the worst one simply titled the movie "The Mix-Up," which is just...woof).  Anyway, time passed, the holiday season came and went, and the movie didn't come out.  I had mentioned this in passing on social media, only for my post to come to the attention of Ricky Blitt, the screenwriter of this movie.  We had a fun back and forth about it, and it was very informative.  Initially, he titled this script "Dear Satan," but Paramount got cold feet and didn't want to make a Christmas movie with "Satan" in the title because they thought it would turn off families.  The idea is absurd, because it's the premise of the entire movie.  You might as well just lean it and let the cards fall where they may.  I suppose they were so concerned about this that they shelved it for a year, and finally just dumped it on streaming with little fanfare.  What a wild ride for this movie that has lived in the back of my head for over a year.

The film itself is just high-concept silliness.  Nothing to get excited about nor worked-up over.  Jack Black is pretty solid in this movie, with special props to the costume and make-up departments for making him look like a Santa straight from Hell.  But at the same time, I suppose I can see why the movie was just tossed onto streaming.  It's a funny idea, but it's a quaint script that likely insists on more style than it's given.  The film is directed by Bobby Farrelly of Farrelly Brothers fame, which is certainly one way to approach this movie.  I kinda want to see a version of this movie with a little bit of a fiendish flair to it, like a Sam Raimi would provide.  It would probably up the budget a tad, but the light naughty Christmas theme would genuinely excell with some darker tones.  Instead, it's just directed like a slightly naughty holiday offering.  As is, the movie coasts on the shoulders of Jack Black and a couple of character actors to elevate the material.  Occasionally, they get a solid chuckle, but if one is hoping for more than a chuckle, the movie is likely a miss.  Unfortunately, I can't say this is a hidden holiday gem that the studio fumbled.

However, Ricky Blitt is a super nice guy.  Ten outta ten.  Would shoot the shit with again.

Movies Still Playing At My Theater
Bonhoeffer ⭐️⭐️
Gladiator II ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Heretic ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Red One ⭐️⭐️
Wicked Part I ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2

New To Streaming
Conclave ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Elevation ⭐️⭐️
Here ⭐️⭐️
Terrifier 3 ⭐️⭐️⭐️
We Live in Time ⭐️⭐️1/2

New To Physical
Hush ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

Coming Soon!

Monday, November 25, 2024

Cinema Playground Journal 2024: Week 47 (My Cinema Playground)

Multiplex Madness


Bonhoeffer
⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Drama
Director:  Todd Komarnicki
Starring:  Jonas Dassler, August Diehl, David Jonnson, Flula Borg, Moritz Bliebtreu, Nadine Heidenreich, Patrick Mölleken, Clarke Peters


I don't think the proper response to seeing a studio logo is "I am so tired," but that's the only thought Angel Studios has inspired in me.  It's not just that their chosen business is to appeal to the faith and inspirational market, it's just that they do it in such a trite and uninspired way.  Bonhoeffer at least seems to almost branch out into a borderline thriller, though it doesn't feel like anybody who works with the studio has any idea how to "thrill" its audience.  The movie tells the story of Deitrich Bonhoeffer, a German pastor who stood up to the Nazi government throughout the 1930's and 40's.  The tagline boasts "pastor, spy, assassin," and he is indeed two of those things.  That third bit is a bit strained, because while he was involved in an assassination attempt on Adolf Hitler, it wasn't a successful one and he wasn't exactly the one to make the attempt.  I'd describe that as closer to a conspirator than an assassin, but I guess they want that John Wick audience to watch their movie.  Bonhoeffer isn't the worst thing I've seen come out of Angel Studios, because at least the storyline is half-interesting.  The movie has an inspiring morality about it, warning of the dangers of perverting faith for political power, while criticizing the religious who sit by and let it happen.  The film has such an infantile presentation to its drama that it's well meaning story falls victim to its lack of subtlety.  It's a movie made by people who saw the "I could have saved one more" scene in Schindler's List and thought "The whole movie should be like that."  It's hammy with its melodrama to the point that it just becomes a bore when it should be enticing.  I'm sure the people who made this actually wanted to do this story justice, but unfortunately they tell it in a way that feels like a crime.


