Monday, September 15, 2025

Cinema Playground Journal 2025: Week 37 (My Cinema Playground)

Multiplex Madness


The Baltimorons
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Comedy
Director:  Jay Duplass
Starring:  Michael Strassner, Liz Larson, Olivia Luccardi


Both odd and oddly endearing, The Baltimorons is an interesting display of an unlikely bond formed by seasonal depression.  Those always form the strongest relationships, probably.  I don't know, really.  Just assuming.  Screenwriter Michael Strassner plays the lead, a man who last-minute bails on his girlfriend's Christmas Eve get-together when he breaks a molar, causing him to need emergency dental work.  The only dentist who picks up the phone during the holiday is lonely-heart Liz Larson, who patches him up and tries to send him on his way but an unfortunate series of events keeps the two together as they tour Christmastime Baltimore.  I think a lot of The Baltimorons' strength lies in that it feels like the premise is just taking two characters, throwing them together, and seeing where the story takes them.  The movie feels metaphorically about those moments in life that you just jump into, where you don't know what the future will be that stems from that moment, and it probably isn't great but you need to do it anyway.  I like that little vibe of "the moment" that the movie has.  I think it goes a little further than I would have liked it to, as it takes a turn of "sexual tension" that I wasn't really feeling the vibe of but the movie seems really into.  I also kind of feel like some of the supporting characters get shafted in the movie, especially Strassner's girlfriend, played by Olivia Luccardi, who is kind of delt a really shitty hand in this screenplay and the movie just kind of brushes her to the side as almost unimportant.  But the movie is a really interesting Christmas comedy, otherwise.  It's a little dark, a little cringe, and a little heartwarming.  Somehow, that seems like the right vibe for Christmas.


Downton Abbey:  The Grand Finale
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Drama
Director:  Simon Curtis
Starring:  Hugh Bonneville, Michelle Dockery, Jim Carter, Paul Giamatti, Elizabeth McGovern, Penelope Wilton, Laura Carmichael, Raquel Cassidy, Paul Copley, Brendan Coyle, Kevin Doyle, Michael Fox, Joanne Froggatt, Harry Hadden-Paton, Robert James-Collier, Alan Leech, Phyllis Logan, Sophie McShera, Leslie Nicol, Douglas Reith, Dominic West, Simon Russell Beale, Arty Froushan, Alessanrdo Nivola, Joely Richardson


Downton Abbey is back to shovel posh comfort food into your mouth until you choke on it.  Love it or hate it, nobody has that recipe nailed like Downton Abbey.  Bridgerton, maybe, but Bridgerton is more of a spicy smut rag finger food.  Downton Abbey is the classy vegan tray.  I've probably watched more Downton Abbey than you'd expect for a man who has seen every episode of Mystery Science Theater ten times.  I have no explanation for this.  Sometimes things just fall in front of my eyes.  I've also watched all three of the movies in a theater.  I have no one to blame but myself.  Perhaps I just have a thing for Michelle Dockery and seeing her in sparkly jewelry and fabulous gowns is a fetish of mine.  I'll never tell.

Scandal rocks the status quo of Downton, as word breaks out that Lady Mary Crawley and Henry Talbot are...(dramatic pause)...divorced!  ::gasp:: Well, I never!  Mary's socialite status falters in the wake of her nuptials being shattered, but the heiress must gain control of her family's name and reputation as her father Robert prepares to retire and pass the reigns of Downton to her.  All of the drama of polite conversations of spoiled rich white people talking about maintaining wealth, finances, investment, and stature is intact.  The plucky help is still offering counterprogramming, with the friendly "Happy to serve!" spirit that is underlined with a hint of common folk charm, along with the stern ones who take their work even more seriously that the aristocrats that hire them.  Everything that makes Downton Abbey what it is can be fully accounted for and it's just as self-adorning as ever.  I love how Downton is always revealed the same way the Enterprise is revealed in a Star Trek movie.  Slow, methodically, full of love, and letting the music whisk the viewer off into their fantasy.  It's a setting that the fans of the series find warmth in and they want to bask in it.  The characters are still ingrained in their pretention, though wry enough to humanize them.  There are small laughs here and there to take slight pleasure in, probably the highlight being when Robert tours an apartment flat and tries to wrap his head around the idea of it as a living space that non-wealthy people have to use, which is a hearty chuckle of a scene, I don't care who you are.  It's those little crosses between the pampered and the middlebrow that make the amusement in the movie glow.

"Is this funny or impertinent?"
"Find it funny, please."

Is this the best one?  I will admit that I don't remember the first movie all that well, which was pre-pandemic and that was a thousand years ago.  I remember liking how fun-spirited the second one was, with that low stakes story about a movie being filmed at Downton.  The Grand Finale is more relevant to the character arcs told through the series, which means this one might be the most dramatically satisfying of the three.  After all, one of Downton Abbey's earliest conflicts is Robert Crawley's struggle with the fact that he did not have a male heir and Mary facing the reality that what she felt was her birthright will be passed on to someone else.  The Grand Finale fully pays that off here in his final acceptance that he must pass his legacy on to his daughter, who is currently separated from her husband and free from male influence to distract from the fact that she now has full authority of the estate.  This feels like the best possible conclusion to this story.

