Multiplex Madness
Clayface
⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre: Horror, Thriller, Superhero
Director: James Watkins
Starring: Tom Rhys Harries, Naomi Ackie, David Dencik, Max Minghella, Eddie Marsan
Doing a Clayface movie is certainly...a choice. I don't know if I would have done it, but I have fond memories of Batman: The Animated Series episodes featuring the gooey villain, so I'll go in with an open mind. This is third Batman villain they've spun off into their own solo movie, following Catwoman and Joker. I don't know if that brings any confidence, but that first Joker movie is better than any of the Spider-Man villain movies that Sony tried to push in the last decade. And Catwoman was also worse, so it balances out. And Joker 2 wasn't very good either. I'm rambling. Sorry. Anyway, solo villain movies. More bad than good.
Based on the not-too-well-known villain character, Clayface is the story of Matt Hagen, a famous actor who crosses paths with a mob boss who disfigured his face. Desperate to regain what he lost, Hagen turns to an experimental procedure to reconstruct his face back to the handsome lad he was. Some side effects may occur, including, face melting, shape-shifting, and impotence probably (I think it's safe to say). The whole thing is an excuse for his face to melt and put on the guise of other people in a simple revenge plot. It's like an unofficial remake of Darkman, but a little more mid.
The movie advertises itself as being gross-out body horror, which it both is and isn't. There are body horror elements, but less than you would think. Most of the gooey stuff is pretty plainly CGI, which lessens the impact of a lot of it, while most of the shape-shift scenes happen in an instant, slightly obscured in a frame cut. Some of them are cleverly edited but so fast that it doesn't really sink in half the time. The editing is really the only aspect of this movie that left me queasy, as it's the most stylized aspect of the movie. The body horror element would benefit from a less static filming style. A lot of movie is just a straight shot of a CGI face melt. It's entertaining, mostly because the revenge thriller aspect makes up for the body horror failures, but it's also not something I'd recommend people rush out to see because it's not successful at the main things it wants to do.
My final thoughts leaving this movie are mostly unrelated to the movie itself. Honestly, the thing that kept nagging at me was that if James Gunn needs to reconsider one thing about his approach to the DC Universe, I'd suggest that he keep in mind that the key to superhero properties thriving is appeal to youngsters. Thusfar, the majority of his projects at DC Studios have targeted adults, with TV shows Creature Commandos, Peacemaker, and Lanterns all securing an TV-MA rating and the third film in his universe being a body horror movie that garnered an R. The only projects parents can share with their children have been Superman and Supergirl, and, frankly, the latter was probably too dour for an actual family sit-down. He's targeting nerds in their 40's, which is my demographic, but if they really want a DC franchise to build itself, this is not going to do it. That's one of the reasons Zack Snyder failed. The other reason was that his movies were bad. I have hopes of seeing him succeed, but projects like Clayface aren't reassuring.
⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre: Comedy, Science Fiction
Director: Taika Watiti
Starring: Jenna Ortega, Amy Adams, Mia Tharia, Aran Murphy, Steve Buscemi, Natasha Lyonne
In this house we only acknowledge one "Clara" played by a woman named Jenna.
Klara and the Sun is based on the novel by Kazou Ishiguro, which I have yet to read. I had it loaded on my Audible account but I just ran out of time. But the most negative reviews of the film adaptation seemed to come from people who read the book, so I'll confess to being a little relieved that I'm coming into this movie with fresh eyes and zero baggage. The film adaptation is handed to Taika Watiti, who I can run hot and cold on. I love Jojo Rabbit. I don't particularly care for Thor: Ragnarok. Ya'know, basic personal taste stuff. I tend to like his movies when his style enhances the story instead of undercutting it. Klara and the Sun does both, and its frustrating.