GladIIator
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Drama, Action
Director:  Ridley Scott
Starring:  Paul Mescal, Connie Nielson, Denzel Washington, Pedro Pascal, Joseph Quinn, Fred Hechinger, Lior Raz, Derek Jacobi


A sequel to Gladiator has been rumored off and on for a while now, including a weird development phase where Russell Crowe was supposed to return as a time traveler following his death in the original.  It was an idea so stupid that I would have given anything to see it, as opposed to the easy Gladiator sequel to make, which was just Gladiator again.  And that's what Gladiator II winds up being, another Gladiator.  Take that for what it's worth.  This time with a Ridley Scott who has far more indulgent and theatrical historical epics under his belt, often trying the recreate the success of the first Gladiator's indulgance and theatricality, few achieving it (save perhaps The Last Duel).  Gladiator II sees the son of Connie Nielson, revealed to be Russell Crowe's as well, grow up to be an enslaved soldier, just like his pops.  He fights gladiator matches and becomes a symbol of hope under oppression, again like dear old dad.  Like said before, it's Gladiator again, except this time with the guy from Aftersun.  Paul Mescal is a good actor, though he lacks the presence Russell Crowe had in the original, as he can't escape being a lighter clone as the film's redundant qualities barrell down on him.  While the film can't escape redundancy, it still maintains Gladiator's primal appeal with excellent action scenes and messy thrills.  In some ways Gladiator II benefits from being born into a generation that was influenced by the first film.  The people who made Game of Thrones obviously loved Gladiator, and the people who made Gladiator II obviously loved Game of Thrones.  Gladiator II is a quality product of its generational inspiration, even if it isn't as impactful as its namesake.  Those who treasure that namesake will definitely want to check it out.


Wicked Part I
⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre:  Musical, Fantasy
Director:  Jon M. Chu
Starring:  Cynthia Erivo, Ariana Grande-Butera, Michelle Yeoh, Jeff Goldblum, Jonathan Bailey, Ethan Slater, Bowen Yang, Marissa Bode, Peter Dinklage


Every once in a while I remember that last year had four two-part movie starters that were supposed to conclude this year, and the only one that had it's second installment arrive as expected was Rebel Moon (this was the one that everyone wanted the least).  The fact that these second movies never came out reflects very little on the films themselves (except maybe Fast X, because the production for both films sounds like a shit show), but rather production woes based on Hollywood strikes (Mission:  Impossible:  Dead Reckoning Part 2) and overly ambitious production goals (Spider-Man:  Beyond the Spider-Verse).  2024 learned zero lessons from this, offering up even more multi-film sagas, including Renny Harlin's three-part Strangers slasher movies and Kevin Costner's four-part Horizon western.  I admire ambition, to a limit.  At least The Strangers was one giant, low-budget production.  Costner went out and spent hundreds of millions of dollars on a glorified mid-2000's television miniseries and is at risk of not finishing it.

Now we have Wicked, masking that pesky "Part 1" in marketing materials, probably because we've gotten to the point where "Part 1" might make audiences groan and deflate potential success (this was what Paramount attributed to Dead Reckoning's mid performance, even though the Barbenheimer phenomenon was the more likely culprit there) and, if you lure people in, the cliffhanger ending probably won't turn people off in of itself if the movie is good enough (ala Infinity War, Dune, or Across the Spider-Verse).  Wicked was advertised as just an adaptation of the Broadway musical, but is actually just the first half of it.  Broadway fans can rest assured knowing that both Wicked films were filmed as one production, so the second half is on track with little hurdles in its way.  They'll have to wait until next November for it, but that was always the plan.

I'll admit that I have limited affinity for The Wizard of Oz.  It's something I appreciate more than I genuinely like.  It's a stunningly made, groundbreaking movie, but I just never connected with it.  I anticipated a similar feeling for Wicked, and to an extent, Wicked followed through on that.  It's also a well done movie that dazzles the audience it's targeted at, though my lack of investment in the Oz franchise limits just how interested I am in it.  That might come off as blunt criticism, but I think of it more as a notice that I am a neutral observer.