Downton Abbey fans got pretty spoiled with a show that not only had a healthy lifespan on TV but concluded with three movies that are all in step with the spirit that made them fall in love with it.  There's nothing about any of these movies that make them feel more cinematic than their TV source material, but seeing the lush locales and stunning sets on a giant screen has more charm to it than you'd expect.  Now we have a complete trilogy to cap everything off.  Firefly only got one movie.  The Walking Dead's big screen continuation was dicked around with and cancelled.  And we're still waiting to see if the Community movie is just a pipe-dream.  Downton Abbey lived the dream.  Good for Downton Abbey.  They really showed them who was boss with that "Six seasons and a movie" rally call.


The Long Walk
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Thriller
Director:  Francis Lawrence
Starring:  Cooper Hoffman, David Jonsson, Mark Hamill, Garrett Wareing, Tut Nyuot, Charlie Plummer, Ben Wang, Roman Griffith Davis, Josh Hamilton, Judy Greer


The second of three Stephen King adaptations this year, and the first of two based on his run under the pseudonym Richard Bachman, The Long Walk is the story of a group of adolescent boys who are selected for a "long walk," where they have to continually walk forward at a pace of three miles per hour or get shot in the head.  Winner gets a prize!  The Long Walk is an interesting story because it works as sort of this life allegory for the working class where people are forced forward by the privileged until they are in an exhausted state, filling time by bullshitting to keep their own spirits up.  One by one, they all drop, leaving those who knew them briefly behind to continue in their exhaution until its their turn to drop.  The actual competition itself doesn't seem to have a purpose, it's just a nihilistic display of the powerful to remind people that they have the power.  There is almost perfection in the concept because its a nihilistic display of puposelessness that tells a purposeful display of nihilism through its story.  It's hard to make nihilism meaningful, though Stephen King found a doorway in.  The fundamentals don't have much different than any other live-or-die dystopian competitive tale such as Battle Royale, Death Race 2000, that terrible book series that I'd rather not bring up, and another Stephen King story that is getting a new adaptation in November, The Running Man.  That being said, The Long Walk doesn't focus on action so the characters have to fill up the time with personality, each telling their own stories in their own words, hoping it doesn't end here.

Fans of the book will likely be pleased that most of it is stuffed in the movie, even though character traits have been jumbled around.  Normally, this would have been done to make the screenplay tighter and reel in the amount of characters to work in a film's runtime, but the curious thing is that this doesn't seem to be the case here.  The movie has about the same amount of speaking characters as the book, they just seem to be sharing each other's arcs without much reason.  It feels like the only purpose of this is to keep book-readers on their toes even if the movie doesn't really play with expectation enough for that to have any serious impact.  That is, aside from the ending, which is a complete rewrite.  The ending to the book is nothing to write home about and I have no inclination to be protective of it, but the ending to the movie is a flat attempt to make it more theatrical that only feels numb and meaningless.  If one was going to change the already not-excellent ending of the book, the last idea I would have chased is "Let's make it even more melodramatic."  But I guess director Francis Lawrence picked up too many bad habits from that other survival thriller book series that has been strangling his career.

Not enough of this offsets The Long Walk from being a mostly good experience.  Small flaws weight it back, as it could be less lean and meatier.  It feels brief, so the length of time that these characters have been walking barely sets in, and the characters rarely look as exhausted as they should be in an attempt to keep everyone in "Hollywood bad shape" instead of actual bad shape.  A lot of the violence is overly animated with CGI, making the film feel like a cartoon when it's trying to be haunting.  It undermines itself, sadly.  The story is still interesting, but it doesn't hit as hard as it could.


Spinal Tap II:  The End Continues
⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre:  Comedy, Mockumentary
Director:  Rob Reiner
Starring:  Christopher Guest, Michael McKean, Harry Shearer, Rob Reiner


Spinal Tap is back, baby!  The fake band that was made famous by one of the greatest mockumentaries ever made broke up years ago and are now convinced to come out of retirement for a final reunion concert.  And yes, they have a new drummer.  Let's all pray that she doesn't die like the last eleven.  To be frank, I wasn't entirely sure what to expect.  I've seen This Is Spinal Tap, but while I enjoyed it quite a bit, it's been years and I was weary of what revisiting these characters might look like so long after the fact.  The movie loses something in how glossy it looks, but that's also because it looks like a modern documentary and not an 80's documentary.  Seeing the band together after so long but as old men feels a little deflating, but then you realize how many period rock stars are the same age and are still active, including ones who have cameos in this movie.  Spinal Tap feels a little different because they existed in that time capsule that is the original movie (and you can always pretend their story ends with that episode of The Simpsons that they cameoed in and perished), so seeing them aged feels hard to swallow, but I'm also willing to accept it if the movie is good.  Full of snickers instead of belly laughs, Spinal Tap II never fully sells that the world is richer for reuniting the band forty years later.  But if This Is Spinal Tap were to have any companion film at all, I'm just thankful that it's reasonably fun.  There is a lot of good material to mine from the artists, as they combat a sleazy new manager and try to move past old beefs, all of which bring fun sequences to the table.  I also greatly enjoyed their new drummer, Didi, mostly because I like a punk rock drummer girl.  I wish she were in more of the movie, because she's such an energetic presence, but I understand keeping the focus on the core three so I'll begrudgingly accept that she's strictly a background character.  But what it boils down to is that Spinal Tap II is a not-very-special sequel to a very special movie.  It's really hard to run away from that, even if it's probably worth watching once if you're a Spinal Tap fan.


