Monday, November 9, 2026

Cinema Playground Journal 2026: Week 45 (My Cinema Playground)

Multiplex Madness


The Cat in the Hat
⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Fantasy, Comedy
Director:  Erica Rivinoja, Alessandro Carloni
Starring:  Bill Hader, Matt Berry, Quinta Brunson, Xochitl Gomez, Giancarlo Esposito, America Ferrera


This is the second attempt to turn the Cat in the Hat into a feature film, following a 2003 live-action disaster starring Mike Myers.  I never saw that movie because it looked like it would suffocate my soul.  This new animated movie didn't look very good either but it seemed at the very least to be more in tune with the stylings of Dr. Seuss.  The thing is, I never thought any Dr. Seuss story actually supported feature length narrative.  The Grinch is probably the only one I can understand, because that character has an arc that can reasonably be expanded upon.  The Cat in the Hat is a home invader who wrecks the house.  I don't know what story you're trying to tell with him.  If you're willing to overthink this, then we are inches away from feature films of Go Dog Go and Green Eggs and Ham.  And overthink we shall, because now the Cat in the Hat is an agent of some multiversal bureaucracy that encourages children to keep their imagination or something.  Think Monsters Inc. but for wasting time instead of making children cry.  The Cat also loses a magic stopwatch that reverses time, which also unleashes a shadow demon for some reason.

What is any of this?

Look, there was always going to be a ceiling on how coherent a Cat in the a Hat movie was going to be.  Probably the important thing is theming, of which the movie is about embracing change as the main children characters are bummed after moving and learning to accept it.  Sure.  Good enough, I guess.  There are no shortage of children's movies with this story but this suits the Cat in the Hat story.  The movie can be imaginative, but it's imagination is also mundane and uninspired.  The comedy can have its moments, but it's also repetitious.  The movie is a long road of okay enough children's entertainment.  I guess if your kids are too young for Wildwood, the movie is better than nothing, but it's also difficult to justify spending money on it at all.


Drummer Boy
⭐️
Genre:  Drama, War, Musical
Director:  Ben Smallbone, Joel David Smallbone
Starring:  Joel David Smallbone, Lucas Leach, Ioan Gruffudd, Melora Hardin, Charles Esten, Beth Easdown, Iain Glen, India Brown


Angel Studios chases Hamilton and does about as well as you'd expect.

The Smallbone family, the people who made the sappy, not-very-good autobiographical film Unsung Hero team up with the most prominent faith company in the biz (that is, when Lionsgate isn't pandering in that direction), telling a bullshit musical that they wrapped around that Little Drummer Boy Christmas song.  The main premise centers around two brothers during the American Revolution, one joining the British army and the other with the revolting Colonists.  The Colonial officer becomes a marching drummer who learns to win the war by weilding the power of an ADR drumbeat.

The climax to this movie is really funny, and I'm going to spoil it full on because I don't care and nobody who is going to watch this movie is going to read this.  The British are about to execute the drummer boy's brother and just stop because he starts beating his drum and it's TOO POWERFUL.  They all look in his direction all scared like "OH NO, NOT DRUMMER BOY!"  Then his brother starts running toward him when the big bad British guy who is the villain of the movie just opens fire on him and both the drummer boy and the love interest character both run out to him while the both armies just look out at them like "Oh no, someone got shot during a war.  How could something like this happen?"  I tried not to laugh as hard as I wanted to because the theater was filled with teary-eyed seniors and I would have had so much popcorn thrown at me.  What a scene.

If you're wondering if the rest of the movie is just as bad, I'd say it encompasses the cheapness of the movie's sentimental tone.  The Smallbone crew loves sap.  You could tell this from their last movie and it's even worse here.  Co-director Joel Smallbone starred in both movies and I didn't recognize him at first.  I originally thought it was because he didn't have that terrible beard, because without it he looks like if Josh Halloway and Henry Cavill made sweet, sweet love and had a child (this is a compliment, he's very handsome without whatever the fuck was going on with that facial hair).  Then I realized that the reason for this was that, throughout the entirety of Unsung Hero, he had this "life is unfair" grimmace on his face and he actually has more diverse emotions in this movie.  It wasn't until later in the movie where he pursed his lips and looked like he was hiding man-tears when I pointed at the screen and silently shouted in my head "That's the face!  That's the Unsung Hero face!"


He has a love triangle with a slave girl and her blonde-haired master, which is one of the most wild creative choices I've seen in any Angel flick because I highly doubt anybody who works at their studio is going to tell a slave tale with nuance and respect.  Through most of the movie, you can forget that she is a slave because she is almost talked to as if she were treated as an equal, which is how you can tell this movie is by a white person trying to relate a story about racism.  Sometimes it feels like the movie is almost going down the "slavery wasn't that bad, actually" route.  It does dive into some dirty details but it's also afraid to get too involved with them, making the movie toothless.  If you're going to present an interracial love story in the 1700's, there should be a lot to unpack there that the movie doesn't even touch.  There is one aspect of it that adds a little bit of flavor, in that this slave girl was actually the product of her mother being raped by the slave owner, making her the half-sister of the other girl in the love triangle, but the movie never does anything of value with this.

The guy behind me thought the romance was really funny and kept laughing and making fart noises at it.  I can't tell if he was mocking the movie or mocking the idea of a white guy and a Black woman falling in love.  It's an Angel movie, so either could be possible.

The musical element isn't great but it's also not the movie's worst aspect.  The songs are repetitive pop tunes in a period setting and, frankly, sometimes it feels as if the movie forgets it's supposed to be a musical because it gets way too into itself.  It's not necessarily into its own story, more into the schmaltz it thinks its projecting.  The most frustrating thing about this movie is how it squanders itself.  It has a story about two brothers on opposing sides of a war.  That's interesting.  It has a subplot about a slave-owner and a slave who is her half-sister.  That's also interesting.  It spoils both of these by treating the drama of both as garnish for its monotonous power ballads and patriotic sentimentality, undercutting any story it presents.

At one point, I just wrote down in my notes "What a piece of shit."  I don't remember what prompted this but I do remember being driven to the point of madness with this movie's ineptitude.  Frankly, I've wasted enough time on this.  Let's talk about this week's main event...


