Monday, August 31, 2026

Cinema Playground Journal 2026: Week 35 (My Cinema Playground)

Multiplex Madness


Buddy
⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre:  Horror, Comedy, Fantasy
Director:  Casper Kelly
Starring:  Cristin Milioti, Delaney Quinn, Patton Oswalt, Michael Shannon, Topher Grace, Keegan-Michael Key


We can't have nice things.  All of childhood must be weaponized into something dark and deranged by the horror genre at some point, because we can't allow innocence and all that is good must be corrupted.  This movie takes place in a backyard straight out of a PBS children's show, where a group of kids play with their magical stuffed unicorn pal, Buddy.  The children slowly begin to realize that they might actually be prisoners and Buddy is actually a violent monster feeding off of their love.  Obviously, the movie is a play on that Barney stereotype of preschooler show, showcasing it as a sterile purgatory that one's senses recognize as fakery.  The film uses this as a hurdle for a bizarre fantasy survival scenario for children, as it's leans into being a weird combination between a Grimm fairy tale and a really out-there Goosebumps book.  It can experience slowdown as it stumbles upon its segmented format, but it's hard to be upset at a movie that is this proudly weird and off-center for too long.  The movie is not going to be for everybody, and its ending is more of a rambunctious explosion than a conclusion, but it felt to me like this movie was more about the weird journey than it is in telling a conventional tale.


Colony
⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre:  Horror
Director:  Yeon Sang-ho
Starring:  Jun Ji-hyun, Koo Kyo-hwan, Ji Cang-wook, Kim Shin-rok, Shin Hyun-been, Go Soo


I had the choice between sitting through a Christian rock musical for free or driving to a different theater and paying real money to see a Korean horror movie.  I made my decision and I stand by it.

Yeog Sang-ho is back with another zombie movie.  Considering he directed quite possibly the greatest zombie movie of all time with Train to Busan, that comes with lofty expectations.  But I'm willing to let him cook.  Colony takes place mostly confined to a building, where a biological attack infects people and they begin to attack everyone in their way.  They also begin to display insect-like attributes, seemingly communicating and working in a hive mind.  It's an interesting reinvention of the idea of a zombie movie, but it also comes at the cost of listing out its dense rulebook as it goes.  The amount of explanation required to understand everything almost makes one wish the movie came with an instruction manual.  Still, Sang-ho is a master in crafting set-pieces.  The movie has excellent sequences of suspense and the climax is genuinely spectacular.  And anybody who was impressed with the zombie choreography in Train to Busan will find a lot to admire here, which takes that craft to the next level.  The movie doesn't hit nearly as hard as Train to Busan but it's also not trying to be Train to Busan.  Train to Busan arguably wasn't even a horror movie.  Colony is a nastier movie through and through.  Yet, it's not as memorable.



Coyote vs. Acme
⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre:  Comedy
Director:  Dave Green
Starring:  Wile E. Coyote, Road Runner, Will Forte, Lana Condor, John Cena, Tone Bell, Luis Guzmán, Martha Kelly, P.J. Byrne, Eric Bauza, Kenneth Choi


I really hate that this movie is always going to have an asterisk next to its name.  Coyote vs. Acme is now famous for the notoriety of having been a movie that has escaped being forever vaulted by Warner Brothers as a tax write-off after their merger with Discovery Media.  This resulted in several movies being scrapped deep into post production, including Batgirl, Scoob:  Holiday Haunt, and nearly another Looney Tunes movie called The Day the Earth Blew Up, which Ketchup Entertainment released last year.  Ketchup also did its due diligence in acquiring Coyote vs. Acme, letting the world finally see what David Zaslav thought nobody wanted.  Oddly, the negative press for the near-junking of this film probably put more eyes on it than it would have gotten otherwise and the movie might now just be a focal point of supporting art and sticking it to the corporations that were partaking in activities that were both anti-artist and anti-consumer.  If a movie does its job correctly, a viewer shouldn't think positively of it out of spite.  Luckily, that shouldn't be the case here.  Creative, heartfelt, and wildly entertaining, Coyote vs. Acme comes the closest to replicating the magic of Who Framed Roger Rabbit that so many movies have been struggling to recreate for decades.

We all know the Road Runner cartoons.  Wile E. Coyote chases him, Road Runner runs, Wile E. Coyote fails, often with a weird gizmo exploding.  Those gizmos are normally made by the Acme Corporation.  Wile E. takes his frustrations to small-time lawyer Will Forte, where it balloons into a massive multimillion dollar lawsuit.  When one looks at the types of movies the Looney Tunes have done in the live-action/animation hybrid space, be it a Space Jam or a Back in Action, they're usually high-concept ideas that inject the Tunes into a big adventure.  Coyote vs. Acme scales that back and uses these cartoons as actual characters and not big personas littering a wacky narrative with jokes.  The film maps out an actual story and uses them to tell that story and enhance the satire, which is a refreshing novelty when it feels like the Looney Tunes haven't been used like this in a very long time.  It makes the movie feel like it has a purpose and isn't riding a gimmick.

I had always heard that this movie had a surprising heart at its center.  I wasn't sure how much I believed that, because it's difficult to graft emotional pull onto a character like Wile E. Coyote, who is a pretty big jerk.  But the movie is actually pretty smart about what his appeal is, as it makes a very interesting point about Wile E. Coyote's tenacity, showing him as an example of never giving up, even if you're used to failure.  Sometimes the coyote's more greedy attributes overwhelm the message the movie is going for, as he mostly just wants to use the trial as a giant trap to catch the Road Runner, but the movie does know how to use this character to his maximum potential and it follows through.  The fact that this nearly lost piece of media that we only got through popular demand has a message of living to fight for what you want is oddly perfect.

This is a great movie.  I'm not just saying that to justify what it took to release, nor from being a long-time lover of the Road Runner cartoons, it is legitimately one of the better movies I've seen this year.  People shouldn't just see it to thumb their noses at Warner; they should see it for its own merits, of which there are many.  Looney Tunes fans should see it because it's easily the best Looney Tunes movie ever made.  Families should see it because it's a ton of fun.  And we should all breathe a sigh of relief that it is here and we can enjoy it.


