Monday, December 15, 2025

Cinema Playground Journal 2025: Week 50 (My Cinema Playground)

Multiplex Madness


Dust Bunny
⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre:  Fantasy, Action, Thriller, Comedy
Director:  Brad Fuller
Starring:  Mads Mikkelsen, Sophie Sloan, Sigourney Weaver, Sheila Atim, David Dastmalchian


An R-rated children's fantasy at first sounds like something that's made for no one.  Then one remembers how Guillermo del Toro made everyone shut their goddamn mouths with Pan's Labyrinth, so let's just roll with the punches.  In this whimsical fairy, a little girl is afraid of the monster under her bed, which escalates when the monster eats her parents, so that's how you know things have gotten serious.  To kill a monster, one must hire someone who kills monsters.  Luckily her next door neighbor does just such a thing.  Only he's a hitman who kills human "monsters," and he humors her story in believing that the monster under her bed is actually an assassin out to find him.  Wildly inventive and endearingly funny, Dust Bunny is an absolutely unforgettable collision of action movie thrills and the darkest depths of a child's imagination.  It stands proudly in the wake of dark fantasy tales that defined early Tim Burton's filmography that has gotten more mundane over the years.  Dust Bunny rediscovers that mojo and devours it whole, like the next logical evolution in fantasy movie chaos from 80's flicks like Beetlejuice and Gremlins.  The movie has spunk and a relentless pace, only to lag in interest when it plays the "Oh no, there's actually a real monster here" card a few too many times, especially in the third act.  One longs for characters to get wise and have a more substantial climax with the creature than they actually do, but it's not enough to fully hamper the fun.  Dust Bunny is destined to start out as a movie barely anyone knows about, only to grow its audience slowly like an infection.  One day it will accumulate enough love to be a cult classic but hopefully it moves past that to become a genuine classic.


Ella McCay
⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Comedy, Drama
Director:  James L. Brooks
Starring:  Emma Mackey, Jamie Lee Curtis, Jack Lowden, Kumail Nanjiani, Spike Fearn, Woody Harrelson, Albert Brooks, Julie Kavner, Rebecca Hall, Ayo Edebiri


Most kids of my generation are likely to associate James L. Brooks with being one of the names you see in the producer credits on The Simpsons.  Brooks never really had much creative input on the show, he was just very instrumental in getting it on the air.  Brooks has his own shit to do, which includes his own film directing career that dates back to Best Picture Oscar winner Terms of Endearment, and other award season darlings like Broadcast News and As Good as It Gets.  He hasn't directed a movie in a while but one hopes that when he does, it's going to be something special.  Ella McCay isn't, though those who miss quaint comedies like it probably won't have a bad time watching it.  Those who want this type of movie to be more enchanting might have a harder time swallowing it.


The film features Emma Mackey as Ella McCay, a Lieutenant Governer who suddenly finds herself promoted to the big job when Governer Albert Brooks gets a Cabinet position in Washington D.C.  In the aftermath, she juggles both scandal and personal family problems, and sometimes the two are intertwined.  It's an okay concept that is probably too mundane in delivery to truly hit.  Unfortunately, hyperbole has crashed into this movie from many of the critical reactions and is blowing its flaws out of preportion.  Calling Ella McCay one of the worst movies of the year is either woefully naive or blissfully ignorant (a statement made by people who obviously didn't suffer through Juliet & Romeo).  It's certainly not a great movie, but its flaws usually default to slow comedic timing and the plastic, hallow reality it seems to be dwelling in.  However, if I were to dwell in the positive kiddie side of the swimming pool with little floaties around my arms, while the movie's punchlines are often misdelivered, a lot of them are genuinely amusing.  The movie's heart is aimless and clueless, but it also clearly has a heart in general, which isn't true for several movies I can name this year (I'm looking at you, How to Train Your Dragon).  The movie has an interesting moral message about knowing your value, the hurt of being wronged, and the acceptance of apologies, not because the other person needs it, but because you need it.  These are all strong ideas.  They're shuffled into a light mess of a dramedy, but they're present and hit to varying degrees.  I wouldn't say this is a bad script, it's just written with stilted theatricality and filmed and performed as if it's quirky and off-the-cuff, which feels like an oxymoron.  With some tweaks, Ella McCay would probably make a better overacted play or fluff novel than a movie.  Do I recommend Ella McCay as is?  Probably not.  It's also not a good career capper for Brooks, if that was what he was hoping to gain from this.  But who knows.  Maybe he has another one in the tank.