Godzilla Minus Zero
⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre:  Kaiju, Science Fiction, Thriller
Director:  Takashi Yamazaki
Starring:  Ryunosuki Kamiki, Minami Hamabe, Min Tanaka, Hidetaka Yoshioka, Masami Nagasawa, Yuki Yamada, Kuranosuke Sasaki, Jun Kunimura, Sakura Ando, Miou Tanaka


Godzilla Minus One was a kaiju film for the Train to Busan generation of monster movie filmmaking, taking normal ventures of extravaganza and intertwining it with soulful indie character-driven stories.  It brought the franchise into accolades it has never achieved before and earned an Oscar for its visual effects work, which is incredible when you consider the Godzilla franchise has always been widely mocked for its effects.  Going into a direct sequel brings high expectations, but one would hope a second film would be the Dark Knight to Minus One's Batman Begins.  Godzilla Minus Zero doesn't quite achieve that, but on the scale of the franchise, it still manages to be an exceptional entry in the series.

Picking up two years after the first film, Kōichi Shikishima is now married to Noriko and fathering little Akiko.  He is called back into action when a new monster hatches from a meteorite and evolves into King Ghidorah, a three-headed monster who feasts on electricity.  When a newly regenerated Godzilla emerges from the sea, a new plan is set forth to pit him against Ghidorah.  Big monster go punch and fight.  BOOM!  All that fun stuff.

What's interesting to me about the Minus series is that a lot of disaster films use death and destruction as spectacle.  In the Minus films, life is cherished and death is something to be mourned.  In Minus One, most of the characters who die do so early in the movie, loading trauma onto our characters and leading to a finale where pretty much all of the people we've grown attached to come home safe.  With Minus Zero, returning director Takashi Yamazaki takes this ideal to a harrowing level.  This is the primary reason Minus Zero has garnered the franchise's first R rating in the U.S., because death is more abundant and Yamazaki wants us to feel the weight of it.  The aftermath of Godzilla's Ginza attack from the previous film is examined more thoroughly, as many survivors are left scarred with radiation burns and charred corpses are seen in the wreckage.  Ghidorah's attacks are treated similarly, as people, including children, die onscreen and we are also left with scenes of gathering survivors seeking medical attention that calls to mind the original Godzilla film from 1954.  Parents of children who are Godzilla fans will want to heed the warning and watch the film beforehand.  I'm not sure if it's worse that Godzilla vs. Hedorah melting people (that movie is rated G) or Return of Godzilla showing its own irradiated corpses (that one is PG) but the tone of the scenes definitely skews it as something to be taken more seriously.  Minus Zero takes the franchise's echoing of post-bombing Japan and takes it to a more graphic level than we've ever seen.

What I think most people will want to know is whether or not the human story is as good as the last one's.  It's not, but that's not to say it's bad, just that I doubt that it will resonate as much.  The biggest problem with Minus Zero is when it leans too heavily into trying to re-live beats that Minus One did effectively.  The film can be pretty shameless about this, and it feels unnecessary.  At the same time, there are plot moments that feel copied from the previous film as well, which made me feel that there was limited point in revisiting these characters if it was just going to put them through the same wringer that they've already been through.  And when the movie does pull some new moves, it's not above getting a bit soapy, having people stare off into a distance and talk to themselves in monologue.  All of these are the things the film does worse.  That doesn't speak for the entirety of the film's human element, though.  The film's upped ante on consequences to violence enhances the continuing themes of trauma, because traumatic events keep happening.  It brings up more questions of when it's best to serve your country and when its best to serve yourself and your loved ones, coming up with several gray area answers.

In addition to Shikishima, Noriko, and Akiko, the character of Noda (or "Doc," as we lovingly refer to him as) and his fabulous hair have a much expanded role in this film, now servicing Japan as a crisis head.  Noriko has her own storyline, as her survival in the previous film suddenly thrusts her into a position of interest, to Shikishima's dismay.  Akiko also has a bit more to do, as the little actress that they've maintained from the previous film is still surprisingly effective in her role.  Captain Akitsu, young crewman Shirō, and neighbor Sumiko all reprise their roles for this movie, though they are limited to supporting roles that are borderline cameos.  New characters include Kanji Mirakami, a biologist fighting traumatic flashbacks and seething resentment for America, and Makoto Aoyama, a meteorologist who acts as Noda's assistant, both of which are quality additions.  Let it also be known that there are English actors in this movie.  Per usual, Japanese films tend to cast English actors based on appearance rather than skill, but I will say this is far from the worst English acting in the franchise.  Still, not great. 

Surprisingly, I think the monster spectacle outshines the the human story more than I think a lot of people are going to be hoping for.  It's not that the movie favors it, because the amount of scenes with Godzilla and Ghidorah is probably not much more than Godzilla's sceentime in the previous film, but the movie has just gotten more vicious and dangerous with it while the human story isn't all that advanced over the previous film.  Godzilla and Ghidorah's fights are brutal.  This is a level of gore and dismemberment that we have never seen in our beastial battles.  It makes sense, as Godzilla had Wolverine level regeneration in the previous film and Ghidorah is similarly durable, so just letting them tear into each other feels exactly like what these two titans would do.  The climactic battle is lengthy and takes the effects work of the Minus series to stunning levels, diving into full immersion on an IMAX screen.  The other main action scene of the film is an areal chase with Ghidorah, which is just as spellbinding.  On top of that, Yamazaki took me by surprise in that he used his CGI setpieces to recreate sequences and shots from 1964's Ghidorah, the Three-Headed Monster, which I thought were just magnificent.  He also recreated the poster to 1991's Godzilla vs. King Ghidorah during the final battle by having Ghidorah wrap his body around Godzilla.  The action sequences certainly stepped up their game to make up for some stagnancy in the plot.