The Dog Stars
⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Drama, Thriller
Director:  Ridley Scott
Starring:  Jacob Elordi, Josh Brolin, Margaret Qualley, Guy Pearce


The Dog Stars is not a terribly interesting book, but it's more interesting than you'd assume by simply watching the film adaptation.  Jacob Elordi plays a widower who lost his wife during a pandemic who flies around in a little airplane and kills time with survivalist Josh Brolin.  He goes out flying to search for greener pastures, where he stumbles upon Margaret Qualley and father Guy Pearce living on their ranch.  Ultimately, the book uses a post-apocalyptic backdrop as an allegory for wallowing in greif.  The movie feels like it understands this but works surprisingly hard to stifle it.  I've never seen a movie try so hard to pretend it doesn't have a point.

In fairness, I do think a lot of the plot needed to be reworked.  The book is meandering and repetitive, turning in circles before progressing its story in any given direction, often feeling like it was written by someone whose favorite episodes of The Walking Dead are the boring mid-season ones where people glower around and nothing happens.  A lot of the plot points in this adaptation are simplified and gussied up as an action sequence to give the movie a bit more whiz-bang than just a story of a sad man who finally discovers the only woman in town and decides he's also really horny.  To my surprise, a lot of this comes at the expense of numbing the romance between Elordi and Qualley.  Considering that relationship pushes the entire theme of the story, one would think you would fight to keep that fleshed out.  Stripping it down makes your story feel like it has nowhere to go, and the movie leads to its greatest creative liberty in an action-packed third act that is more noise than payoff.  I'm not sure how good of a movie you could have made out of The Dog Stars but it certainly feels like they took their eyes off the ball.


Idiots
⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre:  Comedy
Director:  Macon Blair
Starring:  Dave Franco, O'Shea Jackson Jr., Mason Thames, Kiernan Shipka, Nicholas Braun, Peter Dinklage


Two losers are tasked with driving a spoiled rich kid to rehab in this comedy that is more brash than funny.  The movie's most positive attribute is that it escalates in ways that try to counter predictability.  Whether or not its smart plot progression is a matter of perspective, but it's not afraid to get bold, even if it's just bizarre.  It wears its brazzenness with confidence, and it's always good to see a comedy that is this sure of itself.  The problem is that the movie is very aggressive with its escalation, which boarders on being too unpleasant to be amusing.  I can't call this a bad movie but I also can't call it a good time.  I appreciated the effort to make a unique goofball of a movie, though.


It Ends
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Drama, Horror
Director:  Alexander Ullom
Starring:  Phinehas Yoon, Akira Jackson, Noah Toth, Mitchell Cole


I hope horror fans love psychological movies about purgatory because they are spoiled for choices this year, between this, Exit 8, and Backrooms.  It Ends hits the road with a quartet of friends who find themselves on an endless highway that seemingly has no destination, and they just drive into the distance hoping to find a way off.  I hate road trips too.  It's an experience of being trapped in a metal container with people you're somewhat fond of and slowly growing more irritated at them.  If It Ends let's down in its existential ambitions, at least it understands that part of life.  This movie can be proud that it's an excellent simulator of it.  It Ends seems to be an exploration of a group of people who are in a situation without reason, watching what hope they maintain and the eventual loss of it.  As to what's actually happening, the movie doesn't explain this.  It offers hypotheticals, but never an explanation.  The only aspect of this that's bothersome is that it offers a very specific set of rules that it demands its characters to follow, and also a vague notion of the things that happen outside of the car, but it offers little in the way of exploring itself other than just living with the characters.  It feels like there is more movie here and this is just a proof of concept.  But still, it's an interesting movie.  There's not enough here to fully resonate, but they took a swing at something big with very little resources and I respect that.

Art Attack


Finding Emily
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Comedy, Romance
Director:  Alicia MacDonald
Starring:  Angourie Rice, Spike Fearn, Minnie Driver


I saw Obsession seven times over the summer.  Every time I saw it, the last trailer during the opening previews was for Finding Emily, which was Focus Features' next big acquisition release, coincidentally also dealing with a "love obsession," albeit in a different way.  Finding Emily didn't make it to my multiplex, despite how very familiar I became with the trailer because they were showing it.  Maybe it'll expand next week, I don't know, but I felt like I needed closure to my Obsession experience.  So I drove down to my little arthouse and sat down with the daffy little romcom.

Finding Emily centers on Spike Fearn, a guy who meets an "Emily" at a club but is accidentally given an incorrect phone number.  He tries to find her on her college campus, and his stunts get more extravagant as he is encouraged by Angourie Rice, who who decides to study him for her psychology thesis without his knowledge.  It's high-concept romcom shenanigans, more cute than funny, but the last romcom I took in was that not-so-great One Night Only movie, so just being a pleasant smile-inducer was more than welcome.  The one thing that really struck me while watching this is that the concept is a minefield of conflict because when one aspect of the story is wrapping up, another one ignites.  It makes the third act feel very extended as even if the main conflict is resolving, further are still in the air, and it even ends when arguably there are still more to resolve.  It's pretty interesting on how much this film choses to juggle when we all know the ending is just going to be Fearn and Rice doing a big kiss.  There is some commentary on modern-age romance in a social age that is inclined to scrutinize but it's watered down and played for silliness.  That doesn't matter because the romcom audience wants the big kiss.  That's the money.  The movie has big kiss, so it delivers.


Late Fame
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Drama
Director:  Kent Jones
Starring:  Willem Dafoe, Greta Lee, Edmund Donovan


Willem Dafoe plays a former poet living in obscurity in Manhattan who is taken in by a group of young, upper-class writers who push him into writing again.  That sounds like a feel-good story, right?  Then you're reading it wrong.  Ultimately, Late Fame is the comparison of how art and artists is used and mistreated by those who don't value the work but use it to dress themselves.  Dafoe's character is an actual, grounded, lived-in person.  The movie puts him in a room full of people who are performative, acting as if they're supporting and influencing his passion when they are really pressuring him to help them improve their stature and impress others.  Dafoe goes along with it because he never achieved success and had never had this type of attention before.  The film is a realization that he is leaving reality behind for something fake, seduced by the idea of recognition (and also the allure of Greta Lee in a ridiculous wig).  The movie wants to frustrate because it showcases art being made, used, and discussed for the wrong reasons, and it will hopefully prompt a discussion of what art should really mean to the person who makes it and the people who consume it.

