Monday, April 20, 2026

Cinema Playground Journal 2026: Week 16 (My Cinema Playground)

Multiplex Madness


Busboys
⭐️
Genre:  Comedy
Director:  Jonah Being old
Starring:  David Spade, Theo Von, Tim Dillon


Almost any amount of words feels like too many to describe Busboys, a comedy about David Spade and Theo Von taking jobs as busboys in hopes of getting promoted to a lucrative waiter position to pay for a sex change operation for Von's mother, only to get caught up in a drug trafficking ring.  Busboys looks and feels like a movie made by people who long for the heyday of Happy Madison productions.  But when you go out of your way to make an off-brand Adam Sandler movie, don't be surprised that your homage to mediocrity ends up being sub-mediocre.  The film mostly seems like a push for Von to break his comedy into movies, funding the film entirely himself and penning the screenplay with the help of Spade.  The difference between the two is that Spade, a longstanding film comedy veteran, feels like he knows what he's doing and is constantly comfortable in his position.  Von does not, playing his role as if he's attempting to be a long belated replacement for Spade's late comedy partner Chris Farley.  He plays the role like an inexperienced performer who is modeling his performance of off nostalgic love of Tommy Boy and Dumb and Dumber without understanding what made those films work.  I've always maintained that comedies centered on idiocy can be funny but there needs to be a semblance of a moronic character's mental logic, otherwise it's just word salad and inconsistent outbursts.  Von's character has no consistent behavior except standing in place, looking in the distance with a slack-jawed expression.  Even outside of Von's performance, the movie isn't much of anything but a series of humdrum attempts at being outrageous.  Hell, for a movie called Busboys, there are very few scenes relevant to them being busboys.  It's just a sleepy-eyed comedy that jumps up and down for the audience's amusement.  I've seen worse but that doesn't make it better.


The Mummy
⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre:  Horror
Director:  Lee Cronin
Starring:  Jack Reynor, Laia Costa, May Calamawy, Natalie Grace, Verónica Falcón, Shylo Molina, Billie Roy


Blumhouse continues their modern reinterpretation of classic Universal monster legacies, passing the torch onto Evil Dead Rise director Lee Cronin to do an entirely fresh spin on The Mummy, probably the franchise that is currently most toxic since the Dark Universe fiasco in 2017.  This movie seems to be a less "Too many cooks" production than the last one, being solely the vision of Cronin and Blumhouse just letting him go nuts.  This movie still got undercut by Universal announcing a new sequel to the 1999 film that starred Brendan Fraser and Rachel Weisz, with Ready or Not directing duo Radio Silence at the helm, prompting pressure to retitle this film in post-production to avoid brand cross-contamination.  The compromise seems to have been calling it "Lee Cronin's The Mummy," though the tiny font used in the film's title screen seems to indicate that nobody really wants to call it that.  I'm not really one to follow such a vain title scheme anyway.  Only tools refer to something fully as "John Carpenter's Halloween" or "Wes Craven's New Nightmare."

One would assume a new Mummy movie would be about a reanimated corpse, like all previous Mummy films.  This one is a bit more...imaginative.  A little girl goes missing in Egypt, only to be recovered eight years later trapped in a sarcophagus, somehow still alive.  She returns home in a traumatized state, though her behavior begins growing more unnerving as her parents try to understand what has happened to her.  Not a traditional type of mummy for this film, though I supposed technically this girl was mummified, so it probably counts.  Going from the likes of Imhotep and Kharis to a little girl named Katie feels a little jarring, but Natalie Grace is uniformly excellent throughout the movie, so if the goal was quality creepy kid horror cinema, they found an excellent creepy kid.  Cronin borrows his "not even children are safe" vibe from his Evil Dead Rise, effectively making it known that those usually immune to horror violence are still not safe in his new film, getting even the other children of the family in on the carnage.  If there is nothing else I can say in this film's favor, it's that it keeps you guessing whether or not a happy ending is possible and it still will surprise you with what it chooses to do, even if it is the conclusion that makes the most sense in retrospect.  In that sense, the movie is a satisfying horror ride.  It's just one with a great poker face but a mediocre hand.

The movie can be unwieldy, because this conceptual reimagination is so complicated that it requires a lot of setup and it also jumps through hoops in explaining is own mystery.  It's easy to get impatient with it, but its core is nominally effective.  Because of that, I find myself forgiving of the movie, even when it's taking to long to regain its momentum after a slowdown period.  The movie is two hours and fifteen minutes, which is an eternity for a genre that likes to keep itself tight (bonus note:  the film actually tops The Mummy Returns as the longest Mummy film).  There is always content to fill that time, but the puzzling thing is why they created a movie this complex to require it.  A basic horror movie usually requires action and reaction, which is why the majority of them keep at a constant ninety minutes, because exposition gets in the way of both.  The Mummy isn't just exposition heavy, it's mystery heavy, questing through questions that lead to more questions and finally giving answers just as the finale is about to kick in.  It gets pretty exhausting because its mystery is a drag while its horror is top-tier bleak and relentless.  The movie just can't balance the two, unlike a comparable film like Malignant, which struck a symbiotic nature between the two aspects and kept both wildly entertaining.

But it's worth checking out for horror nuts, though fans of solely the Brendan Fraser series will want to pass because it's an entirely different kind of movie.  Of all the movies that are just titled "The Mummy" (and there will be a lot more when the 1932 film hits public domain in a couple years), this one is probably third best, behind the original and 1999 adventure film.  The 1959 Hammer film has its fans, though personally I've never vibed with it, while the 2017 film speaks for itself.  And as far as Blumhouse reinventions go, it's a step above Wolf Man but is not even close to touching The Invisible Man.  I don't regret giving Cronin a chance to just get weird.  It made for some interesting viewing, if nothing else.