My one big gripe about Godzilla Minus Zero is that Godzilla films have a history of letting the monsters be the connecting threads between the films and this is a rare example of continuing off the human storyline, and the result might divide people.  Minus One brought in the most beloved characters of the franchise and it would have probably been foolhardy to not bring them back.  The question then becomes whether or not there is more story for them, especially since the last film had a pretty solid ending that wrapped up everything it needed to.  The film could have easily introduced a new batch of characters and had them tell their own personal story.  The main reason to return to Minus One's story is to expand upon the questions surrounding Noriko's survival, of which we do get answers but also limited resolution to.  In fact, the ending to this film is way more open than the previous film, and it feels like a trilogy capper is inevitable.  I hope we get it, because the end of this film is not the final word that I want for these characters and there are several lingering threads that I would hope to see resolved.  Minus One worked as a standalone.  Making a film that shows us what happens next for these protagonists now just raises more concerns about what else happens next.  I'm gonna need that third film, because this won't do at all.  I demand satisfaction and a happy ending for my favorite family.

Now, if you don't mind, I'm going to play the remaster of Destroy All Monsters Melee.



Jimmy
⭐️1/2
Genre:  Drama, War
Director:  Aaron Burns
Starring:  KJ Apa, Jason Alexander, Max Casella, Sarah Drew, Julian Works, Neal McDonough, Rob Riggle


I like James Stewart.  I like him a lot.  It's a Wonderful Life is one of my favorite movies.  If Stewart is going to have a biopic that culminates in the making of that film, he deserves better than this.

This film primarily focuses on Stewart during World War II, where he leaves Hollywood and is drafted into the Air Force.  The film follows him as he rises up in the ranks and returns homewith PTSD.  I'm all for telling this story.  This could have been excellent if it were done well.  The approach leaves a lot to be desired.  Jimmy stylizes itself very closely to the type of Frank Capra films Stewart was making during this period.  As good as those films were, this movie also obliviously argues that there is a reason they don't make them like that anymore.  The movie is sappy and old fashioned to a fault, as everyone is so busy diving into quaint theatricality that the film is constantly feeling fake.  Some moments do resonate quite strongly, while others just make me want to shake the film and yell "If you're going to do melodrama, do it better!"  It really hammers the nail in the coffin when it gets to the making of It's a Wonderful Life, which falls into that schmaltzy pitfall of "Everything this movie is going to achieve, we knew it was going to happen.  This will be the most important movie ever made."  Stop that.  You're embarrassing yourself.

I feel bad for KJ Apa.  It's really hard to do Jimmy Stewart and not come off as an impressionist.  His take does come off as an impression but it's a really good one, and he's trying really hard to put a human behind it.  He's practically the only thing in this movie that is approaching the quality that a legend like Stewart deserves.  The rest of this movie is just junk.


The Last Temptation of Becky
⭐️1/2
Genre:  Comedy, Action, Spy, Thriller
Director:  Jenn Wexler
Starring:  Lulu Wilson, Kate Seigel, Neil Patrick Harris, Brandon Flynn, Catherine Walker, James Urbaniak


Oh.  Boy.  Becky's back.  My...favorite?

Becky and I have a complicated relationship.  I really want to like these movies (and, surprisingly, I've watched all three of them in a theater, even the one during COVID) but they always find that one way to execute their bloody mayhem that will annoy me.  I didn't care for the first movie, and I was muted on the second.  Now we have a trilogy capper, where the bloodthirsty teenager with rage issues is now a legal adult and working for the government.  She's technically not an assassin but that's what she's used for.  Some people gotta die and she has to murder someone, so she might as well kill them.  Now, the girl who kills Neo Nazis is sent after a family of actual German Nazis who plan to rise the movement to power again.

The Last Temptation of Becky is the worst of the three movies.  It's the most poorly concieved and the most poorly made.  Putting Becky in a spy setting achieves nothing because Becky is not an inquisitive character.  She just points herself in a general direction, screams, and kills everyone in her way.  She doesn't care about why, and there is no room for plot.  All this noise is just an excuse to get her to Germany so she can break some skulls.  Pitting her against literal Nazis does, however, make sense for the absurd escalation of the franchise.  If the movie actually had the resources for this, it could probably be fun in an empty calorie, Sisu sort of way.  There is a lot of ambition, but it also has the lowest budget.  A lot of the violence is low-impact, trying to be more cartoony because they can't make it look real and everything in this movie is stupid, so reality can take a hike.  They don't even have the money to do that properly though, leading to an action/comedy that isn't very fun to watch.

Lulu Wilson's love for the character is the one highlight.  She clearly wants to keep Becky alive and relevant, and she delivers all of her one-liners with glee.  Unfortunately, Becky has always been more of an idea than a character, as she represents the angst and rage of puberty being unleashed in a hyperviolent package.  Also, it needs to be said that the older Becky gets, the more she loses that.  Wilson is in her twenties now, which likely means it's time to lay Becky to rest.  I wouldn't be surprised if she comes back, though.  The people who make these movies seem to want her to be immortal.


Wild Horse Nine
⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre:  Comedy, Spy, Thriller
Director:  Martin McDonough
Starring:  John Malkovich, Sam Rockwell, Steve Buscemi, Tom Waits, Parker Posey


Another banger from Martin McDonough, though I'd argue that Wild Horse Nine doesn't hit the same as the two acclaimed films he preceeded it with, Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri and his masterpiece, The Banshees of Inisherin.  That's not to ward people off though, because his sort of outsider, kick-to-the-teeth approach makes his work some of the most accessible and entertaining films you'll see during award season.  Wild Horse Nine follows C.I.A. agent Sam Rockwell and his partner John Malkovich, who is battling dementia and dying of cancer, on a detour in Easter Island.  Malkovich plans to end his life on the island, but Rockwell's reluctance to help him makes things less than smooth, as does the C.I.A.'s insistence that Malkovich's devil-may-care attitude doesn't lead to any dark secrets spreading.  The movie is a little bit like McDonough doing his own version of Of Mice and Men (and Malkovich already did Of Mice and Men, so...); a character study between two friends, loyal to each other but one reckless by nature, in an environment where things are spiraling in an ultimate direction.  Sometimes it's too casual to reveal that direction, but it is always witty and engaging.  The movie is contemplative about men who made ripples without being seen, often doing bad things because they were told to, wondering what they did it all for and what it makes them.  It's interesting because McDonough always keeps the film chatty and everyone is always saying something worth listening to, be it a joke or a serious topic disguised as a joke.  I was hanging off of every word, which is par for the course with McDonough's work.  Dialogue is his bread and butter, and Malkovich and Rockwell know how to deliver it.