In the film, Klara is a robot companion who is purchased by a sick girl as a live-in friend, of which Klara learns about life, love, and loss. Jenna Ortega plays this role flawlessly. If there is one thing about this movie that earns endless praise, it's her. When it focuses on Ortega clumsily walking around, taking in the world around her, the film is a whimsical treat. Klara has her own worldview based on the simple things she has learned, and has even created her own mythology. She has her own version of god and her own version of the devil. And she sticks to her few personality traits, which are curiosity and empathy. It's pointed out that her model was discontinued because they were programed with too much empathy, to which she responds "Oh. I'm sorry." Perfect.
The movie could coast on being a simple tale of friendship and it would be a cute family movie. When it tries for something more existential, it feels like its ambition is exceeding its grasp. It feels like a switch is flipped halfway through the movie and what was making the movie charming stops being fun. The ideas that its playing with are interesting, but they also feel sudden and underdeveloped. I don't know if this is a fault to Watiti's approach to the material, but there are times where you notice little moments that give you a lingering thought of "Oh, that shouldn't have been a joke" or "Oh, that robbed the movie of the moment it was aiming for." Klara and the Sun aims to be a wonderful feel-good movie. It has heart. It just didn't keep it beating.
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Genre: Thriller
Director: Anton Corbjin
Starring: Helen Mirren, Alden Ehrenreich, Olivia Cooke, Juliet Stevenson
A Talent for Murder is based on the stage play "Switzerland," which portrayed a fictionalized version of author Patricia Highsmith, whose most famous thriller works include Strangers on a Train and The Talented Mr. Ripley. In the film, Alden Ehrenreich plays a publishing representative who tries to talk Highsmith, played by Helen Mirren, into signing a new deal. Together, the duo outline a sixth book featuring her most famous creation, Tom Ripley, concocting a plot to marry a trust fund heiress and murder his in-laws.
Mirren mostly acts as a combative narrator, someone relating the story through a foul temper while everyone around her acts out her little story. The movie can strangely be interpreted as a power fantasy in this way, as characters gain new, more assured attributes through her brash tale. Most of the main cast play dual roles, with Ehrenreich getting the jucier parts. He gets to contrast his anxious main character with a more devious fantasy of Tom Ripley, and he is quite captivating in the switch. Olivia Cooke plays the role of the sexual desire of both characters, though her role isn't starkly different in either version, which feels like a little bit of a waste. A Talent for Murder is a fun and slightly demented reality-bending tale, though. Worth watching if you want a dark story with performers who are giving it everything.
⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre: Comedy, Fantasy, Romance
Director: Alex Huston Fischer, Eleonor Wilson
Starring: Olivia Colman, Alexander Skarsgård, Peter Dinklage, Elizabeth Debicki, Marli Siu, Nabhaan Rizwan, Richard E. Grant, Ben Ashenden
Olivia Colman plays a lonely fisherwoman who lives in a cottage by herself. She tasks wicker craftsman Peter Dinklage to "make a husband" for her, which he proceeds to go above and beyond by creating a living wicker man, Alexander Skarsgård, for all of her needs, both in daily life and in nights of sexual gratification. Personally, I'd be concerned with the friction of making it with a wicker person. All that lubeless rubbing is going to set one's loins on fire and not in a good way. But, we just take it at face value that wicker husband is an amazing lover. I have a thousand questions of how that works and the movie answers none of them. It doesn't even answer how Dinklage gave him life. The movie doesn't care about that, it just cares that he exists and he knows his way down there.
The movie is like beginner level idiosyncrasy for those who are trying to ease their way into lopsided cinema without going full Yorgos Lanthimos. The movie is weird and quirky, but also more heartfelt than you'd expect. The film has a lot to express about love, both in its purest form and its most superficial. Skarsgård's wicker husband is a being who only exists to love Colman, which Colman is both enchanted by and distrustful of, based on experiences with more complicated human folk. Meanwhile, their relationship grows eyes of the envious, as Skarsgård brings Colman joy in a way few married couples achieve. It's idealism and reality going to war in an off-beat and funny little package.