Traumatika
⭐️1/2
Genre:  Horror
Director:  Pierre Tsigaridis
Starring:  Rebekah Kennedy, Ranen Navat, Emily Goss, Susan Gayle Watts


Traumatika is one of those horror movies that declined to show footage of itself in ads because it was "too terrifying."  Normally, when this happens it's because the movie is cheap trash and they don't want the customer to know it, so they show off as little as possible.  I wish I could say Traumatika bucks that trend but, honestly, it just solidifies it.  It's a shame because Traumatika shows promise in the beginning.  It's at its strongest during the opening twenty minutes when its just a confident tour of its grotesqueries and showcasing star Rebekah Kennedy being fully committed to whatever twisted thing it asks her to do.  When it comes time to explain what the fuck is going on, the movie wears its flaws like a broken toilet.  That opening, though, which sees Kennedy playing a witch-like woman crawling around and haunting a little boy through a house is an excellent short film, by itself.  The movie misses a step when it provides context for it, allowing lesser actors to ham up lackluster roles.  Then the movie grinds to a halt in its second half, which follows up on the type of adult the young boy from the prologue becomes.  This portion of the movie is slow, boring, and not really anything.  I think the movie convinced itself it's about adults who don't confront their demons becoming those demons.  It's hard to ignore the theme being trauma because the movie continuously states in dialogue that this is what it's about.  What exactly it's trying to say about trauma is a bit murky.  Maybe it's about needing to go to therapy now before you become a serial killer, but feels more like utilizing trauma to put on a geek show.  That probably would have worked better if an hour of this movie didn't feel like unnecessary padding to an opening that felt like it was the only portion of the movie with vision.  But telling stories is hard, especially when you don't have a story to tell and just wing it.

Movies Still Playing At My Theater
Caught Stealing ⭐️⭐️⭐️
The Fantastic 4:  First Steps ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Freakier Friday ⭐️⭐️1/2
The Roses ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Superman ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Weapons ⭐️⭐️⭐️

New To Digital
Honey Don't! ⭐️⭐️
The Naked Gun ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Strange Harvest ⭐️⭐️
Weapons ⭐️⭐️⭐️

New To Physical
Ballerina ⭐️⭐️1/2
Bride Hard ⭐️
Clown in a Cornfield ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Elio ⭐️⭐️1/2
Materialists ⭐️⭐️⭐️
The Ritual ⭐️1/2

Coming Soon!

Monday, September 8, 2025

Cinema Playground Journal 2025: Week 36 (My Cinema Playground)

Multiplex Madness


The Conjuring:  Last Rites
⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Horror
Director:  Michael Chavez
Starring:  Patrick Wilson, Vera Farmiga, Mia Tomlinson, Ben Hardy


Our favorite spook chasers who don't wear Proton Packs are back, except this time it's canonically the mid-80s so they can finally make Ghostbusters references too (and you better believe that they make Ghostbusters references).  Ed and Lorraine Warren are in retirement in 1986, only to be forced back into the game when a super evil mirror makes a house haunted with smiling ghosts, which is also connected to a case from the Warrens' past that coincided with the birth of their daughter.  More Warrens in a haunted house, testing the limits of the spirits and dealing with their own personal drama.  It's a return to the formula of the first two films for those who thought the third was too outside the box.  It's a more melodramatic presentation of said formula, but it's trying to be scary movie comfort food as opposed to a shock to the senses.

Most of the film's weaknesses stem from director Michael Chavez, who has never been as effective a director as series originator James Wan and it's slightly embarrassing that the producers push him as hard as they do.  I'm not sure what it was about The Curse of La Llorona that made them go "Yes, this is the guy" or if it's a budget thing and they keep hiring him because he's cheap, but Chavez is taking the franchise that housed talents like Wan, David Sandberg, and Gary Dauberman and making it stale.  Chavez is not an incapable director, but he doesn't elevate a screenplay like Wan (The Conjuring 2 would have been much worse in the hands of a less stylized director).  He's going to succumb to the drawbacks of a script because he just doesn't have a lot to offer in return.  That's not to say he's incapable of putting together an unnerving scene.  He has a few in the tank.  Chavez likes to use sequences that predominately involve hands as a focal point, for some reason.  What he does with them is not exactly scary but he likes to visualize them in interesting ways.  There is also a sequence in a mirrored room that is quite striking.