Movies Still Playing At My Theater
Clayface ⭐️⭐️1/2
Heart of the Beast ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Resident Evil ⭐️⭐️
Sense and Sensibility ⭐️⭐️1/2
Street Fighter ⭐️⭐️
Whalefall ⭐️⭐️1/2
Wicker ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Wildwood ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
You Can See Everything ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2

New To Digital
Primetime ⭐️⭐️1/2
Resident Evil ⭐️⭐️
Sense and Sensibility ⭐️⭐️1/2

New To Physical
KPop Demon Hunters ⭐️⭐️⭐️
The End of Oak Street ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Mutiny ⭐️1/2
The Uprising ⭐️⭐️1/2

Coming Soon!

Monday, November 2, 2026

Cinema Playground Journal 2026: Week 44 (My Cinema Playground)

Multiplex Madness


Breeder
⭐️1/2
Genre:  Horror
Director:  Alex Goyette
Starring:  Daniel Doheny, Dot-Marie Jones, Maddie Phillips, Tanaya Beatty


A struggling M.I.T. student is lured into the home of a woman under the pretense of helping her breed dogs.  In reality, she traps him in her home and forces him to breed with her daughters.  The simple idea of "the way we treat animals is heartless and cruel if we treat humans the same way" is hardly a new concept, and Breeder has an interesting spin on it deep down its rabbit hole.  One can see the idea its playing with and the vision of the way it presents itself.  The issue is that the script is thinly written with little means of tension building, just abrasively pushing discomfort unpleasantness in our faces in hopes that the formula crafts unease by accident.  The best aspects of this movie made me want to like it, but while it can be smart, it's never slick.  There is little care in how it progresses its story, and at times it feels like pieces are missing and the movie fails to genuinely explore the idea it presents or just ignoring gaping holes in its logic.  The movie never grabbed me because it was too busy frustrating me, concentrating on just being overbearing with its mood and never concerned with actually crafting something that was worth watching.  There are things that this movie does very well, but telling the story that it chose to tell is not one of them.


Christmas at the Kringles
⭐️1/2
Genre:  Comedy, Action, Horror
Director:  Kevin Lewis
Starring:  Ron Livingston, Rachel Bilson, Rob Riggle, Thomas Linnon, Arden Myrin, Donald Faison, Beverly D'Angelo


My general arbitrary rule is that if a Christmas movie opens in October, that usually means it's not very good.  I think I need to come up with a new one for Christmas movies that open in October but don't take place on Christmas, because this one sets itself on Valentine's Day.  I don't even know what we're doing here anymore.

This black comedy features a family that moves in next to neighbors who celebrate Christmas year round.  That jolly family actually belongs to a cult that tries to assimilate you into their joyful family or they will murder you.  It's like Texas Chainsaw Massacre, only if the cannibal rednecks were replaced with the Flanders family from The Simpsons and were equally bloodthirsty.  Admirable anti-holiday cheer has charm, but the screenplay lacks any sort of propulsion to its madness.  The only selling point to any of it is how perfectly cast it is.  That cast is given a lot of mayhem and one-liners to deliver, but I wish that the film had some sort of idea beyond holiday themed maniacal cackling because it doesn't really do anything else.  Some of the jokes are okay, some of the violence is fun, but the movie is pretty half-baked.  When movies like Violent Night and Terrifier 3 exist and already offer the counter-Christmas programing experience of holiday bloodshed while also feeling like they have a complete screenplay, a movie like Christmas at the Kringles just isn't going to cut it.


Everest:  The Other Side
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Documentary
Director:  Elizabeth Chai Vasarhelyi, Jimmy Chin
Starring:  Jim Morrison, Hilaree Nelson


The directors of the Oscar winning documentary Free Solo are back with another documentary about every MSTie's favorite pastime, rock climbing!  And snow climbing, too!  And a little bit of skiing.

Jim Morrison (NOT THAT ONE) and his wife Hilaree Nelson are mountain climbers who specialize in climbing to peaks and skiing down the snowy tops.  They devise their big bucket list project to be, what else, Mount Everest.  Not only that, they insist upon climbing up the northern side, which is the more rarely traversed because it's the more dangerous path.  The effort takes more than five years to come to fruition, but the final climb happened in 2025, resulting in a four hour ski down the side of the great mountain.  The venture can spurt around as the mountaineers encounter setbacks, false starts, peril, and tragedy.  Those who follow these two likely already know of some of the film's more heartwrenching moments, which are caught on camera and are rightfully shocking.  Sadly, documentaries are beholden to the narrative that plays out on camera, and as things go wrong and the climb gets pushed back, the movie can slump.  However, the tenacity of the subjects is infectious, ensuring that the finale is one that is worth bearing witness to.


Fjord
⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre:  Drama
Director:  Cristian Mungiu
Starring:  Sebastian Stan, Renate Reinsve


Sebastian Stan continues to push himself into roles where he proves himself to be a chameleon in this drama, where he plays a Christian Romanian man married to arthouse darling (and previous A Different Man co-star) Renate Reinsve and the couple moves their family to Norway.  Freshly relocated, the couple's strict conservative values come under scrutiny when child protective services are called when second-hand accounts of them spanking their children is reported as child abuse.

Look.  It's complicated.

Fjord is a movie that examines a lot of conservative and progressive ideals and it's the rare film that treats them both with fairness and respect.  Whether or not Stan and Reinsve are abusive is a matter of perspective, but it should be noted that a lot of what they're accused of is not actually witnessed.  There are accounts from their children, but it also feels as if they are not allowed to speak for themselves, and when they do, their words are interpreted rather than understood.  There is a fine line between discipline and abuse, which brings up the question of where it is drawn and how do we define it.  A lot of this has to do with idealistic scrutiny, with there being a gap between family values and seeing the differences as a harshness that demands to be answered for.  Judging a family for using a spanking as a form of punishment is one thing, but bringing up evidence that the family doesn't allow their children to use cell phones or play video games is an irrelevance that is used to portray them in a negative light.  That's not abuse.  That's an upbringing and lifestyle choice.  In my eyes, the most abusive act that I interpreted happens late in the movie and wasn't physical at all, being an act of forcing emotional repression rather than anything hands-on.