For those not Broadway-versed, Wicked tells a flipped view of the Oz story, centering on Elphaba, the "Wicked Witch," here portrayed as a magical girl who has been labeled a freak due to her green skin.  The film shows her attending college in the land of Oz and her frenemy relationship with "Good Witch" hopeful Glinda, leading up to a confrontation with the great Wizard himself.  I'll admit, I'm not too interested in a story about the Wicked Witch, as she's about as two-dimensional as any film villain has ever been.  However, I have to admit, that also makes her ideal to latch any sort of character traits onto her with ease.  Wicked does that quite well, albeit with a generic racism moral piled on top of a Mean Girls take on Harry Potter.  Cynthia Erivo gives a warm and bold performance as Elphaba, while Ariana Grande offers up comic relief with a frilly take on Glinda.  The film is helmed by Jon M. Chu, who directed a previous Broadway adaptation with In the Heights.  Admittedly, I find Wicked less interesting than In the Heights, which was a more energetic and satisfying knock-out musical, but Chu is a talent with films like this.  He always uses his camera smartly, having it dance with the choreography of the big numbers.  Wicked also has what is probably the largest budget Chu has ever worked with, which intrudes on that slightly, as he's also forced to show off the big sets and special effects more than to let the rhythm flow through the movie.  That's too bad, but Wicked is also a very bombastic power ballad musical, so it does match the tone of the picture.

It probably seems like I'm being harsh on this film, but I feel like I'm weighing it out.  For what it's worth, it's probably the second best Oz film, behind the beloved 1939 classic.  I'm not really who this movie is targeted at, but I'm going to give it credit for doing right by its audience.  Everyone else in the theater was absolutely glowing about this movie.  It's exactly what they wanted, and there is greatness in that.

Movies Still Playing At My Theater
Heretic ⭐️⭐️⭐️
A Real Pain ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Red One ⭐️⭐️
Smile 2 ⭐️⭐️1/2
The Wild Robot ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2

New To Digital
Absolution ⭐️⭐️
Monster Summer ⭐️⭐️
Smile 2 ⭐️⭐️1/2
We Live in Time ⭐️⭐️1/2

New To Physical
Beetlejuice Beetlejuice ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Godzilla Minus One ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
The Killer's Game ⭐️⭐️1/2
Speak No Evil ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Reagan ⭐️

Coming Soon!

Monday, November 18, 2024

Cinema Playground Journal 2024: Week 46 (My Cinema Playground)

Multiplex Madness


Bird
⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre:  Drama, Fantasy
Director:  Andrea Arnold
Starring:  Nykiya Adams, Barry Keoghan, Franz Rogowski, Jason Buda, Jasmine Jobson, Frankie Box, James Nelson-Joyce


A troubled young girl befriends an awkward outsider who is searching for his mother in this indie coming-of-age drama.  Bird starts off pretty straightforward, with rebellious teenage angst taking center stage of what, at first glance, is pretty run-of-the-mill and comes off an aimlessly generic attempt.  Assuredly, it takes a turn.  Does it make it more interesting?  I'd be challenged to say it does.  If anything, it turns its from aimless to lightly baffling.  The film crosses into metaphorical fantasy as it goes on, which feels like it's doing so because it doesn't trust its drama.  That's not entirely unwarranted, because while the acting is pretty good, the story ebbs and flows as it meanders without full certainty of where it's going.  As its final element starts rolling, the film has something to cling to, even as it grasp slips while it clumsily tries to fuse it into itself.  I'm curious if there is some local English folklore I'm missing that helps bring this movie together, but even if there is, I'm still left piecing this movie together from what abstract pieces it offers.  But Bird is an interesting piece, even as it misfires.


A Real Pain
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Drama, Comedy
Director:  Jesse Eisenberg
Starring:  Jesse Eisenberg, Kieran Culkin, Will Sharpe, Jennifer Grey, Kurt Egyiawan, Liza Sadovy, Daniel Oreskes


Jesse Eisenberg directs himself and Kieran Culkin as cousins who go on a tour of Holocaust sites in Poland after the passing of their grandmother, while Culkin's erratic behavior makes Eisenberg and the rest of the tour uncomfortable along the way.  A Real Pain is a contemplative dramedy featuring contrasting performances by its two leads.  Culkin is given the jucier role of the two, allowing for an unfiltered character who projects a frivolous nature that masks an internal depression.  Eisenberg gives himself a straight man role to use in observational study of such inner pain.  The movie has no answers for its subject, opting instead to be a study of the aimless lives that haven't been figured out, and how small they might feel in contrast to both people they know and the people that preceed them.  It's a lot to chew on for such a small movie.