The horror is countered by the family drama centering on the aging Warrens, as the movie is primarily about them accepting that their baby girl is a grown woman now.  Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga are just as charismatic as they've always been, giving the franchise a beating heart under all the terror.  The balance between the drama and the suspense is more off-kilter than it has ever been in this series, as the haunting story feels more like an afterthought at times.  The Warrens don't even interact with it until the third act, making the film feel like a drama and a horror movie warring with each other for audience attention.  It's this indecisiveness over what story the movie is committing to that exhausts it.  It's easily the weakest of the Conjuring movies, but it's also surprisingly difficult to dislike.  It's also better than two of the five Ghostbusters movies, so the Warrens can take comfort in that.


Lurker
⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Drama, Thriller
Director:  Alex Russell
Starring:  Théodore Pellerin, Archie Madekwe, Zack Fox, Havana Rose Liu, Wale Onayemi, Daniel Zolghadri, Sunny Suljic


A rising music star accepts some rando into his inner circle to help with filming his videos and documentation, not realizing that the fucking weirdo is completely obsessed with him.  Sounds like the traditional "public figure meets psychotic fan" narrative that has been done many times.  Most of those movies are done more for pop entertainment, while Lurker is hoping to be more artistic and psychological.  I'm not convinced it succeeded.  The internal conflict I have with this movie is that I get what it's going for and technically it's as well-made as it could possibly be but it feels like a portrayal of an idea that it doesn't fully understand.  It's not psychologically satisfying because everyone comes off one-dimensional and events play out too forced.  To be fair, the movie does try to keep its obsessive main character enigmatic, which is tricky to do.  The problem is that I can't get invested in a psychological presentation if the movie isn't interested in giving me a picture of psychology.  It's just a creepy guy doing creepy things.  Does he know he's creepy?  Probably not.  Nobody else seems to care that he's creepy though.  At least, not for a good long while.  The movie is at its most interesting in the third act, when the character has an aura of tension around him that other characters just stop cold the moment he enters a scene.  I would have enjoyed this more if the movie had a more satisfying endgame to any of this, offering up an unconventional ending that is supposed to be a curveball.  It just makes the entire film feel like suffering for nothing, though.

The more I reflect on this movie, the more I find that it has in common with another "cringe thriller" from earlier this year called Friendship.  That movie also centered on a desperate outsider that found himself in a friend group that he idealized and became more psychotic once he was denied it.  Friendship at the very least kept its viewers in on the headspace of its main character, causing one to understand him even if they couldn't sympathize with him.  The main character of Lurker is such a distant enigma that it's hard to do the same with him.  We spend a lot of time with him but we never actually know him.  The film's character development is limited to his longing glances at the object of his desire, making it clear that the movie wants to be a thriller spin on a twisted homoerotic romance.  But he's an empty character that just does things for attention.  There is no nuance to his psychological state that makes the film a worthwhile commentary.  Without that commentary, it feels like it's goal is demonizing the socially awkward in a package that can also be interpreted as homophobic.  That just feels gross.


Splitsville
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Comedy
Director:  Michael Angelo Covino
Starring:  Dakota Johnson, Adria Arjona, Kyle Marvin, Michael Angelo Covino, Nicholas Braun, David Castañeda, O-T Fagbenli, Charlie Gillespi, Simon Webster


Age-old adages say lots of things like "the grass is always greener on the other side of the fence" or "absence makes the heart grow fonder," both of which seem to make up the premise of Splitsville, a crazed comedy about our contradictory longing for freedom fighting our own longing for companionship.  This knockout effort sees Kyle Marvin reacting to wife Adria Arjona's request for a divorce by bolting to Michael Angelo Covino's house for comfort, where Angelo Covino confesses that he is in an "open relationship" with wife Dakota Johnson.  Marvin winds up having sex with Johnson, which Angelo Covino reacts negatively to and spirals into a depression as a result.  Marvin then tries to save his marriage by proposing openness to Arjona, which she gleefully takes advantage of while Marvin begins to realize that he might actually be in love with Johnson.  The premise is a trainwreck in the best possible sense, as it keeps the viewer on their toes as to see just how messed up this scenario is going to get.  To top things off, this movie has some of the best comic staging I've seen in a very long time.  Comedies aren't known for their cinematography, editing, or choreography but when you have lengthy bouts of slapstick sequences, the correct framing, pacing, and stunts can make or break it.  Splitsville painstakingly makes sure to get it right, allowing its kinetic branches of chaos to glide with ease.  This movie doesn't fully rely on slapstick either, switching back and forth between that style and screwball comedy when it decides to be more characterized.  The male leads shine with the former and the ladies with the latter.  If I were to judge a little harshly, I'd say Johnson and Arjona are given roles with greater personality than their co-stars, and Marvin, in particular, is too much of a passive protagonist that things just happen to.  Other than that, the balance is splendidly done.  So much so that I could easily picture a version of this movie that would have been made in the 1940's, albeit with some of the more promiscuous details danced around.  It's a movie that takes classical beats of farce that never get old and freshens them up and gives them a new spin.  I, for one, absolutely loved the ride.