It's brilliantly nuanced stuff, and the movie is more compelling than most movies that try to portray a similar type of story, because most movies like this are faith productions that feed into a Christian persecution complex.  But compared to what type of movie would have been made by a Christian group, this is a far more realistic portrayal and actually genuinely could generate sympathy from a non-Christian audience.  It's a portrayal of a sensibility gap leading to a misunderstanding, judgment by people who bore limited witness, and the frustrating coldness of legal impartiality leading to a feeling of cruelty than a full persecution, which makes it more interesting than the more tired "atheists hate us because we exist" argument.  The movie is frustrating because the simple solution is more efficient communication and understanding, but there are also no easy answers and it has none to offer.  But it's also asking the right questions.


The Only Living Pickpocket in New York
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Drama, Thriller
Director:  Noah Segan
Starring:  John Turturro, Giancarlo Esposito, Will Price, Tatiana Maslany, Steve Buscemi,  Jamie Lee Curtis


John Turturro plays an aged pickpocket who unknowingly lifts a USB card off of some dangerous people, who threaten to kill his catatonic wife if he doesn't return it, promising they'll only kill him if he does.  While that premise sounds like it's setting up excitement, The Only Living Pickpocket in New York uses it to set up life contemplation.  Tutrurro's character doesn't really fight his promised fate, opting to use the time he is given to retrieve the card as one would spend his final hours, looking back at the life they were given, and thinking about the mistakes made and also a few things about old dogs in a new age.  Sometimes the film struggles to really hit a beat, as our main character seems to waive off urgency and dawdle when he can, but the movie tells its story reasonably well.  It isn't terribly profound, as it covers ground a lot of dramas have covered before and will again, but Turturro gives a strong, quiet performance that leads with his eyes.  He gives the movie the heart it needs and it uses him to its advantage.

Movies Still Playing At My Theater
Clayface ⭐️⭐️1/2
Forgotten Island ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Heart of the Beast ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Other Mommy ⭐️1/2
Resident Evil ⭐️⭐️
Sense and Sensibility ⭐️⭐️1/2
Spider-Man:  Brand New Day ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Street Fighter ⭐️⭐️
Verity ⭐️
Whalefall ⭐️⭐️1/2
Wicker ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Wildwood ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
You Can See Everything ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2

New To Digital
The Dog Stars ⭐️⭐️
Forgotten Island ⭐️⭐️⭐️
The Stunt Driver ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Verity ⭐️

New To Physical
Frankenstein ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Skincare ⭐️⭐️1/2

Coming Soon!

Friday, October 30, 2026

RE03-The Mummy Theme Park


The fine folks at RiffTrax have kindly asked those of us who are watching this through the Best Friends service to not spoil the movie being used in this episode for those who won't see it until next week.  I'm doing my best to honor that, but this puts me into a conundrum  because I can't properly review this episode without talking about the movie.  Consider this paragraph a SPOILER WARNING buffer to throw off those who are just passing by at a glance.

Please enjoy this photo of Clara from Doctor Who in various poses to pad out this upper section.


You're welcome.

Need more buffer?  Here are the opening credits to the 1999 syndicated television series Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's The Lost World.


AND NOW, OUR FEATURE PRESENTATION.

YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.

NO, REALLY, THE REVIEW STARTS RIGHT NOW.


Film Year:  2000
Genre:  Fantasy, Horror, Adventure, Comedy
Director:  Alvaro Pesseri
Starring:  Adam O'Neil, Holly Laningham, Cyrus Elias, Helen Preest, Peter Boom
MST Season:  The RiffTrax Experiments

The Movie

Leave it to RiffTrax to gain control of Mystery Science Theater 3000 for a handful of episodes and just throw in the most RiffTrax movie to ever be featured on the show.  This also happens to be the first movie from the decade of the 2000's featured on MST3K, stealing that title from the proposed Season 14 movie Ballistica, though that movie's release date came with an asterisk (that movie's dates of release range from 2009 to 2011 in different countries), so it's good to have one that is solidly in that decade.  Even if it is something that is almost indescribable in every way.  It's movies like this that make a Mystery Science Theater blog a chore.

::Richard Attenborough voice:: Welcome to the Mummy Theme Park!


The story of this bizarre Italian video production is that a descendant of Cleopatra prays to the god Osiris to unearth an ancient tomb that will return the hayday of ancient Egypt to power.  A Middle Eastern tycoon then finds the tomb and turns it into a theme park attraction, complete with mummies that he has scientists augmenting with robotics and gizmos to make it look alive (I want my family to do the same thing with my corpse after I'm dead).  Through various acts of sabotage and malfunction, the mummies wreak havoc on the park and all two of its guests.  The premise is very Westworld.  They even throw in a reference to that other malfunctioning park Michael Crichton property, Jurassic Park.  I can only imagine all of this is on purpose, because if this movie happened by accident, then that makes it even more astounding than it already is.


I don't know if I can adequately sum this movie up.  This movie feels like a Cinemax softcore porno that suddenly lost the budget for the sex scenes and decided to pad itself out to try and trick people into thinking it's a real movie.  But that also feels like an insult to softcore porn, because porn at least has a tangible background.  Most of this movie has this weird rear-projection effect, where actors are standing in front of a screen and the backdrop is just added in.  This is how a lot of expensive movies are made nowadays, but back then, it was a sign your movie had no money so you had to pretend you had a set.  The weird thing is that Mummy Theme Park is very inconsistent about this.  There are a couple of elaborate gore sequences that seem to either be lifted from an entirely different movie or were filmed first and drained all the cash from the budget.  There are also some production design when the movie does actually have a set, but the settings all appear to be cheaply made and shoddy, and these are all sandwiched in between the projected set nonsense that litters most of the movie.