Not Without Hope
⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre:  Drama, Thriller
Director:  Joe Carnahan
Starring:  Zachary Levi, Quentin Plair, Terrence Terrell, Marshall Cook, JoBeth Williams, Floriana Lima, Josh Duhamel


Somewhere in the last year or two, Zachary Levi decided he's not a comedian anymore and is trying to reinvent himself as an inspirational leading man.  It was probably the one-two punch of Shazam 2 and that Harold and the Purple Crayon movie both tanking at the box office and defining him as being somewhat box office poison, and maybe Levi sees his career sinking and is throwing himself into the faith market and pitching himself as their next rising star.  It worked for Kevin Sorbo, I guess.  Kind of.  God help anyone who stars in the movies Kevin Sorbo stars in these days.  I wouldn't wish that on my worst enemy, who might actually have a lot in common with Sorbo, now that I think of it.  Zachary Levi might be best off with a career shift as a bartender if he's on that trajectory.

Based on a true story, Levi and a group of friends find themselves on a capsized boat far off the coast with crashing waves carrying them further out to sea.  The group struggles to stay alive while the Coast Guard relentlessly searches for them.  Of all of Levi's half-assed inspirational dramas this year, Not Without Hope is the least cringe, as he doesn't magically cure depression with his imaginary friend nor is he a white savior in a minority's story.  Even clearing that low bar, it's actually pretty okay.  The movie is somewhat excitingly filmed by Joe Carnahan, who has some experience with the survival genre following The Grey.  The drama and dialogue scenes are less memorable and more lifeless than you would hope from a movie like this, but they also don't induce scoffing or mockery, which is a minor win for the movie seeing how that could be an easy trap for it.  The movie is ultimately watchable but unimpressive and forgettable.  Not Without Hope does absolutely nothing that similar movies haven't already done better, but it's targeting an audience that wants more of these, and it adequately provides them with more.  Its only damning flaw is that it's hard to genuinely feel passionate about it, no matter how passionate it feels about itself.


Silent Night, Deadly Night
⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre:  Horror, Comedy
Director:  Mike P. Nelson (NO, NOT THAT MIKE NELSON)
Starring:  Rohan Campbell, Ruby Modine, David Lawrence Brown, David Tomlinson, Mark Acheson


The seventh film in the Silent Night, Deadly Night slasher film series is also the second reboot of it, following the sixth film, 2012's Silent Night.  That film was more a loose reimagining rather than a full remake, however.  Those wanting something that actually updates the original film are better served here.  This film stars Halloween Ends star Rohan Campbell, who finds himself in yet another situation where the will to be a mass murderer spreads to him like some sort of weird contagion.  After witnessing his parents slaughtered at a young age, Campbell grows up to be a killer himself every December, when he murders one "naughty" person every night leading up until Christmas, like a macabre Advent Callender.  The idea behind Silent Night, Deadly Night is actually a really fun spin on the slasher genre and probably deserved more popularity with horror fans than it got, embracing the anti-hero masked killer idea more warmly than other franchises, which always treated ins popular personalities as full antagonists to be overcame.  The good news about this movie is that its fully embraced being a rock opera of mayhem that we root for, providing a likable protagonist with warm personal relationships that make us want him to come home safe to.  That being said, it can be sloppy in its presentation.  It weilds it's carnage as a metaphor for traumatic rage but it's also not really effectively raging against anything.  The movie is playful, but careless.  Our anti-hero slasher is kind of incompetent and he's just lucky the world that he wants to see bleed is more incompetent than he is.  I think this movie has convinced itself this is just flinging carnage in all directions and didn't notice.  Silent Night, Deadly Night is a fun option for horror fans who want to skip the heartwarming family films of the holidays and put on a Christmas themes macabre offering.  Convincing them that they should watch this instead of Terrifier 3 every year, on the other hand, that might take some work.