The Threesome
⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre:  Comedy, Romance
Director:  Chad Hardigan
Starring:  Zoey Deutch, Jonah Hauer-King, Ruby Cruz, Jabouki Young-White, Josh Segarra, Robert Longstreet, Arden Myrin, Kristen Slaysman, Allan McLeod, Julia Sweeney


Obviously, we needed more than one edgy romcom about non-monogamy gone south this week, so here is The Threesome to provide us with more intercourse shenanigans.  Jonah Hauer-King crushes hard on Zoey Deutch, who chooses not to acknowledge his sad puppy dog eyes.  But the minute he begins chatting it up with random stranger Ruby Cruz, Deutch's jealous bug takes over and she takes control of the situation by highjacking their night which ultimately culminates with a ménage à trois between the trio.  Deutch and Hauer-King try to have a budding romance in the aftermath, when Deutch suddenly discovers that she is pregnant.  Things get more complicated when Cruz also reveals that she is pregnant.  Every man's wildest dream turns into every man's worst nightmare pretty fast.

The film isn't particularly well-made.  The direction is messy and the film's music cues are strange, both of which feel like they're undercutting the film's humor throughout the picture.  The fact that the film is still capably funny at times has a lot to do with its chosen leads who give grace to a less-than-stellar production.  The movie sounds wacky but it's less wacky than you'd expect.  It's actually quite earnest.  The movie's sense of humor derives from awkwardness without deriving from cringe.  It's almost as if it's trying to be sweet despite its smutty premise.  It doesn't entirely succeed but it's cute that it tried.  I mean, a movie with the jokey line of "I want to have this abortion with you" can only be so earnest without breaking character.  The movie doesn't have a lot of logic to it, though it does counter it with some strengths on its own terms.  There is actually an interesting theme of romantic idealism and reality failing to live up to it.  I didn't expect that from a movie about "Bro, two chicks at once?  Niiiiiiice."

The movie would be more interesting if there were a stronger conflict at its core.  This romcom premise is aching for a love triangle angle but it surprisingly shoots that down pretty early on.  Since they don't aim for that, it's a pretty basic romance with an awkward third wheel that the movie has little use for.  Ruby Cruz's character doesn't do a whole lot in this movie.  She's mostly an excuse to get the other people around her to argue about her.  By comparison, Zoey Deutch overwhelms the movie's main story by talking swiftly in mostly double entandre and dirty talk.  Most of the comedy comes from her, and I'm assuming this was likely because the movie was sold as a vehicle for Deutch (she has a producing credit on the movie).  If it is, it's strange that it's focusing on one actress in particular for this particular movie when a rich ensemble of the three leads with three juicy roles would have made this premise so much more enticing.  Cruz does well with what she has, though.  And she is also the second actress from the movie Bottoms that I've seen in a movie this week (following Havana Rose Liu in Lurker), in almost a spiritual successor to last week's unofficial Doctor Who theme.  Though if one wants to continue on from that trend, the central male character is played by Jonah Hauer-King, who played Ruby Sunday's douchy boyfriend in the latest season of the long-running sci-fi/fantasy series.

I expect most of these flaws won't matter to its target audience, who will likely eat up the taboo premise and enjoy the awkward tension.  Being a flawed product never seems to hurt romcoms much.  Just ask Anyone but You.  The Threesome is a more enjoyable and funnier movie than Anyone but You, so for that audience I can safely say it's worth a gander.  It could be sexier, it could be more romantic, it could be funnier, it could be more of all of those things you're going to ask of it, but it does hand out a product that sells exactly what the title suggests.


Tinā
⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Drama
Director:  Miki Magasiva
Starring:  Anapela Polataivao, Antonia Robinson, Beulah Koale, Nicole Whippy, Dalip Sondhi, Jamie Irving, Alison Bruce


Well-meaning, if generic, inspirational drama sees a grieving mother take on a job as a substitute teacher at a prep school, eventually leading the school choir.  Teacher and student bonding, life lessons, reignited will, laughter, tears, and all that jazz.  Movies like this could be better but you could also do a lot worse.  It's the type of movie made by someone who thinks cinema peaked with Dead Poets Society and thinks more movies should be Dead Poets Society so they decided to do their part in making a less interesting Dead Poets Society.  The secret to a movie like this always lies in who they cast in the inspirational teacher role, and one of the reasons Dead Poets Society is so fondly remembered is because it was an early showcase for the incredibly talented Robin Williams.  Tinā has Anapela Polataivao, who is charming enough without actually being a powerhouse presence.  Sometimes her role feels undercut by a questionable moment or two.  There is one particular moment where the movie comedically has her making an idle threat of "I'm gonna kill you" hypebole toward her students, which feels like an awful attempt at endearment humor to me.  As such, little imperfections about the movie make it weaker than it would be otherwise.  The moment where Polataivao is crying over the corpse of her dead daughter is obviously meant to be powerful but it loses impact based on the fact that the deceased supposedly died in an earthquake but is in a flawless state.  No bruises, no dirt, not even messed up hair.  The movie exists in that realm where it's trying to be so hard to be a relatable life story but it's presented in a package that looks fake.  This is not even bringing up screenplay issues, that compound as it goes along.  When it hits the home stretch, there is almost too much happening.  Important events happen in the blink of an eye with lackluster context, then it just pushes forward not noticing that its plot has broken down on the side of the road and needs a tow truck.