Ignoring the production itself, it's hard to pinpoint what this movie actually thinks it is.  I think it's trying to be trashy fun in a Roger Corman spirit, but this group of MST episodes did it no favors in sandwiching it in between two actual Corman productions.  Corman movies are made fast, cheaply, and are mostly nonsense, but they are made by people who know how to make a movie.  I wouldn't even compare this to an Asylum film, because the difference between this and Atlantic Rim is that Atlantic Rim at least pretended to have a story.  And if we're comparing movies made with no money, Demon Squad had script ambition and production problem-solving cleverness.  Mummy Theme Park has none of these virtues.  It feels made by people who don't know what they're doing and they made a movie that has limited energy to actually do anything.


It might be trying to be a parody of those patented Crichton theme-park-gone-amok stories, but it's not really that funny.  You can tell there are jokes.  The main characters are so aimless and dimwitted that it has to be intentional.  There are also a trio of harem girls who like to smack each other around in scanty clothing, like a Penthouse production of The Three Stooges.  There are also some jokes that are very similar to gags that were featured on The Simpsons.  One of the mummies' rampages is based on camera flashes, which has echoes of The Simpsons' own Westworld parody in Itchy & Scratchy Land.  There is also a very odd scene where a mummy becomes sexually aroused by our lady lead's breasts, which is almost an exact duplicate of a joke from the fake Simpsons movie trailer "Soccer Mummy."  I first thought that this had to be a Simpsons reference because it's literally the exact same joke, but I double checked the dates and the Simpsons episode actually aired two years after this.  I highly doubt the Simpsons writers saw this movie, so we'll chalk it down to parallel thought.


If I were to project any sort of purpose onto this flick, one thing I noticed is that the film could possibly be viewed as a commentary of the commercialization of culture and heritage and being a harsh portrayal of cultural appropriation via tourism.  I don't think this movie did that on purpose.  Maybe it did.  Maybe this is what the filmmakers wanted to get across the whole time and they just didn't have the resources to properly communicate it.  But what chews away at that is how meandering the film is, not going anywhere half the time and dawdling on weird racial portrayals and nudity (which is censored out of the MST version).  The movie didn't even think to give itself a title card.  And I checked the uncut version on Tubi.  It doesn't have one.  We can't blame the episode this time.  If basic film courtesies like this are being tossed to the side then I don't think this movie is doing much by design and is just playing it by ear.


The Episode

The Mummy Theme Park was the big mystery title of the season and I'm not sure what I expected, but I wasn't expecting this.  This movie is a level of Z-grade bad that the MST3K rarely delves into.  It's beneath Incredibly Strange Creatures and probably even tops Manos and Monster A-Go Go levels of "Why does this exist?"  That said, this batch of MST3K is called "The RiffTrax Experiments," and RiffTrax has a knack for finding absolute bottom-of-your-shoe garbage, prying it off, and feeding it to us.  If this is a genuine crossover between the two entities, then perhaps we needed a movie like this.  Mummy Theme Park is actually from the director of Flight to Hell, which was featured on RiffTrax last year.  It's curious that they used this for an MST3K episode when it has a level of establishment already housed on RiffTrax, but let's not get pedantic about this.  They clearly saw something interesting in this movie's inconsistent madness and decided to put it on a pedestal.  I can't say I blame them.  The only issue is that I'm not sure the movie lives up to the mystery hype that is surrounding it.  One would almost expect it to be something special.  If one is familiar with RiffTrax's catalog, you'd know that there is nothing special about this movie.  They have arguably done much worse and more amusingly stupid.


The riffing rebounded for me in this episode.  I was not smitten with the choices they had made in Deathsport, but there is a lot of freshness here.  It's probably because the movie is more refreshingly weird than we've been seeing, which inspires more variety.  Oddly, the riffers don't spend much time commenting on the movie's shoddy effects work.  They almost seem more amused by just how weird the movie is.  Because the riffers seem to think this movie is funny, the approach to this movie can feel a little soft.  There are good reactionary riffs at several points, as the film can take them by surprise as to where it's going to go at any given moment because there is goofy monster mayhem one minute and in the next the movie has moved on to broad racial depictions that are poorly dubbed and almost less offensive because they've been rendered incoherent.  One of my favorite riffs in this episode mocks how Mummy Theme Park looks like a Saudi palace, prompting Servo to sing 🎶"Prince Ali, fabulous he, whoops we're in Egypt!"🎶  That was probably the hardest I've laughed at any of these RiffTrax episodes so far.  I also quite enjoyed the mockery of the mummy arousal scene, as the mummy gazes lustfully after the object of his desire, and Crow asks "Are you Rachel Weisz?"

Speaking as someone who grew up with a crush on Rachel Weisz...no.  No, she is not.


The host segments are the best of the batch so far.  I quite enjoyed Servo excavating the Sarcophagus of his own grandfather, which begs the question of whether this grandfather is the one married to his grandmother in Touch of Satan.  Crow and Bobo get into a Wiki flame war, which is aggressive hilarity, and Pearl takes a cue from the movie and tries to summon Osiris to heed her call.  I don't think there was a wasted minute outside of the theater.  However, inside of the theater, I do have one hiccup.


Probably the big thing that makes me feel like there is a roadblock in the comedy of this episode is that this movie is too slow.  It meanders for about fifty minutes before finally offering up some violence.  I'm assuming the uncut version had some nudity to soften the blow of this, but this episode censors it and makes it feel more drawn out.  The movie's weirdness can only push the needle so much.  We had gotten halfway through the episode and I felt like I hadn't watched anything.  Because of that, I'm feeling more muted about this one than I want to be.  It's certainly a silly time, but I think the high point of these special episodes is still Sting of Death.  Mummy Theme Park is a big swing for the fences, though.  I respect the play, but it's a triple and not a homer.