Movies Still Playing At My Theater
The End of Oak Street ⭐️⭐️⭐️
The Magic Faraway Tree ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Mutiny ⭐️1/2
The Odyssey ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Spa Weekend ⭐️1/2
Spider-Man:  Brand New Day ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Tony ⭐️⭐️⭐️

New To Digital
Her Private Hell ⭐️1/2
Motor City ⭐️⭐️⭐️

New To Physical
Abraham's Boys ⭐️⭐️1/2
The Breadwinner ⭐️⭐️
Disclosure Day ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Father Mother Sister Brother ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Power Ballad ⭐️⭐️⭐️
She Rides Shotgun ⭐️⭐️⭐️
The Sheep Detectives ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Whistle ⭐️⭐️1/2

Coming Soon!

Monday, August 24, 2026

Cinema Playground Journal 2026: Week 34 (My Cinema Playground)

Multiplex Madness


Insidious:  Out of the Further
⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre:  Horror
Director:  Jacob Chase
Starring:  Amelia Eve, Brandon Perea, Maisie Richardson-Sellers, Lin Shaye


My confession is that I hadn't seen all the Insidious movies until this week.  I tried to grind them when the fifth one came out, but only had time for the first two.  Well, most of the first two.  I didn't finish the second one, but I got ten minutes away from the end and just ran out of time.  I'm pretty sure I could guess how it ended, though.  But this time I was determined to finish the Insidious journey and watched the third and fourth movies, which I did complete.  And yet, I still haven't watched the last ten minutes of the second one.  It's always nagged at me that I never watched this series in full, because I legitimately always thought the first one was pretty good.  Then sequels came out and they just slipped my mind.  My conclusive thoughts on the Insidious series is that it's surprisingly melodramatic, especially when you get to the ones where Lin Shaye is the headliner.  Shaye is a good actress, but the movies always give her big walls of dialogue for her to deliver with theatrical sadness in her eyes.  This is especially true of the fourth movie, which feels like it was written around monologues that they wanted to give her.  The horror elements are usually creative and fun enough to counter, but this franchise is usually a weird mixture of playfulness and a stone face.

But, long story short, I missed out on the Insidious series for all these years.  Turns out I didn't miss much.

Anyway, this sixth film revolves around a dentist who finds that she has a special link to "the Further," that spiritual realm where all the scary spooks live in.  There is also a malevolent force inside it that wishes to use her connection to help all the ghost people escape into the real world and create havoc.  I like this story.  At the heart of it is that theme of paternal bonds that all the Insidious movies have, even if its themes of generational trauma echo the fourth film more than I think it realizes, but it's a solid and sturdy script.  It's pretty definitively the best Insidious movie since the first one.  It has the best balance between the horror story and the personal drama, without falling into the familiar traps of being too convoluted for the former and too overbearing on the latter.  These things especially hurt the last two movies in this series.

The one let down is that the movie isn't as "scary" as the other films in the franchise.  There are scenes of discomfort, and one lengthy scene that has the sole aim of just being gross, but it's not as creative as the other films in this series when it comes to trying to unsettle the audience.  For a good long while, this movie doesn't have a big suspense setpiece that makes you lean forward in anticipation.  In the home stretch, it starts to fuse typical Insidious spookies with Evil Dead insanity, causing one to wonder where this spirit was the whole time.  I'm going to forgive this because I think, as a whole, this movie has more going for it than the other sequels, but the original is still the only film in this series that got the balance right.


The Magic Faraway Tree
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Fantasy
Director:  Ben Gregor
Starring:  Andrew Garfield, Claire Foy, Nonso Anozie, Nicola Coughlan, Jessica Gunning, Jennifer Saunders, Rebecca Ferguson


Based on the classic children's book series, Andrew Garfield and Claire Foy play a pair of unemployed parents who take their family out to the countryside to start a tomato farm.  As their trio of city kids adjust to the simple life, they discover a tree in the woods that leads to a magical lands in the sky.  The Magic Faraway Tree is pure flamboyant British whimsy, with little reason to be purely cinematic cotton candy other than because it can and you're powerless to stop it.  All the set-design is sumptuous and all the costumes look ridiculous, while both are fulfilled by a game cast who are ready to fill the screen with their over-the-top, giggling personas.  The moral of the story is basically escaping the bubble of indoor tech and learning to play outside, which is both simple and obvious.  It delivers it with warmth and cheer, making this a quality option for any family.


Mutiny
⭐️1/2
Genre:  Action
Director:  Jean-François Richet
Starring:  Jason Statham, Annabelle Wallis, Roland Møller, Adrian Lester


Traditionally, a mutiny takes place when a crew strips command away from their ranking officer and takes a station or vessel for their own intent.  That doesn't happen in this movie.  I'm not sure if the people who made it thought a mutiny was just taking over a boat, but it takes balls to make a movie called "Mutiny" that doesn't actually have a mutiny.  What actually does happen in this movie is that Statham is framed for murder, and his search for answers leads to a container ship, where he does Jason Statham things to bad people who are human trafficking.  If one wants to get into the minor details, Annabelle Wallis is a person in the command chain on the ship and she helps Statham, so technically she's committing mutiny, but it's also kind of a paltry mutiny.  Statham's the one doing most of the work.

But we all come to a Jason Statham movie to see Jason Statham bruise some balls.  Can the action in Mutiny save the fact that it's a conceptual mishap?  Mutiny is pretty bottom-tier Statham.  The plot is meandering and clumsy, as Statham just runs around saving people, abandoning them, saving them again, abandoning them again, only to save them fully in the climax.  It's not a thrilling story by any means.  The action is pretty solid when the movie decides to get dirty, and Statham doesn't disappoint.  You get to see him pick up an ax, a crate hook, and harpoon gun, and that's when you know you're about to see some quality violence.  But for a movie with a script this thin, there needs to be more.  This needs to go full Die Hard (or even Under Seige) to make it exciting.  There is not enough event on that boat to film a whole movie around, which makes you wonder why they didn't just actually make a movie about a mutiny.