Netflix & Chill


Influencers
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Streaming On:  Shudder
Genre:  Thriller
Director:  Kurtis David Harder
Starring:  Cassandra Naud, Emily Tennant, Georgina Campbell, Jonathan Whitesell, Lisa Delamar


Cassandra Naud is back as social media stalker C.W. in this sequel to one of the best movies on Shudder.  Having escaped the island she was trapped on at the end of the first film, C.W. is now living happily in France with her girlfriend, who knows nothing of her bloody past.  But Madison, the sole survivor of the previous movie, hunts C.W. down to prove that her story is true.  Probably one of my most hotly anticipated streaming films of the year, up there with Frankenstein and Wake Up Dead Man, I wasn't sure where a sequel to a movie as contained as Influencer was going to go but I was eager to find out.  Catching up with Naud's psychotic socialite was a treat, even if the transition between the two films feels lightly uneven.  The movie never bothers to explain how she escaped the island, though it does address that it's seemingly absurd that she did so before changing the subject entirely, framing it as unimportant.  I respect the effort it took to not answer this question so blatantly, so I'll give it a pass.  The mind games on display aren't as savage and engrossing as the previous film, but that's mostly because we're already savvy to what's going on in Naud's head this time around.  There are a few twists and turns, some are too extravagant for the film's own good, but Naud still owns the production like a queen.  Her castmates always find their own screen presence murdered by her "it factor."  This is especially true of her male target throughout most of the movie, whose toxic dudebro persona gets very tiresome very fast.  This is part of the film's overall plot because we're not supposed to sympathize with him and feel he deserves some sort of comeuppance, but it's just a lot of time spent with someone who needs to be punched.  I can't recommend the film over the original but it's a fun continuation for those who want to see what happens next.

Movies Still Playing At My Theater
100 Nights of Hero ⭐️⭐️
Eternity ⭐️⭐️1/2
Fackham Hall ⭐️⭐️1/2
Hamnet ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Nuremberg ⭐️⭐️⭐️
One Battle After Another ⭐️⭐️1/2
Predator:  Badlands ⭐️⭐️⭐️
The Running Man ⭐️⭐️1/2
Sarah's Oil ⭐️⭐️
Wicked:  For Good ⭐️⭐️1/2
Zootopia 2 ⭐️⭐️⭐️

New To Digital
The Carpenter's Son ⭐️⭐️1/2
Christy ⭐️⭐️1/2
Die My Love ⭐️⭐️
Dogma ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Keeper ⭐️⭐️

New To Physicsl
Dead of Winter ⭐️⭐️⭐️
I'm Still Here ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2

Coming Soon!

Monday, December 8, 2025

Cinema Playground Journal 2025: Week 49 (My Cinema Playground)

Multiplex Madness


100 Nights of Hero
⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Comedy, Drama, Fantasy
Director:  Julia Jackman
Starring:  Emma Corrin, Nicholas Galitzine, Maika Monroe, Amir El-Masry, Charlie XCX, Richard E. Grant, Felicity Jones


Strange little artsy metaphor movie about girl power takes place in some sort of fantasy world with three moons, where Maika Monroe is in hot water with her patriarchal in-laws for not producing an heir for her husband, who refuses to have sex with her.  Why doesn't he have sex with her?  The movie can't be bothered to answer that.  I was under the idea that it might be repressed homosexuality but the movie never even addresses it.  He just doesn't.  That's kinda of a weird plot point to jump off of but we just have to run with it.  Maybe he just watched It Follows and doesn't want Monroe's monster cooties.  Yeah, let's go with that.  Anyway, she is given a hundred days to get pregnant and, instead of doing it and/or her himself, her husband just up and leaves her with his handsome friend.  Does he want the friend to get her pregnant for him?  Doesn't seem like it.  In fact, the husband holds no interest in getting her pregnant at all and they both make a bet that she won't sleep with the friend after a hundred days and if she does, they'll have her executed.