Apparently, this movie was quite the smash hit in its native country of New Zealand, where it became one of the highest grossing domestic films at its own domestic box office.  I'd like to think that a lot of my critiques boil down to cultural barrier but most of the issues I have are from the production itself.  I'm happy that it at least found an audience, though.


Twinless
⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre:  Comedy, Drama
Director:  James Sweeney
Starring:  Dylan O'Brien, James Sweeney, Aisling Franciosi, Lauren Graham


Dylan O'Brien's twin brother suddenly dies and he seeks out a support group for born twins with deceased siblings for comfort.  That's where he meets James Sweeney, and the two strike an unlikely bond of near brotherhood.  That's where the movie starts.  Where the movie goes is a different story.  What starts out as a contemplative dramedy switches gears early on, enveloping the viewer in a twisted and complicated narrative.  It's not often movies like this leave me guessing where they're going but Twinless is a surprising exception.  The film is at the very least consistent about what its theme is, always centering on loneliness and the longing for companionship.  O'Brien's character is a flawed character, who deals with his demons through pent up anger and violent tendencies which rear their heads at random points in the film and threaten to derail the few healthy relationships he builds in this movie.  Sweeney's character is arguably in a less healthy mental state, giving more context for what he's going through as the film goes.  Unfortunately, the positive relationship he builds with O'Brien is also the least healthy thing in the movie for him.  He brings so many positive things to O'Brien's life, but they're under his own cloud and he's doing them for reasons that are psychologically maddening.  Unlike a film reviewed above, Lurker, Sweeney's character is actually fleshed out and we understand all of his worst decisions.  We feel bad for him but we also want to take him aside and tell him that he crossed a line long ago and if he continues down it, everything is going to hurt much worse in the end.  It's a funny movie and a sad movie, brought to life by a pair of excellent performances.  The film is a yearning for unconditional love that only a family can provide even when we're in our most fucked up mental state.

Movies Still Playing At My Theater
The Bad Guys 2 ⭐️⭐️1/2
Caught Stealing ⭐️⭐️⭐️
F1 ⭐️⭐️
The Fantastic 4:  First Steps ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Freakier Friday ⭐️⭐️1/2
Jaws ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
The Roses ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Superman ⭐️⭐️⭐️
The Toxic Avenger ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Weapons ⭐️⭐️⭐️

New To Digital
Nobody 2 ⭐️⭐️⭐️
She Rides Shotgun ⭐️⭐️⭐️

Coming Soon!

Monday, September 1, 2025

Cinema Playground Journal 2025: Week 35 (My Cinema Playground)

Multiplex Madness


Caught Stealing
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Action, Thriller, Comedy
Director:  Darren Aronofsky
Starring:  Austin Butler, Regina King, Zöe Kravitz, Matt Smith, Vincent D'Onfrio, Liev Schrieber, Carol Kane


Darren Aronofsky's latest is an adaptation of a book series by Charlie Huston, which Huston provides the screenplay for.  Austin Butler stars as a man who is unwittingly swept up in neighbor Matt Smith's dirty dealings, as a bunch of baddies start knocking on his door thinking he's his accomplice.  The movie is a departure for Aronofsky, taking a break from his metaphorical dramas (which I'm assuming is what Mother! was) and taking a swing at an action thriller.  Aronofsky's eye allows for some unique framing of frantic action making a furious movie that is always fun to watch, even if its narrative gets jumpy.  Matt Smith steals the movie, which is typical of the former Doctor Who star as he's given the most colorful character and is less of an avatar for chase scenes than everyone else is.  There's not a lot that's surprising or substantial about the movie but it's a quality chase movie for those looking for a little bit of a ride.


The Roses
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Comedy
Director:  Jay Roache
Starring:  Olivia Colman, Benedict Cumberbatch, Andy Samburg, Kate McKinnon, Allison Janney, Belinda Bromilow, Sunita Mani, Ncuti Gatwa, Jamie Demetriou, Zöe Chao


Most of the black comedy has been sucked out of this update of War of the Roses, opting to turn into a screwball comedy to play up the strengths of its leads.  It survives based on the fact that those leads are so goddamn funny in it.  Olivia Colman and Benedict Cumberbatch star as the titular couple, who fall in love and set off to persue their dreams with the perfect marriage.  When Colman's career takes off and Cumberbatch's fails spectacularly, a resentment between the two begins to swell until it boils over into violence.  Interestingly enough, the movie isn't particularly interested in mutual fault between the two.  Cumberbatch is clearly the aggressor throughout the movie, while Colman's only crime is that she's good at what she does.  I think the idea is more interesting if they're both just bitter, awful people, like Michael Douglas and Kathleen Turner once upon a time.  They both certainly become nagging toward each other, as most of the movie's comedy has little choice but to envelop itself with amusing passive aggressive quips because it refuses to commit to making either of them unlikeable.  Or maybe Olivia Colman and Benedict Cumberbatch are just incapable of being unlikeable because they're just so damn cute when they're angry.  The movie can't help but coast on that cast charisma.  I have nothing but intense adoration for Olivia Colman and think quite highly of Benedict Cumberbatch, as well.  The supporting cast is in and out, making sure they don't outshine the stars at play.  The biggest supporting roles are Andy Samburg and Kate McKinnon as their neighbors, but they're often relegated to reaction shots as Colman and Cumberbatch open fire.  The same can be said for the rest of the support, where this movie becomes the second movie this week to feature a former Doctor Who as a supporting player, offering up recent fifteenth Doctor Ncuti Gatwa in a charming, if limited, role.  The Roses probably isn't as memorable as Danny DeVito's famed adaptation from 1989, but, in it's own way, it might be more fun.