Spa Weekend
⭐️1/2
Genre:  Comedy
Director:  Jon Lucas, Scott Moore
Starring:  Leslie Mann, Isla Fisher, Michelle Buteau, Anna Faris, Adam Demos


Hoping to attract all the ladies having a girl's night this week is Spa Weekend, a comedy featuring a group of lifelong besties hoping to relax on a weekend that becomes more chaotic as their one friend who doesn't have her shit together shows up.  While I was open to letting this movie just do its thing, ultimately Spa Weekend was a bit of a drag.  Nothing about it has any flow to it, and most of its plot beats feel performative and manufactured, right down to our lead having a love interest whose only personality is to be generic perfect guy.  Even the comedy suffers because of this.  There is a very plastic way all the jokes are delivered in this movie and it stresses me out.  Spa weekends shouldn't raise my blood pressure.  Everyone is doing their best in trying to improve their script by improvising most of their lines, but editing them all together is a janky experience of people saying weird dialogue in a vacuum.  But if I were to give credit to one performer, it would be Isla Fisher.  She storms in with a Peg Bundy wardrobe and plays every scene way larger than she needs to.  Sometimes she overwhelms the movie, but a lot of the scenes she's in kinda need a big presence like hers to kick it in the ass.  There's a scene where she disrupts a group meditation that is pretty fun. It's not laugh-out-loud funny, but it's easily the best scene in the movie.  The movie is painless fluff, but it's not the joyful good time it wants to be.  One scenery-chewing performance can't overturn such a flimsy production.


Teenage Sex and Death at Camp Miasma
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Drama, Horror, Thriller
Director:  Jane Schoenbrun
Starring:  Hannah Einbinder, Gillian Anderson, Jack Haven, Patrick Fischler


I had to play a Where's Waldo? game to find this movie in my area.  My normal theater has been advertising it extensively, but that doesn't always mean they're showing smaller movies like this.  Sometimes they pick them up a week or two later to fill screens, but it also isn't a guarantee.  This might be partially because Spider-Man is still a guaranteed theater filler, but I'd rather blame a bad movie than a good one.  My theater played that stupid Elijah Peel movie last week but they wouldn't put up Camp Miasma.  That's bullshit.

From I Saw the TV Glow director Jane Schoenbrun, Teenage Sex and Death at Camp Miasma is yet another allegorical queer film meshed with meta homage to the type of media they consumed during their formative years.  This one is inspired by 80's slasher movies, mostly the Friday the 13th franchise and a dash of Sleepaway Camp, telling the story of a young director hired to helm a reboot of the fictional Camp Miasma franchise.  Her quest for a new approach to the tired slasher story leads her to the doorstep of the original "final girl" star of the first film, played by Gillian Anderson.  And no, the fact that Anderson is in this film while her series The X-Files was obviously a strong influence on I Saw the TV Glow was not lost on me.

The film is another tour of the psychological effect media has on those who view it during their formative years, and, as the title implies, this one is more specifically focused on sexuality.  And what a better way to express sexuality than what Joe Bob Briggs refers to the "blood, breasts, and beasts" of 80's horror.  A lot of 80's teen sexuality is linked to that culture, from making out in a theater to watching people do it on-screen before they get killed, and bringing it all together as a bizarre sexual awakening.  The killer's name in the Camp Miasma franchise is "Little Death," which is derived from a French nickname for an orgasm.  This is very intentional, becoming a heavy metaphor that drives the third act of the film.

As smart and as interesting as this film can get, it never replicates that crawling-into-your skin energy of I Saw the TV Glow.  But it's also very clearly the same creative force pushing for something equally provocative.  The movie is a very specific expression from a very specific artist, albeit one that has less power behind it than their previous film.  The film is flooded with an LGBTQ identity, and even a good chunk of the film's cast identify as queer in one way or another.  Gillian Anderson is also having the time of her life performing in this movie that drives itself against the grain of the hetero-normative cinema experience, and she spends most of the movie overwhelming it with her character.  Sometimes it struggles infusing that queer identity into its homage of Friday the 13th, as the queer Sleepaway Camp elements don't blend seamlessly with the more popular slasher franchise.  It's doesn't resonate with me as strongly as Schoenbrun's previous film, but it's one that is still worth combing through to see what you can find in it.  And it would probably make an interesting double feature with fellow slasher deconstruction In a Violent Nature, if one were so inclined.

I also felt like lighting a cigarette when it was done with me, so it did something right.


Tony
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Drama
Director:  Matt Johnson
Starring:  Dominic Sessa, Antonio Banderas, Emilia Jones, Dagmara Domińcyk, Rich Sommer, Stavros Halkias, Leo Woodall


Popular chef and Kitchen Confidential author Anthony Bourdain is the subject of this latest biodrama, which sees a young and petulant failed writer named "Tony" following a girl to Massachusetts, only to become stranded there.  With few options, he becomes a dishwasher in a restaurant ran by Antonio Banderas, who eventually allows him to work with the food, igniting his passion for cooking.  The movie feels like a good serving of a story about figuring out what one's purpose in life is, though I feel it's a bit too casual to actually hit.  While we do spend a lot of time with these characters, sometimes it feels like their development happens off-camera.  The movie wants us to read the eyes of the actors more than it wants to tell us what their thinking, which can be virtuous when it when it doesn't stumble upon expressing that adequately.  Still, it's an interesting biopic, and it will be of interest to kitchen-philes.  Bourdain was an interesting guy, though this movie is only just a taste of what made him worth knowing about.

Movies Still Playing At My Theater
The Brink of War ⭐️⭐️
The End of Oak Street ⭐️⭐️⭐️
The Fast and the Furious ⭐️1/2
The Odyssey ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Spider-Man:  Brand New Day ⭐️⭐️⭐️

New To Digital
Toy Story 5 ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2

New To Physical
Backrooms ⭐️⭐️

Coming Soon!

Monday, August 17, 2026

Cinema Playground Journal 2026: Week 33 (My Cinema Playground)

Multiplex Madness


The Brink of War
⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Drama
Director:  Michael Russell Gunn
Starring:  Jeff Daniels, Jared Harris, J.K. Simmons


It had to come to this, didn't it?  I'm still reeling from that fuck-awful Ronald Reagan biopic with Dennis Quaid and now I have another Reagan movie breathing down my neck.  I'm still dealing with trauma, here.  This isn't helping.

This one has a narrowed-down scope, focusing on the meeting between Reagan and Russian leader Mikhail Gorbachev over nuclear disarmament in 1986.  The movie feels like it's only ambition is to be a "movie day" film for history classes in middle school, opting for hammy stage drama instead of anything meaty.  The movie never breaks free of its overwritten dialogue, hamfisted attempts at human relation schmaltz, and uneven casting.  I like Jeff Daniels, but he is very miscast as Reagan.  He is sometimes trying too hard to push that Reagan impression into his own screen persona, and at other times he just gives up, walking in a room like regular Jeff Daniels and is all "I'm Ronald Reagan."  Jared Harris, on the other hand, is excellent casting as Gorbachev.  He takes a script that a lot of actors in this movie are struggling with and he is fully locked-in, ready to sell it.  So half the movie has the heart it needs and half of it feels artificial.  I'm really struggling to compromise with this movie, which is probably fitting, giving the subject matter.