What even is this story?

It turns out the actual story the movie wants to tell has very little to do with the main storyline.  The movie is thematically about oppressed women who want their voices to be heard, mostly taking the form of Emma Corrin's servant girl character, who tells stories of the women who wish to also tell stories and are punished for it.  What does any of this have to do with the pregnancy plotline?  Nothing, really.  It's an overcomplicated and underdeveloped metaphor about a group of men keeping Monroe subservient to them.  And that's what makes this movie so frustrating to watch, because it functions as an ode to the power of the storyteller but betrays its own message because its own story is barren and incomplete.  That feels very unforgivable, which is a shame, because the movie otherwise feels like it was made with vision.  The movie is a quirky little slice of idiosyncrasy.  It's like if Edgar Wright and Wes Anderson collaborated to make a Yorgos Lanthamos homage.  It's narrative is just jerky and rapid fire to the point that it feels like aimless jabbering rather than anything meaningful.  It does have a good message at its center, though.  Those who resonate with it could very well be more forgiving of this movie's flaws.  It's a well-intended mess.


Fackham Hall
⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre:  Comedy, Mystery
Director:  Jim O'Hanlon
Starring:  Katherine Waterston, Thomasin McKenzie, Tom Felton, Emma Laird, Tom Goodman-Hill, Anna Maxwell Martin, Sue Johnston, Damian Lewis


Hot off the heels of the Naked Gun reboot is a brand new spoof film, this time taking aim at historical British aristocracy dramas and murder mysteries.  Thomasin McKenzie plays a rich entitled girl who is lined up to marry a cousin, like the rest of her family, but falls in love with newly hired servant Ben Radcliffe.  When father Damian Lewis is murdered, all of Fackham Hall is under investigation, potentially exposing their affair.  The primary joke of the movie is the prim properness contrasting with the lowbrow humor that is rising around them.  If Zucker/Abrahams/Zucker and the Farrelly Brothers collaborated on a reboot of Downton Abbey, it would be Fackham Hall.  The movie is a tender homage to those types of films with hints of other comedic stylings, including Blake Edwards' Pink Panther films, Abbott and Costello, and a dash of Monty Python.  The movie is probably too hammy with some of its gags to hit the highs of its many influences, but this is also a movie that could have easily have been a disaster.  The film's excellent cast of talents fully committing to the bit makes it a charming and amusing, even when it misses the mark on its ambition of hilarity.  Katherine Waterston is my personal MVP for this movie, because she's an actress who absolutely would star in the type of drama this movie is mocking, but has the comedic chops the pull off everything the film desires of its cast.  It's that sort of confidence that the rest of the movie needs, though it works well enough as is.


Five Nights at Freddy's 2
⭐️
Genre:  Horror
Director:  Emma Tammi
Starring:  Josh Hutchinson, Elizabeth Lail, Piper Rubio, Freddy Carter, Wayne Knight, Mckenna Grace, Skeet Ulrich, Matthew Lillard


Calling the first Five Nights at Freddy's mediocre was generous.  Calling the sequel boring is an understatement.  The latest video game adaptation sees a vengeful spirit haunting a marionette puppet at a completely different Freddy's restaurant.  Through the power of contrivance, she winds up in the lives of the same family as the first movie and...does things.  It's a bunch of crap that the first film already did and did better, and when I can say the original Five Nights at Freddy's did things better, that's when you know you're in for a bad time.  Ultimately, Five Nights at Freddy's 2 might have some minor junk value if we weren't just stuck with these boring protagonists that these movies feel invested in, for some reason, trying to add more layers to their trauma that link straight to the stupid restaurant.  The problem with doubling down on the character arcs from the first film is that those arcs were dull and inane.  Taking them to the next level just turns the franchise's awful character-driven focus into mundanity pretending to be a freak show.  The main villain is at least somewhat creepy looking and worth a couple of jump scares, and its habit of possessing characters gives some actors a little bit of spice to their roles.  This is the only reason I can think of as to why Mckenna Grace is in this movie, who gets a sequence where she's allowed to be a possessed villain and she's actually quite good at it, even if it's only for a couple of minutes.  Other than that, she's just here to be here and is tossed aside when the movie is done with her.  I'm sure she got paid well, so I won't say she completely wasted her time.  I wish I could say the same for myself.