The Short Game
⭐️1/2
Genre:  Drama, Comedy, Sports
Director:  Frank Sanza
Starring:  Ben Kreiger, Mackenzie Astin, Catherine Cunningham, Owen Himfar, Tyler Lofton, Emma Parks


A down-on-his-luck youth hopes to gain a college scholarship through golfing, and his game takes a turn for the better when his autistic little brother becomes his caddy.  This relatively simple-minded movie has only one sole ambition, which is to be a feel-good movie for a pre-existing target audience.  This movie may hold mild success in that the audience it caters to holds little scrutiny for a film like this, but when it actually plays in theaters with movies that actually know what they're doing, The Short Game doesn't hold up.  And that's not me being biased against this type of movie.  I'm all in favor of movies like this, but if a movie wants to succeed in being a "feel-good" experience, there needs to be elements of authenticity to its emotional manipulation.  The Short Game wouldn't be that bad if it didn't come off as plastic as a Barbie Dream House.

Just about every character in this movie is one-dimensional, they all have simple goals and walk from point A to B, delivering their dialogue like well-behaved actors who just recently memorized words.  The movie doesn't really try to live with them or try to make them feel organic, and it's almost astounding just how fake everyone comes off as.  There is one sole exception that the movie can learn from, if it took the time to nourish it.  The main character has a friend who follows him around with a camera and documents his whatever-the-fuck sports journey, and she is probably the most flavorful character in the movie.  She's underwritten, like the rest of the movie, but she has a vibe.  Nobody else in the movie does, and that makes her the standout.  If the rest of the movie had a vibe, this movie wouldn't be such a joyless experience telling a story that's trying to be joyful.  The movie has it so bad at expressing emotion that it even takes a traumatizing turn halfway through, which the movie plays it up as a big deal, but the film is such monotone melodrama with limited personality that it doesn't really matter.  Otherwise, most of the movie is supposed to be funny because it has this broad, warm "gee whiz" grin on its face while delivering cornball wit, like an episode of Full House.  It never really generates a laugh because of this, but I'll give it credit for trying to at least have some charm about it, even if it's the charm of a ham sandwich sitcom.

Ultimately, even if I were to give the rest of the movie a pass for being trite nothing, the film's third act is where it fails the most, coming down to an important golf competition where the bad golfers are bitter because his loving brother/caddy seems good at geometry because of autistic reasons (like in all movies, autism gives you superpowers).  The movie's final conflict has something to do with the little brother being penalized for...something...and getting kicked off the field.  Maybe I'm not brushed up on golf rules, but it really just looked to me like he stood in place and did the things a caddy is supposed to do.  I don't really know what happened and the movie doesn't make it clear.  It just invents a complication out of nothing and expects us to buy it.  It doesn't work.  The film could have found a creative bone in its body and figured it's shit out, but it wants simplistic hurdles to overcome because it wants the mental hurdles to be the real challenge.  A smart movie would have done both at the same time.  Or you just don't do a hurdle at all if it's going to be half-assed.  And that's just the movie in a nutshell, a movie that loves all the touching tropes of family dramas but doesn't seem to understand how to make them work, so it just crams them onto the screen expecting the same outcome.  I want to say this movie's heart is in the right place, because it just wants to be a simple movie about brothers who love each other, but none of that heart really burst through in the filmmaking.


The Toxic Avenger
⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre:  Comedy, Action, Horror, Superhero
Director:  Macon Blair
Starring:  Peter Dinklage, Jacob Tremblay, Taylour Paige, Kevin Bacon, Elijah Wood, Julia Davis, Jonny Coyne


Filmed several years ago, this remake of Troma's biggest IP sat on a shelf for a good long while for seemingly no reason.  It's easy to make a Toxic Avenger movie and it's easy to want to make a Toxic Avenger movie.  Toxic Avenger (and Troma productions in general) is such a self-indulgant brand that you make any film for yourself and the audience gathers by happenstance.  When it comes time to actually advertise that you've made a relatively (in comparison to other movies in the series) large-budget Toxic Avenger movie, suddenly it sinks in that you've made an expensive Toxic Avenger movie and don't know who you're marketing it toward.  A lot of people have heard the title, but unless you brave the bowels of dumpster filmmaking, you probably haven't even watched a Toxic Avenger movie.  It's pretty crazy stuff, and unless you've actually witnessed a movie produced by Troma, it's probably difficult to actually paint a picture of what a Troma movie is.  Grainy filmstock, barely-there craftsmanship, aburdist humor, and little-to-nothing to mask that everything taking place is fake.  Whatever you're picturing, drag it through the mud for five hours and maybe it would look like a Toxic Avenger movie.  I've seen the first Toxic Avenger a couple of times.  It's never been opportune for me to watch any of the sequels, but I definitely would if they were in front of me and had an afternoon to kill.  But if you have to ask if it's worth a watch for anyone else, I'd have to take it by a case-by-case basis.  But 95% of the time, the answer is "Good god, no."