The one thing that makes me softer on its weaker aspects is that the film goes out of its way to actually have some humanization and empathy for the Russians, treating them as real people instead of just the enemy.  Compare this to the Dennis Quaid movie, which portrayed them as blubbering buffoons who were destined to fail because they weren't American.  This aspect of The Brink of War gives the movie a backbone, taking its tricky subject of dramatizing a debate table and giving it a form of dignity that the propaganda of that other movie wouldn't allow.  After all, nobody wants nuclear war, but also nobody wants to give up their nukes.  It was a tricky thing to compromise on and I'll give the movie some credit in understanding that part of the assignment.


Elijah Peel
⭐️
Genre:  Drama, Faith
Director:  Nathan Ross Murphy, Kevin D. Sepe
Starring:  Robert Malcolm Cumming, Evelyn Grace Kite, Kevin Sorbo, April Billingsley, Princess Elmore


The poster for Elijah Peel says it's inspired by a true story but, for the life of me, I can't find any information on what that true story is.  As far as I know, Elijah Peel is not a real person.  Google's AI says the movie is just a loose translation of co-director Kevin D. Sepe's born again experience, but it will be a cold day in hell when I trust an AI summary at face value.  But if that is true, I'd say that is some heavy duty bullshit advertising, up there with claiming Texas Chainsaw Massacre is inspired by a true story because, technically, serial killers exist and they might live in Texas and own a chainsaw.

So, this fake true story is about a hard drinking, hard partying rock star name Elijah Peel who has a heart attack and finds himself in ICU, visited by a young girl with cancer who wants him to know that Jesus loves him.  They become friends and this convinces him to become a Christian rock artist.  If you think any of this happens gradually, you'd be wrong.  The movie does nothing with subtlety.  There is melodrama and then there is whatever this movie is doing, where it portrays dramatic beats by hitting sudden mood swings, dropping to its knees and bursting into shrill wails.  Even Al Jolson would tell it to calm the fuck down.  The drug scenes are so brazenly in-your-face that it almost feels like a stern warning by people who have never done drugs in their lives and it becomes a movie about conquering drug addiction that feels like it was made by someone whose experience with it was limited to watching Reefer Madness and thinking it was a biting commentary.  After all of this, our title character spends thirty seconds with the little girl and becomes completely obsessed with her, going through a Patch Adams phase where he just clowns around the hospital with her.  Then the movie hits lows where everyone is on the floor and crying because of "the power of music" or something.  This somehow forces him into a relapse, where instead of being given drugs, some dude just locks him in a room with a girl who is OD'ing.  Even after-school specials  would think it's too much.

This isn't even mentioning the various things in this movie that are odd.  The movie's portrayal of nurses is strange, because some will wear proper scrubs and others will dress in uniforms that feel like they were rented from porno sets, with short skirts and cleavage bearing, to show "temptation."  The movie has a long (humorous?) montage of him rejecting personal nurses because they're all too sexy.  Then there is a scene where a nurse threatens to give him strychnine instead of morphine after he won't stop flirting with her, which I'm pretty sure could get her fired even if she was being sexual harassed.  Then comes a late revelation that the movie is pro-stem cell research, which is usually the exact opposite of what a faith film would normally do because that also implies that it's pro-abortion by association.  But then again, maybe the filmmakers just don't know what stem cells are.  They aren't rocket scientists, they just want to make a movie about a magical sick girl who knows everything about life.

This leads to an ending that is very strange and I can't tell if it's trying to be ambiguous or not because it's shooting too many conflicting ideas at the audience.  I'm just going to spoil the fuck out of it because I'm the only person who will ever watch this movie, so you've been warned.  This being a movie about a cancer patient, the movie obviously is going to get to that point where cancer is going to do what it does.  But then it presents the that experimental stem cell treatment and then it flashes forward to our titular musician singing a song because he promised the girl he'd "sing at her funeral," then it cuts to the audience and she's just sitting out there.  Maybe the intent is that we're supposed to decide whether she lived or died by ourselves but there are so many aspects to this movie that are underdeveloped that this ending just comes off as the movie just being done with itself.  To be frank, it's hard to hate a movie that presents a trite story as stupidly as this one does.  I just don't have the energy.  But nobody who worked on this film had any ideas of how to pull off something that has been done a thousand times, and that's just mind-numbing.


The End of Oak Street
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Science Fiction, Adventure, Thriller
Director:  David Robert Mitchell
Starring:  Anne Hathaway, Ewan McGregor, Maisy Stella, Christian Convery


Oh, that's cute.  Someone remade The Day Time Ended.

An entire neighborhood goes on an "Excellent Adventure" as it's hurdled through time, transplanting both it and its residents in the prehistoric past, where they fend off dinosaurs and other dangers.  The movie is very Speilberg-coded, centering on a singular family trying to navigate the carnage as everyone dies around them.  In that aspect, it actually reminded me of Spielberg's version of War of the Worlds the most, even though it's a more majestic-minded film, wanting to be a cross between E.T. and Jurassic Park.  Speaking of the latter, The End of Oak Street is actually quite a bit better than that franchise has been of late, being preferable than...honestly, about all of the sequels, maybe?  If anything holds the film back, it's that the scenario it creates is so chaotic that some of the plot set-up in the film is cut shor and never paid off.  Focusing on a single P.O.V. then giving glimpses of others surrounding them who are having their own experience that we know near nothing about makes the story feel like Swiss cheese, which is technically whole but full of empty space that offers nothing.  And it leads to an ending that is presented as sweet but is honestly very problematic if you think about it, but I can't rant about that unless I laid the entire thing out and explained what was wrong with the entire idea.  But the movie mostly works on a solid foundation of weird adventure candy cinema that can be fun one moment and savage the next.  It's more worthwhile of the price for your ticket than all of the Jurassic World movies, so that's something.