Red One
⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Comedy, Fantasy, Adventure
Director:  Jake Kasdan
Starring:  Dwayne Johnson, Chris Evans, J.K. Simmons, Lucy Liu, Kiernan Shipka, Bonnie Hunt


The one-and-only Santa Claus has been kidnapped in the days leading up to Christmas, and personal bodyguard Dwayne Johnson teams up with professional tracker and "Level 4 Naughty Lister" Chris Evans to track him down and return him to the skies by Christmas Eve.  Johnson reteams with his Jumanji director Jake Kasdan for another hectic family adventure, though Red One lacks the creative spirit of the Jumanji films, even if the good-natured humor still wins it some charisma points.  The problem with doing a globe-trotting techno caper take on the Santa Claus mythos is that the novelty of "Christmas magic" falters while making things shinier and more action-based.  The appeal of the holiday gets lost in the gloss.  That's not to say it can't be done, but Red One is too pleased with its cheek to get in touch with its imagination.  The movie does clearly think its genre mash is imaginative enough, though it's probably confusing imagination with Christmas-themed gimmickry.  Red One is a lot of holiday paint airbrushed on basic noise.  It's enough for an empty evening at the movies, though it likely won't inspire many to put it on their annual holiday rotation.

Movies Still Playing At My Theater
Anora ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Conclave ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Elevation ⭐️⭐️
Heretic ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Smile 2 ⭐️⭐️1/2
We Live in Time ⭐️⭐️1/2
The Wild Robot ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2

New To Digital
Goodrich ⭐️⭐️1/2
Megalopolis ⭐️⭐️
Rumours ⭐️⭐️
Saturday Night ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2

Coming Soon!

Monday, November 11, 2024

Cinema Playground Journal 2024: Week 45

Multiplex Madness


Anora
⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre:  Comedy, Drama
Director:  Simon Baker
Starring:  Mikey Madison, Mark Eydelshteyn, Yura Borisov, Karren Karagulian, Vache Tovmasyan, Aleksei Serebryakov


A stripper/prostitute elopes with a wealthy Russian party boy, only to be caught off guard when his parents send a group of henchmen to force their annulment.  The movie sounds simple, but there is a sublimeness to its presentation that make it emotionally viable.  It owes a lot to Mikey Madison, who glows in the title role and acts as a force of energy as a chaotic woman in a chaotic situation insisting that she's found true love when all signs point to her being used as a symbol of frivolity.  Her attachment to the idea that she has found love makes her plight heartbreaking.  She's quite funny in the movie too, highlighted by an extended scene where a group of men try to calm her down, but she grows so violent that they have to subdue her, carefully trying not to make her feel like she's being assaulted but she's so out of control that the situation grows out of hand.  It's likely one of the best comedic setpieces you'll see in any movie this year, while it also highlights her emotional stress throughout the movie.  She is a woman who firmly believes that she has found her life outside of being used by men, only for it to sink in that the idea she thought of as love might just be her being used more thoroughly than usual.  It's a lovely look at one woman's idealism and how it can be thrown away.


The Best Christmas Pageant Ever
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Comedy, Faith
Director:  Dallas Jenkins
Starring:  Judy Greer, Peter Holmes, Molly Belle Wright, Lauren Graham


It's usually a general rule that the earlier in November that your Christmas movie opens, the worse it probably is, and if it opens in October then it needs to be ignored entirely.  Or it means it's opening early so it can flop and hit streaming by December.  The Best Christmas Pageant Ever opened as early in November as it possibly could have, so I didn't have high expectations.  The movie is better than you'd might think, though.  How much you enjoy it will depend on how embraclsive you are of its quaintness.  The film sees Judy Greer putting on a Christmas pageant for her local church, which is upended by a group of out-of-control troublemaking children.  It's simple and goofy, but it does so for broad family appeal, which is to be expected for a Christmas movie that doesn't star Billy Bob Thornton.  Is the movie funny?  Eh...more silly and rambunctious.  The film works more thematically than it does as a laugh riot.  The movie makes a point to target the idolization of the story of Christmas to the point that the story is softened up and loses its meaning, utilizing characters in poverty to show that the story is actually about perseverance through hardship and belief in something greater.  It's a quality moral for a Christmas movie, and one a lot of faith movies could learn from, because most movies of this type are about white middle-to-upper class pricks acting as if they're being persecuted against because atheism exists.  The movie actually parodies the dismissive attitude of the Christian church quite poignantly, showcasing that self-serving evangelical type that works against their religious teachings because their religion makes them feel above the downtrodden.  The moral becomes about the perversion of faith in the hands of the privileged and how it becomes separated from the people it might actually mean something to.  It's probably the best, most in-the-weeds moral I've seen in any Christmas movie I've seen in a while.  It's likely to fall on deaf ears, but that's not the movie's fault.  Its heart is full and in the right place, even if it could stand to be a little less vanilla when it's entire point is to give Christmas a little bit of an edge.  It's made by people who don't know where the edge is, but I appreciate the effort.