The new take on Toxie stars Peter Dinklage as a janitor dying from [REDACTED] brain disease.  Because obvious bad businessman Kevin Bacon won't help him, Dinklage takes matters into his own hands by trying to steal the money he needs for treatment.  He is caught and dumped into toxic waste, which hideously deforms him while also making him absurdly strong.  These situations always result in creating a new superhero, this one known as the Toxic Avenger!  It's a more detailed story than the original, who was just a nerd caught in a practical joke gone haywire.  I guess you could say Dinklage's take on Toxie has more pathos, but there's little time for emotion when there are jaws to tear out.  And those who want a Toxic Avenger movie to do what a Toxic Avenger movie does will get it.  Those who want it to be done better will also get it, though they're still watching something that is definitely a Toxic Avenger movie.  The new movie takes the hammy absurdist exploitation of Troma's stylings and combines it with the heightened otherworldly kitsch of Tim Burton's Batman, Warren Beatty's Dick Tracy, or Chuck Russell's The Mask.  One could call it the Fury Road of Toxic Avenger movies.  It's a movie that takes what preceded it and takes it up to a level we never expected it to go to, and succeeding more than you could ever imagine.  Unlike Fury Road, the reboot of Toxic Avenger is probably not going to convert a lot of new people to its franchise, because Troma movies are a niche within a niche.  You already know if you love it, though.  And you probably saw this movie on opening weekend already.

Netflix & Chill


The Thursday Murder Club
⭐️⭐️
Streaming On:  Netflix
Genre:  Mystery, Comedy
Director:  Chris Columbus
Starring:  Helen Mirren, Pierce Brosnan, Ben Kingsley, Celia Imrie, Naomi Ackie, Daniel Mays, David Tennant


Following in the footsteps of Harry Potter and Percy Jackson, yet another popular book series has been handed to Home Alone and Mrs. Doubtfire mastermind Chris Columbus to turn into a hopeful film franchise.  Netflix is probably hoping to have a reasonable counter for the murder mystery audience once their contract with Rian Johnson is up with the release of Wake Up Dead Man in a few months.  I've been reading a lot of Agatha Christie and classic Perry Mason lately, so a dip into the Thursday Murder Club was something I took rather kindly to.  The book it's based on is pretty fun.  It digresses from its story too easily for my tastes, which is in line with its elderly protagonists who drift off into minor digressions and small-talk in general, but it's a pleasant read.  The book centers on a quartet of retirees played by powerhouse players Helen Mirren, Pierce Brosnan, Ben Kingsley, and Celia Imrie, who meet weekly and go through old case files of unsolved murders, coming up with their own theories to cold cases (you would think they would start their own podcast, but maybe that's too close to Only Murders in the Building).  They soon find themselves in the midst of fresh murder mystery, as a brand new corpse drops in their laps, linked to the shady business dealings of landowners trying to tear down the retirement home, headed by David Tennant.

THREE movies with a former Doctor Who in a supporting role?  This one sharing the screen with a former James Bond?  What have I done to be this spoiled?

The movie version of this beloved novel plays out like cinematic comfort food for a good long while.  The presentation is cozy and fluffy, and the reliable cast gives it charisma.  The movie does stay in line with the book for a good long while, even if it is a tad streamlined while cutting out some of the book's most emotionally resonate subplots.  I'd hesitate to be critical of that, because the movie probably demanded more plot focus, but it does feel like it lost some of the more interesting chapters in translation.  With that in mind, as the film hits the home stretch, it's suddenly in a hurry and rewrites the entire third act.  The reveals are the same (most of them, anyway), but it's done while trying to impress more unneeded urgency and get all of the loose ends tied as swiftly as possible.  It's a messy affair.  When one crafts a mystery, the one thing you need to nail is the ending.  The film version of the Thursday Murder Club sadly rushes to finish the job, soiling itself in its seat while doing so.  The film is light and passable, otherwise.  The cast is great and it's an easy evening watch.  You can't help but wish it were more charming and fun than it is, though.

Movies Still Playing At My Theater
The Bad Guys 2 ⭐️⭐️1/2
Eden ⭐️⭐️
F1 ⭐️⭐️
The Fantastic 4:  First Steps ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Freakier Friday ⭐️⭐️1/2
Honey Don't! ⭐️⭐️
Jaws ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Lilo & Stitch ⭐️⭐️
The Naked Gun ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Ne Zha 2 ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Nobody 2 ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Relay ⭐️⭐️1/2
Superman ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Weapons ⭐️⭐️⭐️

New To Digital
My Mother's Wedding ⭐️⭐️
Oh, Hi! ⭐️⭐️1/2
Sketch ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Together ⭐️⭐️⭐️

New To Physical
Lilo & Stitch ⭐️⭐️

Coming Soon!