Nimrods
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Comedy
Director:  Lee Kirk
Starring:  Mason Thames, Kylr Coffman, Ryan Faust, Mckenna Grace, Jenna Fischer


Nimrods is one of those self-promotional movies that popular bands make about fans having misadventures on their way to a concert.  Today's group of the day is Green Day.  The film follows a teen band that has been pranked into thinking they're opening for Green Day for a big New Year's concert across the country, so they steal a car and go on a road trip to make the non-existent date.  From my understanding, the film is partially inspired by Green Day's early experiences before breaking out, with some loose inspiration also from another band called Waterdog that opened for them in the 90's.  As to what is true and what is bullshit, I'm not familiar enough with "Green Day lore" to tell you, but the fact that Green Day made the movie semi-autobiographical makes this movie feel slightly more personal than other films of its ilk.  There is heart and care put into it, and the film can be really funny at times.  It can also digress into oddity, notably in a section that is a horror movie parody halfway through that is more strange than humorous.  The film has these small blemishes that feel odd in the moment but don't take away from the experience, like Mckenna Grace's character serving zero purpose other than to have a love interest for five minutes, but she's a pleasure to have in any movie, so it doesn't really matter.  It's a series of comical scenarios that are mostly successful at creating smiles, while also ending on an emotional beat that I'm not fully convinced the movie was properly building to, but still kinda hits.  The movie works in spite of itself, resulting in an uneven joy.


Paw Patrol:  The Dino Movie
⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre:  Adventure, Fantasy, Superhero
Director:  Cal Brunker
Starring:  Carter Young, Ryan Janjua, Mckenna Grace, Hayden Chamberlain, Henry Bolan, Lucien Duncan-Reid, William Desrosiers, Nylan Parthipan, Terry Crews, Jameela Jamil, Paris Hilton, Snoop Dogg


This is both the second movie this week with Mckeena Grace, as well as the second movie with dinosaurs.  I don't know if that means anything, but this one has talking dogs, so...win?

The Nickelodeon sensation is back on the big screen for the third time, this time seeing the rescue pups discovering a lost island full of dinosaurs.  Because kids love Paw Patrol and kids love dinosaurs, but not every kid is old enough to see The End of Oak Street, so we'll take them to see the one where even the carnivorous dinosaurs make friends with puppy dogs.  I'm assuming these Paw Patrol movies are made to center around one specific dog from the team with each movie, offering an origin story and a specific character flaw to overcome.  The last movie focused on Skye, the flying pink one, and, while I haven't seen it, I'm assuming the first movie featured Chase, who is the blue police dog.  For The Dino Movie, the pup of the hour is Marshall, who is the one with the red firehat.  Marshall is portrayed as very clumsy and accident prone, having a hard time to work past his mistakes.  I'm not sure if those aspects are actually a thing in the TV show, but if they were, I've never noticed while babysitting and playing on my phone.  But the message of the movie is failure is what we need to learn how to succeed, which is why we never give up, and that's nice.

The one small thing that was nagging me about this movie is that the Paw Patrol are a rescue squad.  It's kind of the one thing that they do.  So when the premise of your movie is that they find a lost dinosaur land, the film needs to convolute ways of getting them to do that one thing and not just stand around an island while playing with dinosaurs.  Ultimately, the dinosaurs are just an aesthetic choice, providing a backdrop where they maybe will sell a few toys in addition to the shiny new Paw Patrol vehicles and outfits (they wear pants now!) and the all-new team member Rex, who rides a T-Rex ala Dino-Riders, and Marshall's new dino friend Rubarb.  It feels like the movie can be blatantly toyetic in that regard, but Paw Patrol has always been a high merch seller, and the last movie had them as superheroes, so I can't blame the movie for being what it is.

The real test case for these movies is the audience they were made for.  The six-year-old I took to see it thought it was the best movie ever.  He got a lunchbox full of popcorn, a little cup with Marshall on it, and a Paw Patrol poster and pin-on button.  He's living his best life.  Paw Patrol:  The Dino Movie gave him a good day.  Thank you, Paw Patrol.  You saved the day again.


The Rivals of Amziah King
⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Drama, Comedy, Thriller
Director:  Andrew Patterson
Starring:  Matthew McConaughey, Angelina LookingGlass, Scott Shepherd, Rob Morgan, Tony Revolori, Kurt Russell


Matthew McConaughey plays a beekeeper who reconnects with a foster child he used to care for, played by Angelina LookingGlass.  After his bees are stolen, McConaughey dies of a heart attack, leaving LookingGlass as an heir to a bee colony that has no bees.  LookingGlass then seeks out those who might have taken his bees and tries to get them back by any means necessary.  To be frank, I'm kinda disappointed in myself for not liking this movie.  The movie started out as a vibe, and I was enjoying it.  Then the vibe shifts.  Then it shifts again.  And again.  The type of movie this was kept changing.  By the end, I was very disengaged.  Maybe it's my fault.  Maybe it's the movie.  I'm not quite sure.  This movie almost feels like it was two movies that were spliced together in an editing room and presented to its audience as if they mixed peanut butter and chocolate together and made something delicious, but the taste is so bitter that I can't appreciate it.  The movie starts out as a happy little movie about family.  Then it becomes sad.  Then it becomes angry.  It seems to me, to the best of my media literacy, that the movie is trying to be a folk tale that is mixed with the presentation of a mafia movie.  The movie becomes a story of "they who control the bees controls the honey," which is an interesting prospect.  I don't think it forgives the many tonal shifts of the film, as we venture down some dark paths that are glossed over too quickly in favor of shifting the tone for the next scene.  At no point during this movie did I feel like I understood what the movie was.  I was okay with that for a little while.  Movies that try for unique experiences should be encouraged.  By the end, the experience I was having felt like enduring instead of experiencing.  That's of no fault of the creatives or the actors, because this movie feels like exactly the movie they wanted to make.  The honey just didn't taste very sweet.


The Wrong Girls
⭐️1/2
Genre:  Comedy
Director:  Dylan Meyer
Starring:  Kristen Stewart (line?), Alia Shawkat, LaKeith Stanfield, Tony Hale, Zack Fox, Seth Rogen, Kumail Nanjiani, Kate McKinnon, Geena Davis


This oddball comedy is a professional collaboration between Kristen Stewart and her wife, Dylan Meyer, who wrote and directed the movie.  The movie follows Stewart, who is confused with a woman who looks exactly like her at a nightclub, and is passed off a suitcase full of an unknown substance while she is too drunk to realize what's happening.  She then drinks it with her roommate/bestie Alia Shawkat, and the two become telepathically linked.  They then venture off to sell it for rent money, oblivious to the fact that they might now be the most powerful people on the planet.  If that sounds dumb, that's because it is dumb.  I'm pretty sure the movie's only goal is to be dumb.  The Wrong Girls plays like it was made by someone who really loved The Big Lebowski and Dude, Where's My Car? and decided to mash them together for the ultimate dummy stoner comedy.  Maybe they're a tad aggressive on it, as its aesthetic is overbearing and sometimes hard to pay attention to because of how much they're throwing on the screen.  And, as stated above, the movie is really stupid.  That's not a bad thing if it's funny enough.  There are laughs to be had, but as the movie indulges itself in getting weirder and weirder, it seems like it has gotten high on itself and is stuck in a loop of giggling at a joke that it never says out loud.