Christmas Eve in Miller's Point
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Comedy
Director:  Tyler Thomas Taormina
Starring:  Matilda Fleming, Maria Dizzia, Ben Shenkman, Francesca Scorsese, Elsie Fisher, Lev Cameron, Sawyer Spielberg, Gregg Turkington, Michael Cera


Oh boy.  Another Christmas movie before Thanksgiving.  Just what I wanted, tow in on one weekend.  This one is an indie comedy that sees a family gathering at their grandmother's house for what may be their last holiday party before the sale of the house and putting her into a nursing home.  Laughter ensues as we watch family relations get out of hand.  The movie is very good at depicting that rowdy Christmas atmosphere of a family holiday get-together, from the people who live for it down to the people who don't want to be there.  It then sideramps into a slight teens-be-teens adventure to highlight that underground spirit of individuality breaking free from their roots, but still coming home in the end.  Michael Cera and Gregg Turkington are also in this movie, looking out of place as they lean more into quirky character comedians instead of the silly family archetype the rest of the movie works with.  Because of that, the movie struggles to maintain a consistent tone at times, but that's only five percent of a movie that mostly works.


Elevation
⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Science Fiction, Thriller
Director:  George Nolfi
Starring:  Anthony Mackie, Morena Baccarin, Maddie Hasson, Tony Goldwyn


Mankind becomes an endangered species yet again in another post-apocalyptic thriller with creepy crawlies running around.  Indestructible beasties cannot exceed above a certain elevation, so camps of survivors retreat into the mountains.  Why can't they go up there?  The movie doesn't explain.  Maybe they don't like hard nipples and shrinkage.  But Anthony Mackie needs medical equipment for his son, so he needs to venture out into the danger zone to retrieve it.  If you've seen movies like Elevation before, then you've already seen Elevation.  It's an unambitious, exposition-heavy script from people who have probably seen a hundred episodes of The Walking Dead, memorized every trope, and generalized them to their bare bones, ensuring Elevation is only passive entertainment. But solid actors and decent creature feature action help balance it's less polished edges.  Mackie is a likeable leading man, and Morena Baccarin manages to make the movie heavier in some beats than it has any right to be.  With a script this threadbare, the cast upping their game is a plus.  The film climaxes on a bizarre ending that is unadulterated silliness, answering some questions but asking a hundred more, feeling like it's promising a franchise that it takes optimism to assume an audience will demand.  The movie cost only $18 million to produce (and it resources it very smartly, in all fairness), so it wouldn't take that much to make it a success.  It still feels like a lot to ask an audience to like this movie enough to want another one.


Heretic
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Horror, Thriller
Director:  Scott Beck, Bryan Woods
Starring:  Hugh Grant, Sophie Thatcher, Chloe East


Heretic is the latest genre offering from Scott Beck and Bryan Woods, who are best known as the writers of A Quiet Place, though they have been trying to build a directing career outside of that film since even before it came out.  They had a minor indie spooky house flick called Haunt, and last year they went blockbuster by shooting laser guns at dinosaurs in 65.  Heretic is a snap back to lower-budget fare, and it's probably one of the better scripts they've put out.  I say this with a huge caveat, because I'm not really one that gets into movies that are theological discussions that are clearly created by someone with a one-sided bias (probably the worst example of this is last year's Nefarious, which was so theologically naive that it felt like it was written by a grade-schooler).  Heretic's screenplay sometimes comes off like it was written by the type who brags about being an athiest every time someone brings up their own faith, who convinced himself he's doing so to make a point, but is really doing it because he likes the way it feels to be a smug asshole.  So, already there's a certain level of obnoxiousness to this movie that turns me off, but it's a tight screenplay and a well-crafted production, which does put my hesitancy on the backseat.  Heritic's story is about two Mormon girls who are invited into the house of Hugh Grant to discuss his potentially joining the church.  The tables start to turn when Grant plays mind games with the girls, seemingly pushing them to test their faith in front of him.  What is his game?  It has a few crazy turns, though I'll admit being a little underwhelmed with the final reveal.  The movie is cautiously intricate, though despite that, it can't help but delve into clumsy habits.  Grant is given a lot of detailed dialogue, and he belts it out effortlessly and with intense charisma.  But as good as Grant is and despite the movie's theology pretense, it really just boils down to an old man being a dick to two young girls.  It's a good thing it's an engaging example of that.  Once you accept the meat and potatoes of the meal, it's a solid ride of twistedness.  It's probably not one that was ever destined to win me over, but it's probably the highlight of Beck and Woods' resume to date.