⭐️⭐️⭐️
Good


Monday, October 26, 2026

Cinema Playground Journal 2026: Week 43 (My Cinema Playground)

Multiplex Madness


Clayface
⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre:  Horror, Thriller, Superhero
Director:  James Watkins
Starring:  Tom Rhys Harries, Naomi Ackie, David Dencik, Max Minghella, Eddie Marsan


Doing a Clayface movie is certainly...a choice.  I don't know if I would have done it, but I have fond memories of Batman:  The Animated Series episodes featuring the gooey villain, so I'll go in with an open mind.  This is third Batman villain they've spun off into their own solo movie, following Catwoman and Joker.  I don't know if that brings any confidence, but that first Joker movie is better than any of the Spider-Man villain movies that Sony tried to push in the last decade.  And Catwoman was also worse, so it balances out.  And Joker 2 wasn't very good either.  I'm rambling.  Sorry.  Anyway, solo villain movies.  More bad than good.

Based on the not-too-well-known villain character, Clayface is the story of Matt Hagen, a famous actor who crosses paths with a mob boss who disfigured his face.  Desperate to regain what he lost, Hagen turns to an experimental procedure to reconstruct his face back to the handsome lad he was.  Some side effects may occur, including, face melting, shape-shifting, and impotence probably (I think it's safe to say).  The whole thing is an excuse for his face to melt and put on the guise of other people in a simple revenge plot.  It's like an unofficial remake of Darkman, but a little more mid.

The movie advertises itself as being gross-out body horror, which it both is and isn't.  There are body horror elements, but less than you would think.  Most of the gooey stuff is pretty plainly CGI, which lessens the impact of a lot of it, while most of the shape-shift scenes happen in an instant, slightly obscured in a frame cut.  Some of them are cleverly edited but so fast that it doesn't really sink in half the time.  The editing is really the only aspect of this movie that left me queasy, as it's the most stylized aspect of the movie.  The body horror element would benefit from a less static filming style.  A lot of movie is just a straight shot of a CGI face melt.  It's entertaining, mostly because the revenge thriller aspect makes up for the body horror failures, but it's also not something I'd recommend people rush out to see because it's not successful at the main things it wants to do.

My final thoughts leaving this movie are mostly unrelated to the movie itself.  Honestly, the thing that kept nagging at me was that if James Gunn needs to reconsider one thing about his approach to the DC Universe, I'd suggest that he keep in mind that the key to superhero properties thriving is appeal to youngsters.  Thusfar, the majority of his projects at DC Studios have targeted adults, with TV shows Creature Commandos, Peacemaker, and Lanterns all securing an TV-MA rating and the third film in his universe being a body horror movie that garnered an R.  The only projects parents can share with their children have been Superman and Supergirl, and, frankly, the latter was probably too dour for an actual family sit-down.  He's targeting nerds in their 40's, which is my demographic, but if they really want a DC franchise to build itself, this is not going to do it.  That's one of the reasons Zack Snyder failed.  The other reason was that his movies were bad.  I have hopes of seeing him succeed, but projects like Clayface aren't reassuring.


Klara and the Sun
⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre:  Comedy, Science Fiction
Director:  Taika Watiti
Starring:  Jenna Ortega, Amy Adams, Mia Tharia, Aran Murphy, Steve Buscemi, Natasha Lyonne


In this house we only acknowledge one "Clara" played by a woman named Jenna.


Klara and the Sun is based on the novel by Kazou Ishiguro, which I have yet to read.  I had it loaded on my Audible account but I just ran out of time.  But the most negative reviews of the film adaptation seemed to come from people who read the book, so I'll confess to being a little relieved that I'm coming into this movie with fresh eyes and zero baggage.  The film adaptation is handed to Taika Watiti, who I can run hot and cold on.  I love Jojo Rabbit.  I don't particularly care for Thor:  Ragnarok.  Ya'know, basic personal taste stuff.  I tend to like his movies when his style enhances the story instead of undercutting it.  Klara and the Sun does both, and its frustrating.

In the film, Klara is a robot companion who is purchased by a sick girl as a live-in friend, of which Klara learns about life, love, and loss.  Jenna Ortega plays this role flawlessly.  If there is one thing about this movie that earns endless praise, it's her.  When it focuses on Ortega clumsily walking around, taking in the world around her, the film is a whimsical treat.  Klara has her own worldview based on the simple things she has learned, and has even created her own mythology.  She has her own version of god and her own version of the devil.  And she sticks to her few personality traits, which are curiosity and empathy.  It's pointed out that her model was discontinued because they were programed with too much empathy, to which she responds "Oh.  I'm sorry."  Perfect.

The movie could coast on being a simple tale of friendship and it would be a cute family movie.  When it tries for something more existential, it feels like its ambition is exceeding its grasp.  It feels like a switch is flipped halfway through the movie and what was making the movie charming stops being fun.  The ideas that its playing with are interesting, but they also feel sudden and underdeveloped.  I don't know if this is a fault to Watiti's approach to the material, but there are times where you notice little moments that give you a lingering thought of "Oh, that shouldn't have been a joke" or "Oh, that robbed the movie of the moment it was aiming for."  Klara and the Sun aims to be a wonderful feel-good movie.  It has heart.  It just didn't keep it beating.


A Talent for Murder
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Thriller
Director:  Anton Corbjin
Starring:  Helen Mirren, Alden Ehrenreich, Olivia Cooke, Juliet Stevenson


A Talent for Murder is based on the stage play "Switzerland," which portrayed a fictionalized version of author Patricia Highsmith, whose most famous thriller works include Strangers on a Train and The Talented Mr. Ripley.  In the film, Alden Ehrenreich plays a publishing representative who tries to talk Highsmith, played by Helen Mirren, into signing a new deal.  Together, the duo outline a sixth book featuring her most famous creation, Tom Ripley, concocting a plot to marry a trust fund heiress and murder his in-laws.

Mirren mostly acts as a combative narrator, someone relating the story through a foul temper while everyone around her acts out her little story.  The movie can strangely be interpreted as a power fantasy in this way, as characters gain new, more assured attributes through her brash tale.  Most of the main cast play dual roles, with Ehrenreich getting the jucier parts.  He gets to contrast his anxious main character with a more devious fantasy of Tom Ripley, and he is quite captivating in the switch.  Olivia Cooke plays the role of the sexual desire of both characters, though her role isn't starkly different in either version, which feels like a little bit of a waste.  A Talent for Murder is a fun and slightly demented reality-bending tale, though.  Worth watching if you want a dark story with performers who are giving it everything.