But I'm pretty sure that's part of its vibe, willing to be its awkward self because it's better than being like everyone else.  I respect that.  Despite the fact that the movie didn't really vibe with me, it does have this tone to it like it's one of those dumb movies they'd play on the 2000's era USA network over and over again until it accumulated a proper cult following from teenagers who would just lie on the couch with a bag of Doritos handy.  Maybe the same fate will be bestowed on The Wrong Girls, because it's nothing if it's not a midnight movie targeted at a very specific demographic.  After all, any movie that casually drops a Sliders reference can't be all bad.

Movies Still Playing At My Theater
Ice Cream Man ⭐️1/2
Minions & Monsters ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Moana ⭐️1/2
The Odyssey ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
One Night Only ⭐️⭐️
Spider-Man:  Brand New Day ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Toy Story 5 ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Train to Busan ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

New To Digital
The Invite ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Jackass:  Best and Last ⭐️⭐️1/2
Minions & Monsters ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Young Washington ⭐️⭐️

New To Physical
Barbarian ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Dolly ⭐️⭐️⭐️
The Furious⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Hokum ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Project Hail Mary ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Tuner ⭐️⭐️⭐️

Coming Soon!

Thursday, August 13, 2026

K03-Star Force: Fugitive Alien II (FOUND EPISODE!!!)


Film Year:  1987 (compiled from a 1978 TV series)
Genre:  Science Fiction, Adventure
Director:  Kiyosumi Kukazawa, Minoru Kanaya
Starring:  Jou Shishido, Tatsuya Azuma, Miyuki Tanigawa, Choei Takahashi, Tsutomu Yukawa, Hiro Tateyama
MST Season:  KTMA

The Movie

Because who gives a shit about proper story context, Mystery Science Theater offers up the sequel before they touched the original.  But getting up to speed, when we last saw the crew of the Bacchus 3, they had adopted the former alien warrior Star Wolf known as Ken into their crew (with only Captain Joe knowing of his past).  Now they must survive an exploding star, then destroy a diabolical weapon, and face down the leader of the Star Wolves.


There's not a lot to say about Star Force that you can't say about the first Fugitive Alien.  If you want my two cents about the series in general, one might find it in those reviews.  What can I say about Star Force that I can't about the first?  It's a bit more inane (which is saying something).  The first three quarters of the film have a reasonable plot thread that connects them before it compiles the conclusive episode of the series in an out of nowhere final act.  Given that this film isn't really the way the Star Wolf series is intended to be seen, I can be somewhat forgiving of it, however.

I love these Japanese effects shows, and I'd hate to disappoint anybody who clicks these reviews expecting me to tear them a new one.  I don't have that anger within me.  They're fun escapism, and I give this Fugitive Alien saga a pass.


The Episode

It started like any other day.  I woke up in the afternoon, because I work nights, and planned on taking my mother to see Project Hail Mary because it stars her secret husband Ryan Gosling (I'm not one to judge, because I've similarly imprinted on the AT&T Girl, who was also in Project Hail Mary).  I logged in to see if there was any new Mystery Science Theater 3000 news that I slept through, seeing how we had just funded the new RiffTrax Experiments episodes.  First thing I see was "K03 found at garage sale."  I smirked and thought, "Nice try, April Fools Day," completely forgetting that it was March 20th.  Eventually, I clicked the link just to amuse myself, greeted with a video that was undoubtedly a RickRoll.  I looked at the time on it, it said one hour and forty-two minutes.  Okay, so they looped "Never Gonna Give You Up" over the span of a hundred minutes.  I started skimming the video.  It most definitely was a Fugitive Alien movie, and it most definitely was a KTMA era MST3K episode, but its quality was way better than any copy of K12 I've ever seen.  Was it a cleaned up copy of K12?  No, this footage is from Star Force.  Did that mean...?

...

Oh my god.

Holy SHIT!

This actually was K03.  The lost episode of Mystery Science Theater 3000 had been found, and there I was sitting in my underpants trying not to look like I was dead.

I flashed back to the day where I witnessed the lost host segment of Superdome found on the MST3K message boards.  Years pass, and the Cinematic Titanic crew shares the pilot film of The Green Slime publicly.  A few more years go by and Joel shared official copies of Invaders from the Deep and Revenge of the Mysterons from Mars as a reward for the 2015 Kickstarter.  A decade after that, having thought this episode was lost to time, we found the final lost MST3K episode.  Our beloved series is finally complete.  Suck it, Doctor Who.  We win.

It's been such a long road.


That doesn't mean we're done.  There is still media worth trying to find.  The unused CD-ROM short Mylar:  What's It To You? is probably the new Holy Grail.  There are also live shows from MST3K and Cinematic Titanic that are unlikely to surface, but never say never.  Weirder things have happened, and with this amazing find, there is definitely optimism in the air.

And with all the positivity going around, since this is the last slice of the classic series a lot of us die-hards will ever consume, that obviously means that this will be the greatest episode of the entire series!  Otherwise it will be a bitter disappointment.

Let's cool our jets and re-center ourselves.  Reminder:  this is a KTMA episode.  And it's an early KTMA episode.  There is a ceiling on how good this episode is going to be.  The entire reason this episode is important has more to do as a historical artifact.  Indiana Jones voice:  "That belongs in a museum!" and so on and so forth.  This is the last visual piece of the show's evolution that we didn't have.  That doesn't mean it's going to be much as an episode by itself.  Most KTMA episodes weren't, and this one doesn't even have the benefit of featuring a movie that we haven't seen in the show's format outside of this episode, which arguably makes it less important than the two episodes before it that were also missing for decades.  Arguably, the only actual point of interest in this episode is Servo's trasition between the drawl he used in Revenge of the Mysterons from Mars and the high squeal he sported in Gamera vs. Barugon.  And indeed, that transition happens in this episode.  Is it addressed?  Nope.  He's just speaking in a different voice than last week and they never acknowledge it.  Okay, cool.  That's all I wanted to know.  Also, this was the episode that one guy watched.  You know, the one who called and complained about and had his message played on the air during Gamera vs. Barugon.  Good to finally see what pissed him off.