Meanwhile on Earth
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Science Fiction
Director:  Jérémy Clapin
Starring:  Megan Northam, Catherine Salée, Sam Louwyck


French science fiction film features a woman is contacted by a disembodied voice, which tells her that it can bring back her brother, who was lost on a space mission years prior.  Thematically, the film is about how loss haunts a person and the will to make that which is gone return to you.  The movie is fueled by forceful sound design, mixed with intense cinematography focused on a locked in performance by Megan Northam.  The vibes of the film are mostly grounded, coming off as an indie drama about mourning with psychological supernatural elements.  As such, the movie is more about its metaphor than its premise, so it doesn't end on a note of full closure.  The movie is lovely in that regard, though it never really breaks away from its modesty.


Small Things like These
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Drama
Director:  Tim Mielants
Starring:  Cillian Murphy, Eileen Walsh, Michelle Fairley, Clare Dunne, Helen Behan, Emily Watson


Fresh off his Oscar win, Cillain Murphy goes back to the Award-baiting performance well with this story where he plays a delivery man who suspects that women taken in by a local convention are being mistreated and abused.  Normally movies like this are about confrontation with the people who do bad deeds, but Small Things like These is more about internal conflict.  The film tells a story of a man living a mundane life who notices something is amiss, which gives him the turmoil of whether to keep his head down in his normalcy or to get involved in something outside his small world.  The film has a low-scale view of this type of story, focusing on the moral stress of being the man to notice a wrong rather than an effort to right it.  The film's sloth pace will be appreciated by some more than others, as it takes a while to get going and, even when it does, it focuses on Murphy's contemplation.  If one is a Murphy fan, it's definitely a performance to chew on in a movie with an intriguing approach to its subject matter.


Weekend in Taipei
⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Action, Comedy
Director:  George Huang
Starring:  Luke Evans, Gwei Lun-mei, Sung Kang


This inconsistent martial arts flick has Luke Evans as an American agent in Taiwan, where he leads a team tasked with taking down corrupt billionaire Sung Kang, going out of his way to protect the wife and son who have been leaking him information.  The movie is primarily a throwback to the type of imported Asian action flick that swelled in the market about thirty years ago, though the film never reaches the heights of that subgenre.  After a while it tonally downgrades into a low rent Jason Statham movie that borders on a bargain basement Steven Seagal movie.  It never commits to any of the charm either could offer, just tiring out and working hard to end itself.  Casting Luke Evans in a 90s martial arts action-comedy homage is like casting Bruce Willis when Jackie Chan and Jet Li won't return your calls.  Sure, he'll get the job done, but there's a disconnect in style.  In fairness, The movie's action is on point, but it's comedy is overtly staged and hammed up until it loses all impact.  For example, the movie's female lead is introduced in a rather bizarre Breakfast at Tiffany's homage, dressing like Audrey Hepburn and with an instrumental of Moon River playing, before sucker punching us with her closing the scene with her racing a car through the streets that would make her co-stars who have been in Fast & Furious movies envious.  That's only a slight hint at how stilted and awkward the movie can be, though it's moderately entertaining if you're only here to see people get punched.

Movies Still Playing At My Theater
Beetlejuice Beetlejuice ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Conclave ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Here ⭐️⭐️
Smile 2 ⭐️⭐️1/2
Terrifier 3 ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Twisters ⭐️⭐️
We Live in Time ⭐️⭐️1/2
The Wild Robot ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2

New To Digital
The Wild Robot ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2

New To Physical
1992 ⭐️⭐️1/2
The 4:30 Movie ⭐️⭐️⭐️
AfrAId ⭐️
Blink Twice ⭐️⭐️1/2
The Crow ⭐️1/2
It Ends with Us ⭐️⭐️
Strange Darling ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Trap ⭐️⭐️
You Gotta Believe ⭐️⭐️

Coming Soon!