Wicker
⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre:  Comedy, Fantasy, Romance
Director:  Alex Huston Fischer, Eleonor Wilson
Starring:  Olivia Colman, Alexander Skarsgård, Peter Dinklage, Elizabeth Debicki, Marli Siu, Nabhaan Rizwan, Richard E. Grant, Ben Ashenden


Olivia Colman plays a lonely fisherwoman who lives in a cottage by herself.  She tasks wicker craftsman Peter Dinklage to "make a husband" for her, which he proceeds to go above and beyond by creating a living wicker man, Alexander Skarsgård, for all of her needs, both in daily life and in nights of sexual gratification.  Personally, I'd be concerned with the friction of making it with a wicker person.  All that lubeless rubbing is going to set one's loins on fire and not in a good way.  But, we just take it at face value that wicker husband is an amazing lover.  I have a thousand questions of how that works and the movie answers none of them.  It doesn't even answer how Dinklage gave him life.  The movie doesn't care about that, it just cares that he exists and he knows his way down there.

The movie is like beginner level idiosyncrasy for those who are trying to ease their way into lopsided cinema without going full Yorgos Lanthimos.  The movie is weird and quirky, but also more heartfelt than you'd expect.  The film has a lot to express about love, both in its purest form and its most superficial.  Skarsgård's wicker husband is a being who only exists to love Colman, which Colman is both enchanted by and distrustful of, based on experiences with more complicated human folk.  Meanwhile, their relationship grows eyes of the envious, as Skarsgård brings Colman joy in a way few married couples achieve.  It's idealism and reality going to war in an off-beat and funny little package.


Wildwood
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Fantasy, Adventure
Director:  Travis Knight
Starring:  Carey Mulligan, Peyton Elizabeth Lee, Jacob Tremblay, Richard E. Grant, Awkwafina, Amandla Stenberg, Tom Waits, Charlie Day, Blythe Danner, Arthur Knight, Angela Bassett, Mahershala Ali


If I were a betting man, I would probably put good money on this year being Laika's time to finally take home the Best Animated Feature Film trophy at the Oscars, which feels overdue for the beloved studio (every film they have made has been nominated and lost to Disney/Pixar).  Wildwood is head-and-shoulders above any other animated film I've seen this year, and most of the ones I have seen this decade.  Based on the fantasy novel series, Wildwood tells the story of a young girl whose brother is whisked away by a murder of crows into a magical forest, and she ventures forth to retrieve him.  She comes into conflict with the governess of the woods, who plans to sacrifice her brother to find her dead son, whose body was lost in the wilderness.

Wildwood is a dark fairy tale that echos Guillermo del Toro and Hayao Miyazaki, with hints of classic Walt Disney, specifically projects like Pinocchio and Alice in Wonderland, and C.S. Lewis's Chronicles of Narnia.  As a work of "stranger in a strange land" fantasy, Wildwood is practically flawless.  Adventurous, whimsical, hectic, vicious, and heartfelt, the movie is always in motion and providing something new for the eyes to feast upon, aided by some of the most smooth and expressive stop-motion ever attempted.  The movie is a breathtaking masterwork, utilizing a stunning realization of its setting and littered with three-dimensional characters.  Even our villain, who has a horrific goal, has a story of sorrow that is difficult to not feel sympathy for.  Meanwhile, our young heroes are youthful and plucky, bringing levity when the film needs to be fun, but are also courageous when the film needs to be harrowing.  The movie is pretty much summed up in one line:

"I don't know if this is terrifying or adorable."

The movie is also very violent, so parents may want to heed the PG-13 rating before bringing very young children.  Wildwood is not above bloodshed, peril, and sudden death of main characters, and there were several parents at my screening walking out with their young children, likely surprised at how graphic and unrelenting the film is.  It's the whimsical spirit of Andrew Adamson's Narnia films intemingled with the serious reverence for its world of Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings trilogy.  It's a fantasy film for fantasy lovers, and while it's animated, it's not a children's film.

Netflix & Chill


The Cycle
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Streaming On:  Shudder
Genre:  Horror, Mystery
Director:  Jordan Downey
Starring:  Deborah Ann Woll, Jeffery Donovan, Gretchen Corbett, Phillip Andre Botello, Will Hochman


MSTie queen Deborah Ann Woll stars in this new thriller on Shudder, where she plays a forensics investigator whose estranged father's mummified corpse is found at a murder scene.  She joins the investigation, hoping to find answers to why he left years earlier, only to find some scary shit at the end of the trail.  It's probably best to go in blind, but I'd also say it's easy to figure out what's going on after about a half-hour.  That doesn't really hurt it, because the investigation itself maintains moody intrigue.  Woll is pretty good, as she usually is, and her personal connection to the questions that she's trying to find answers to keep the the film alive.  The third act doesn't quite live up to the set-up, now with the twist in full force.  Some of this has to do with stiff effects work and obscured quick-cutting around limitations.  I like that they took a swing though, even if it isn't as bone-chilling as it wants it to be.  The Cycle is an engaging little chiller, even if it dwindles as it goes.

Movies Still Playing At My Theater
Digger ⭐️
Forgotten Island ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Heart of the Beast ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Other Mommy ⭐️1/2
Resident Evil ⭐️⭐️
Sense and Sensibility ⭐️⭐️1/2
Spider-Man:  Brand New Day ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Street Fighter ⭐️⭐️
Verity ⭐️
Whalefall ⭐️⭐️1/2
You Can See Everything ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2

New To Digital
By Any Means ⭐️⭐️
Hope ⭐️⭐️⭐️
The Weight ⭐️⭐️⭐️

New To Physical
The Brink of War ⭐️⭐️
I Want Your Sex ⭐️⭐️1/2
Masters of the Universe ⭐️⭐️1/2
One Night Only ⭐️⭐️
Over Your Dead Body ⭐️⭐️1/2

Coming Soon!
.