Other than that, the highlight of the episode is the movie featured.  I love Fugitive Alien.  I love Star Force.  I'm going to have fun with this episode simply because I care for this weird brand.  I don't know why they riffed the second one first, though I assume that in the early days of KTMA, they just pulled tapes, looked at the titles, and chose what sounded funny.  Also, Joel just introduces this movie as "Star Force," which leads me to believe that was all the network's tape was labeled as, so it's possible that they just didn't know it was a sequel.  If they're lost in what this movie is doing, they don't point it out.  The dense lore of Fugitive Alien doesn't seem to bother them too much, though Crow does get more confused as it goes due to the sudden story arc change in the climax.

For the longest time, the only surviving riff from this episode was a small clip where Servo said "They must have spent tens of dollars on this."  It's a pretty good joke.  Presumably, this was the best joke of the episode, and yeah, it kinda was.  One thing I noted was that the group has trouble getting out of the gate.  Servo is the first to riff, and he's also the last one in the theater, as he just pops up about a minute after Joel and Crow enter.  Servo makes a joke.  Then he makes another.  And another.  And another.  There is like good long stretch of this, as if Josh is trying to push some momentum into the comedy.  Once the ball gets rolling, they all start quipping when they can.  Being early KTMA, the episode can feel very empty, but a few good lines hit.  I liked Servo commenting on Tammy's eyewear during her sickness early in the movie:  "I always find it easier to sleep with a Viewmaster on my face."  Crow has a good joke about the score of the movie, as the Bacchus crew is stuck in a sandstorm and the music swells with vocals as the wind picks up, prompting him to say "It's not the wind; it's a men's choir!"  There is also an early example of a reactionary riff, where a spaceship flies toward the camera and they try to dodge it.  Trace practically tosses the Crow puppet straight off camera.

"Danger, Will Robinson!"
"That's a robot joke."
"Well, it's kind of an inside thing."


Most of what we had seen before of this episode were a handful of host segments (I took a look at surviving footage of the episode here).  We've seen the intro, where Joel shows off a few prop inventions in what is an early prototype of the Invention Exchange, which featured "Nunclucks,", the "Pointing Gun," and the "Chiro Helmet" (which was borrowed from the Green Slime pilot and also reused in season one).  Other host segments that we had access to were included Crow explaining Thanksgiving to Gypsy/Gypsum (poorly) and another had Joel explaining drugs to Gypsy/Gypsum, which is just an excuse for Joel to use his psychedelic glasses.  As for the two host segments we hadn't seen, they're nothing really special.  They must have had drugs on the brain (not like that), because another also deals with drugs, only this time as a parable because Crow and Servo are "using" hairpins and Joel scolds them for it like a disapproving father.  I don't get it.  The other new segment has Crow and Servo in false beards because they misread "breaking bread" as "breaking beard."  Okay, sure.  The one thing I find interesting about the host segments is that they are Thanksgiving focused, even though Thanksgiving was already over.  Hell, the show debuted with two episodes on the actual holiday.  Part of me thinks they just didn't know when they were going to debut and just assumed this would air the same weekend as Thanksgiving, which technically was true.  The first two episodes came out on Thanksgiving Thursday and this one aired the following Sunday.  I think, in their mind, this was supposed to be the Thanksgiving special and scheduling screwed up.  But it doesn't really matter anymore.

If one were to put aside the importance of what this episode represents and ask my opinion of it in a vacuum, I'd simply say that I think the riff itself is probably the weakest of the first three episodes but the movie is the most ridiculously entertaining one they've shown yet.  These two aspects kinda balance each other in a weird way, making the episode fun in spite of it being a weak example of what this show is and what it can be.  I might even still say that this one of the weakest episodes of the season in the face of that.  As stated above, I have a personal fondness for Fugitive Alien, which does a lot of heavy lifting for me.  In light of that, that means I can't actually recommend this one because its strengths are perfectly suited to me not not many others.  If one is of a likened mindset, then yes, watch this one.  Or even if you're just curious.  But I can also say that of any episode of Mystery Science Theater 3000.  That type of recommendation isn't that enticing, because it basically amounts to "If you're going to watch it, then watch it."

But, if nothing else, I need to say this.  I've been a fan of this show since 1997.  During that particular period of my life, I was obsessed with the Sci-Fi era of the show because those were the only episodes I had access to.  After the show was canceled, a lot of my life was devoted to discovery, working my way backwards through what episodes I could get my hands on (mind you, this was long before every episode was easy access on YouTube and Internet Archive).  I spent a good portion of my twenties piecing together this show like a puzzle with the knowledge that there will always be pieces missing.  As of 2026, I can say I've seen the entirety of Mystery Science Theater 3000.  After the better part of three decades, I don't know if I can wrap my head around the fact that I now have every single episode at my disposal and can watch them at leisure.  That feeling is...really weird, to be honest.  And I don't think it hit me as to what was bothering me until a random memory popped into my head.

Way back in the day, I was really big on the show Sliders.  I once met a guy online who had a copy of every episode but there was one he refused to watch.  It wasn't because of the content of the episode, and it wasn't even the finale or anything important.  It was just some random episode that he never got around to and said that he probably wouldn't watch it anytime soon.  When asked why, he responded that as soon as he watches that episode, that means the show is over and there will be no more to look forward to.  I always thought that was strange, because my reasoning was that if you've not going to watch it, then you can't really look forward to it.  I don't think I've related to his mindset more than I did the minute I finished this episode.  It's like a strange feeling of satisfaction and the emptiness of "Wow, I guess that's it.  It's over.  I'm done."  The world could have easily never had seen this episode again, and I would have gone to my grave saying "Mystery Science Theater 3000 is never over, because there is one episode left."  Now that just isn't true anymore.  I don't know if I'm ever going to be able to look at this episode normally because I'll always associate it with that.  The only thing left is the uncertainty of whatever gets made in the future, be it the RiffTrax Experiments, Season Fourteen, or otherwise.  Until those days come, Mystery Science Theater 3000 is over.  That's bittersweet.  But it is also complete.  I'm happy about that.

⭐️⭐️
Average