Hamnet
⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre:  Drama
Director:  ChloĆ© Zhao
Starring:  Jessie Buckley, Paul Mescal, Emily Watson, Joe Alwyn


This year's festival darling has entered the award season chat, becoming what most assume to be the third "lock" for a Best Picture Oscar nomination, following Sinners (which I'm rooting for) and One Battle After Another (which is this year's pattented "movie I can't stand that is probably going to win" entry).  This film adaptation of the Maggie O'Ferrell novel, Hamnet tells a dramatization of the love story and family of Willaim Shakespeare and Anne "Agnes" Hathaway.  Details about Shakespeare's life, especially as it related to his family, are sketchy at best, so the best we can hope for is an interpretation based on the few facts that we know about the time, period, and people.  Jessie Buckley plays Agnes, an outsider with a knack for medicine (which has most accusing her of witchcraft) who finds herself being wooed by a Latin tutor (guess who) played by Paul Mescal.  The two eventually marry and raise three children, including a twin boy named Hamnet, who's ill fate inspires his father to write a little play called First Action Hero AKA Hamlet.


Not a lot is known about the real life Hamnet Shakespeare, including how he died or what influence his father might have actually had taken from him in writing the play.  It's pretty much a forgone certainty that the Hamlet play was titled after him.  Hamnet as a story is a speculation of what might have been the purpose of this play and what deeper meaning it might have had to Shakespeare.  The Hamnet novel is a very interesting book because it's almost one of those dramatic interpretations of historic stories that Shakespeare would write himself, filling in the gaps of unknown details with internal monologues and plot beats written through poetry rather than realism.  It's like "The Tragedy of William Shakespeare" as told by William Shakespeare.  There are, of course, a couple of more modern flourishes that Shakespeare wouldn't have done, such as its nonlinear presentation and the fact that the book deliberately avoids saying the name "William Shakespeare" out loud to not distract from the tale of Agnes and Hamnet, but it feels like it's a work Shakespeare would have understood if he had a chance to read it.  Or he would have objected to the anacronisms and inaccuracies.  But if he were to to do that, we should ask him to hand his Julius Caesar play to the actual Caesar and see if his reaction is anything but "What the fuck?"  It's a great book, probably one of the best I've read in recent years.  If the movie were half as good, I'd be a very happy camper.

The adaptation is brought to us by Nomadland director ChloĆ© Zhao, with a screenplay by Zhao and O'Ferrell, and is a pretty faithful work, if simplified.  There are aspects of the movie that feel dumbed down, with Agnes's outsider stature being much weightier in the novel and Hamnet having a more present role.  The presentation is also streamlined, opting for a chronological narrative, which is probably not something I would have done.  The film's ditching of the novel's nonlinear structure makes the plotting feel jumpy, though not without redemption.  Passionate performances by Buckley and Mescal underlined by Zhao's fierce direction counter it back to dramatic magnificence.  The movie is very pretty, very emotionally charged, and very sad, which is what the story demands of it.  Buckley has to carry most of the film on her own shoulders, empathically trying to translate her emotions into the audience.  She's just good enough an actress to actually enchant such a spell.  Probably the biggest hurdle that Zhao faces as the director is that sometimes her take on the story is too on-the-nose.  There's a scene where Mescal is standing on a ledge over a steep cape whispering the "To be or not to be" speech which is probably the most obvious thing she could have done in this movie.  Mescal makes the trite scene workable, but it might be a hair too much.  The movie isn't as powerful as the book because of things like this, but it's a very strong work of its own.  Like its source, the film is a story of the influence of love, using it to inspire creativity, and using that creativity as therapy for a broken heart.  It's a beautiful movie, which is what a beautiful story asks for.