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Genre: Fantasy, Adventure
Director: Travis Knight
Starring: Carey Mulligan, Peyton Elizabeth Lee, Jacob Tremblay, Richard E. Grant, Awkwafina, Amandla Stenberg, Tom Waits, Charlie Day, Blythe Danner, Arthur Knight, Angela Bassett, Mahershala Ali
If I were a betting man, I would probably put good money on this year being Laika's time to finally take home the Best Animated Feature Film trophy at the Oscars, which feels overdue for the beloved studio (every film they have made has been nominated and lost to Disney/Pixar). Wildwood is head-and-shoulders above any other animated film I've seen this year, and most of the ones I have seen this decade. Based on the fantasy novel series, Wildwood tells the story of a young girl whose brother is whisked away by a murder of crows into a magical forest, and she ventures forth to retrieve him. She comes into conflict with the governess of the woods, who plans to sacrifice her brother to find her dead son, whose body was lost in the wilderness.
Wildwood is a dark fairy tale that echos Guillermo del Toro and Hayao Miyazaki, with hints of classic Walt Disney, specifically projects like Pinocchio and Alice in Wonderland, and C.S. Lewis's Chronicles of Narnia. As a work of "stranger in a strange land" fantasy, Wildwood is practically flawless. Adventurous, whimsical, hectic, vicious, and heartfelt, the movie is always in motion and providing something new for the eyes to feast upon, aided by some of the most smooth and expressive stop-motion ever attempted. The movie is a breathtaking masterwork, utilizing a stunning realization of its setting and littered with three-dimensional characters. Even our villain, who has a horrific goal, has a story of sorrow that is difficult to not feel sympathy for. Meanwhile, our young heroes are youthful and plucky, bringing levity when the film needs to be fun, but are also courageous when the film needs to be harrowing. The movie is pretty much summed up in one line:
"I don't know if this is terrifying or adorable."
The movie is also very violent, so parents may want to heed the PG-13 rating before bringing very young children. Wildwood is not above bloodshed, peril, and sudden death of main characters, and there were several parents at my screening walking out with their young children, likely surprised at how graphic and unrelenting the film is. It's the whimsical spirit of Andrew Adamson's Narnia films intemingled with the serious reverence for its world of Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings trilogy. It's a fantasy film for fantasy lovers, and while it's animated, it's not a children's film.
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Streaming On: Shudder
Genre: Horror, Mystery
Director: Jordan Downey
Starring: Deborah Ann Woll, Jeffery Donovan, Gretchen Corbett, Phillip Andre Botello, Will Hochman
MSTie queen Deborah Ann Woll stars in this new thriller on Shudder, where she plays a forensics investigator whose estranged father's mummified corpse is found at a murder scene. She joins the investigation, hoping to find answers to why he left years earlier, only to find some scary shit at the end of the trail. It's probably best to go in blind, but I'd also say it's easy to figure out what's going on after about a half-hour. That doesn't really hurt it, because the investigation itself maintains moody intrigue. Woll is pretty good, as she usually is, and her personal connection to the questions that she's trying to find answers to keep the the film alive. The third act doesn't quite live up to the set-up, now with the twist in full force. Some of this has to do with stiff effects work and obscured quick-cutting around limitations. I like that they took a swing though, even if it isn't as bone-chilling as it wants it to be. The Cycle is an engaging little chiller, even if it dwindles as it goes.
Movies Still Playing At My Theater
Digger ⭐️
Forgotten Island ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Heart of the Beast ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Other Mommy ⭐️1/2
Resident Evil ⭐️⭐️
Sense and Sensibility ⭐️⭐️1/2
Spider-Man: Brand New Day ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Street Fighter ⭐️⭐️
Verity ⭐️
Whalefall ⭐️⭐️1/2
You Can See Everything ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
New To Digital
By Any Means ⭐️⭐️
Hope ⭐️⭐️⭐️
The Weight ⭐️⭐️⭐️
New To Physical
The Brink of War ⭐️⭐️
I Want Your Sex ⭐️⭐️1/2
Masters of the Universe ⭐️⭐️1/2
One Night Only ⭐️⭐️
Over Your Dead Body ⭐️⭐️1/2
Coming Soon!
.