But it still can't top the greatest Shakespeare production of all time...


Movies Still Playing At My Theater
Eternity ⭐️⭐️1/2
Predator:  Badlands ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Rental Family ⭐️⭐️⭐️
The Running Man ⭐️⭐️1/2
Wicked:  For Good ⭐️⭐️1/2
Zootopia 2 ⭐️⭐️⭐️

New To Digital
Sarah's Oil ⭐️⭐️
Trap House ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Tron:  Ares ⭐️⭐️
Truth & Treason ⭐️⭐️1/2

Coming Soon!

Monday, December 1, 2025

Cinema Playground Journal 2025: Week 48 (My Cinema Playground)

Multiplex Madness


Eternity
⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre:  Comedy, Fantasy
Director:  David Freyne
Starring:  Elizabeth Olsen, Miles Teller, Callum Turner, John Early, Olga Merediz, Da'Vine Joy Randolph


Congratulations!  You're dead!  Now you have to make the all important decision of what the rest of eternity is going to be like for your released consciousness.  Get it done in one week or you'll be dropped into eternal nothingness.  Good luck!  This is the situation Miles Teller finds himself in when he chokes on a pretzel and dies suddenly, jumping into an afterlife of a  crowded terminal nightmare.  Eventually, his wife, Elizabeth Olsen passes away and meets him there so they can plan the rest of their eternity together.  However, the situation complicates itself when her first love, deceased soldier Callum Turner, reveals that he has been waiting for her at this junction between both worlds for over sixty years.  Now Olsen needs to choose between the rest of eternity with the man she built a life with or the man she never had the chance to.  Why she needs to choose is uncertain.  There's always the possibility that they could all somehow choose the same eternity and just figure it out from there.  That's the main issue with this movie, it's that it really has to contrive its idea in loops to make its conflict work.  Everyone in this afterlife seems so taken aback that this situation even happened.  I call bullshit on that.  A widow who remarried doesn't seem like it should be that unique a circumstance.  This absolutely happened before.  And the premise of the afterlife is too basic and underdeveloped for it to really hit it off.  The premise of this movie hinges on the idea that the afterlife is "just one thing forever" and you have to decide what it is with travel agents at a crowded airport.  Are we sure this isn't just Hell?  Because this sounds an awful lot like purgatory.  It's a played up premise that's wants to enhance the themes of "what was" vs. "what could have been," but it can't take off because it feels strained.  The movie's safe space is in performance, especially with Elizabeth Olsen, who is so into her persona of a retro housewife that you could have sworn she got trapped in WandaVision again.  It's through these touching human moments that Eternity shines.  It's brand of farce just never justifies itself.


The Thing with Feathers
⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Drama, Horror
Director:  Dylan Southern
Starring:  Benedict Cumberbatch, David Thewlis


If you ever wanted to see Big Bird kick the crap out of Benedict Cumberbatch, boy do I have a movie for you.  Based on a short story, Cumberbatch plays a widower who is grieving the loss of his wife, who eventually finds that he has an unexpected guest living in his home, a giant crow ("He's a wisecracker!") with the voice of David Thewlis.  It's a metaphor!  ::hammy grin::  The crow ("That's one 'o!'") is grief and he's living with it!  In all seriousness, this movie probably could have worked but its reach exceeds its grasp.  It wants to be so insightful and empathetic but while it's craftsmanship shows promise, the pieces can't always be taken seriously enough.  The movie's primary problem lies with how it has chosen to bring the crow ("I'm different!") character to life, which is wildly inconsistent.  The character is played by a man in a suit, which I fully support, and the suit is actually quite nice.  Unfortunately, it was obviously constructed to be effective in the shadows and when it needs to take a more prominent role in the story, it doesn't resonate and it becomes unintentionally hilarious.  There are points in this movie where the crow ("Oh brother!") is framed beautifully for unsettling effect.  They make the portions where it's not filmed effectively loom even funnier.  What's worse is that the crow (If you don't get what I'm doing here, you're in the wrong place) has dialogue and the costume isn't versatile enough for that kind of puppetry.  He instead talks without moving his mouth, like an old Garfield cartoon.  It's a movie that's trying to be powerful that becomes hard to take seriously.  But it tried, so I'll give it a pat on the head.


Wake Up Dead Man
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Mystery
Director:  Rian Johnson
Starring:  Daniel Craig, Josh O'Connor, Josh Brolin, Glenn Close, Mila Kunis, Jeremy Renner, Kerry Washington, Andrew Scott, Cailee Spaeny, Daryl McCormack, Thomas Hayden Church


By spending an absurd amount of money on the sequel to the 2019 mystery movie Knives Out, Netflix's quest to prove streaming is the place for the hottest movies might have accidentally proved to me that the theatrical experience is irreplaceable.  Last month, Netflix's limited theatrical engagement of Frankenstein allowed the viewer to soak in the film's luscious visuals, while my theatrical experience with both Knives Out sequels was a reminder of the thrill of audience engagement, being in a packed house full of people who are fully hooked and going on the same ride that you are.  You can watch all of these movies at home, but you only get one first impression, and having that impression while doing laundry or playing on your phone isn't the same.  That's probably why Netflix is content with producing as much forgettable garbage as it does, because they're perfect experiences if you're not paying attention to them.  Some movies aren't meant to be tossed aside so you can ignore the next movie on the autoplay option.  Every once in a while there is something special on there.  Probably the best Netflix original movie is Nimona, which I lament not being able to own on blu-ray, while my 4K copy of Knives Out looks lonesome without its siblings.

Wake Up Dead Man is the third movie in this series, which sees Josh Brolin play an angry priest who has been murdered in a seemingly impossible manner.  Daniel Craig's famed detective Benoit Blanc is hired to deduce the way the murder had been conducted, or was he killed by an act of God or Satan?  Wake Up Dead Man is darker and more measured than the other Benoit Blanc films, to the point where it's probably the least fun to watch.  But it also has the wildest and least predictable third act, which makes up a lot of ground.  Previous Blanc movies tried to subvert expectations by doing an unconventional presentation of its murder mystery, with both Knives Out and Glass Onion masking what their mysteries actually were until the third act.  Wake Up Dead Man is a more conventional mystery by comparison, it just stacks more mysteries on top of each other until the grand finale, where I thoroughly didn't know what the fuck was going on and was happy to hear an explanation.  There is a majesty to the way Johnson unfolds his mystery films, though Wake Up Dead Man might be more cumbersome.  The film has a lot of characters and it doesn't always know how to incorporate them into the story in a meaningful way, with certain actors only present to be suspects but not actually have a real role in it.  Knives Out and Glass Onion were both better at character balance in this regard, but Wake Up Dead Man is certainly a worthy ride to go on for anyone who loved both of those films.  With it, Benoit Blanc is establishing himself among the greats of detective fiction, up there with Holmes and Poirot.  Though he still has a way to go before he reaches the hights of Shelby Woo.


Zootopia 2
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Comedy, Fantasy, Action
Director:  Jared Bush, Byron Howard
Starring:  Gennifer Goodwin, Jason Bateman, Ke Huy Kwan, Fortune Feimster, Andy Samberg, David Stratharn, Shakira, Idris Elba, Patrick Warburton


I should probably not get my hopes up when Disney's animation studio decides to do a sequel to one of their movies.  The best one was The Rescuers Down Under and it's all been downhill from there.  I remember being warm to Fantasia 2000 and Ralph Breaks the Internet was fine, I guess, but Frozen II and Moana 2 were both punches to the gut.  Zootopia is one of my favorite Disney animated movies, as the studio/lifestyle brand did their own take on the buddy cop flick with their own style of anthropomorphic animal characters and made a movie that was both very funny and very heartfelt.  Both Zootopia and Moana were among my favorite movies of 2016 and Disney's last two animated movies were sequels to both of these.  With Moana 2 being an absolute nothing of a movie, should I have any hope for a Zootopia 2?  Maybe I had a sliver of one.  Moana 2 had an unfortunate production upend that resulted in the film they made, whereas Zootopia 2 was a more straightforward process, so there was a possibility of something better.  Besides, the buddy cop genre is sequel saturation at its finest and doing more Zootopia actually kinda makes sense as a genre piece.  If the world can have four Lethal Weapon movies, then Zootopia needs at least as many.  In buddy cop movie terms, Zootopia 2 one of those sequels that retells a lot of the original's most memorable jokes, only louder, while telling an entertaining, if less dynamic-servicing, story that will please fans of the original.  I guess that makes this the Rush Hour 2 of Disney movies.  I was kinda hoping for the Bad Boys II of Disney movies, but I'll take it.

The movie takes place a week after the first one.  Enthusiastic police bunny Judy Hopps is desperate to keep her momentum from saving the city by doing big time busts, while her sly fox partner Nick Wilde is more concerned about his own skin than actually solving crime.  Their latest case leads to a timid snake who might harbor a secret to Zootopia's origins and change the town's perception of itself forever.  To be honest, this is a little too lore heavy for me.  Zootopia's least interesting aspect is Zootopia itself.  I don't much care why animals evolved into a peaceful city.  Cartoons have done "animals as stand-ins for people" since their inception and they don't suddenly need an internal logic to this.  The story does provide some decent scenery change for the movie, though I'm not totally invested in where it's going, nor does it really feed into the character conflict between Judy and Nick.  The duo just kind of trots around on the quest and bicker, sometimes with endearment.  I do confess to be a little lost on what their relationship is supposed to be.  The screenplay to this movie reads like it's fangirling over shipping Judy and Nick together, which raises a thousand questions about interspecies sexual relations and procreation that I doubt a Disney movie is equipped to answer.  But Zootopia has always been an allegory for interracial relations, so I guess I shouldn't care.  The final movie holds itself back on defining it as anything beyond platonic, though it always seems excited about potentially opening that door.  Maybe Zootopia 3 will explore the meaning of the term "going at it like jackrabbits."

Also, Zootopia already has another evil mayor.  After a week.  I get that we shouldn't trust politicians but, my god, Zootopia's political system is fucked.

Anyway, I digress.  Those are all the things that make Zootopia 2 a little weird, but it's actually a fun little movie.  Not as good as the first, but the character dynamics are continually charming.  Judy and Nick are still an excellent pairing and the movie is still very funny.  Like the first, it's a buddy cop movie for kids and the tropes loan themselves well to the world the film creates.  The movie also gets surprisingly dark and heavy during its third act, which is it's strongest portion.  I was fully invested in how it was going to play out, even if the ride didn't compare to how charming the original was.  For what it's worth, Zootopia 2 is probably the best Disney sequel since Fantasia 2000, and the best Disney animation since Encanto.  It's not great, but it's a strong option for family movie night, which is exactly what it wants to be.

Movies Still Playing At My Theater
Nuremberg ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Predator:  Badlands ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Rental Family ⭐️⭐️⭐️
The Running Man ⭐️⭐️1/2
Sisu:  Road to Revenge ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Tron:  Ares ⭐️⭐️
Wicked:  For Good ⭐️⭐️1/2

New To Digital
Blue Moon ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Bugonia ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Good Fortune ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Regretting You ⭐️⭐️1/2

New To Physical
Anemone ⭐️⭐️1/2
Bone Lake ⭐️⭐️1/2
Coyotes ⭐️⭐️
Eleanor the Great ⭐️⭐️1/2
Primitive War ⭐️⭐️⭐️
The Roses ⭐️⭐️⭐️

Coming Soon!