Normal
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Comedy, Action
Director:  Ben Wheatley
Starring:  Bob Odenkirk, Lena Headey, Henry Winkler, Reena Jolly, Brendan Fletcher, Jess McLeod


If Hot Fuzz were made with more sincerity and less irony, you'd have Normal.  Bob Odenkirk continues his evolution into aged action hero as an interim sheriff in a small, mundane town who discovers it's actually a front for the Yakuza.  Cue action scenes that are sometimes just a domino effect of violence that almost make the film half a Final Destination movie.  Despite attempting its own vibe of comedic chaos, comparisons to a beloved Edgar Wright classic are likely inevitable, and while Normal is charming and fun in its own way, it lives underneath a mighty shadow.  But redundancies have rarely actually hurt the action/comedy genre.  The question usually is whether or not it's gets the job done.  Guns go off, people explode, laughs are had, and you're in-and-out in ninety minutes.  What more can you ask of it?

Movies Still Playing At My Theater
The Drama ⭐️⭐️
Exit 8 ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Faces of Death ⭐️⭐️1/2
Hoppers ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Project Hail Mary ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
You, Me & Tuscany ⭐️⭐️

New To Digital
Alpha ⭐️⭐️1/2
Reminders of Him ⭐️⭐️
Slanted ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Undertone ⭐️⭐️⭐️

Coming Soon!

Monday, April 13, 2026

Cinema Playground Journal 2026: Week 15 (My Cinema Playground)

Multiplex Madness


Exit 8
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Horror
Director:  Genki Kawamura
Starring:  Kazunari Ninomiya, Yamato Kochi, Naru Asanuma, Kotone Hanase, Nana Komatsu


Just in case people are telling you comic book movies are flooding the market, we're now halfway through April and we've got our fifth video game adaptation of the year.  And while we're in the middle of Mario Mania, we haven't even gotten to the Mortal Kombats and the Street Fighters that 2026 has in store for us.  Most of these movies have so far have been based on brief narrative focused indie horror games, which is the origin of Exit 8.  This Japanese adaptation sees a man lost in a hallway at a subway station which keeps repeating in an infinite loop.  The only way out is to keep a sharp eye out for anomalies, some more subtle than others, and follow the walkway based upon them.  The film is sort of a puzzle, looking for oddities and knowing when the right time to move forward and backward is.  The film is also partially psychological, though its characterization is lighter than I would hope for a film with that ambition.  It's an interesting ride that sometimes threatens with monotony but still hits when it needs to.  That's enough to make it the best video game movie of the year so far, but when the competition is Iron Lung, that wasn't hard.


Faces of Death
⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre:  Horror
Director:  Daniel Goldhaber
Starring:  Barbie Ferreira, Dacre Montgomery, Josie Totah, Aaron Holliday, Jermaine Fowler, Charli XCX


I haven't seen the original Faces of Death.  I'm not sure I understood what it was back in the day because it was always described as just a series of death scenes that its audience would debate the reality of and I didn't really see the point.  I figured if I had trouble getting into the Final Destination movies, which were a series of death scenes strung together by a really stupid plot, I probably wasn't going to like a series of death scenes strung together by no plot.

The new Faces of Death is a meta reboot that actually has a storyline, this one featuring a deranged man, played by former Power Ranger Dacre Montgomery, who remakes scenes from Faces of Death by actually murdering people on camera and posting it to social media.  There are plenty of thematic elements that keep the movie interesting, from the psychological effect of social media to the desensitization and sensationalism of violence.  The film doesn't always have forward momentum in evolving its themes, but it's cool that it thought this hard about them.  The movie has a tendency to faff about to beef itself up, because it has more of a concept of an idea than a full-legth story, so it pads itself out with nonsense to try and make it a feature.  Charli XCX, for example, is in this for some reason, playing a pointless role of a bitchy coworker, which turns out to be allegorical to the movie wasting its own time.  Its commentary isn't as grand as its ambition, but it has a heart.  And it wants to expose it.  Look at that beating heart on the floor.


Hunting Matthew Nichols
⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Horror, Mockumentary
Director:  Markian Tarasiuk
Starring:  Markian Tarasiuk, Miranda McDougall


Stop me if you've heard this one:  a goup of people making a documentary get lost in the woods where spooky shit happens and they eventually find a house where spookier shit happens.  Hunting Matthew Nichols acknowledges it's ambition of being an homage to The Blair Witch Project by referencing it at several points, which is more than I can say for the similar Blair Witch knockoff House on Eden from last year.  The film also feels like it's in tune with what Chris Stuckman was trying to accomplish with Shelby Oaks but never realized.  That's not to say that Hunting Matthew Nichols is much better than either of those films, it just has some better focused elements in what it's trying to accomplish.  The movie is still a mid knockoff, but it's a watchable one.  The subject of this mockumentary is the sister who is seeking out her missing brother, uncovering questionable facts that lead her to where he disappeared.  I'd say the fatal flaw in this horror movie lies in pacing, because its a very basic faux documentary that teases a horrific mystery but only delves into actual horror in the last ten minutes.  If the fact that the movie is derivative bothers you, the film could lose your attention long before anything actually happens.  The one pro is that its cast is really good, finding a group of unknown talents who can sell clunky melodrama reasonably well.  Miranda McDougall shines in this movie, keeping attention on her with a performance that is full of conviction.  She's lost in a story we've seen done better that also feels like it's not going anywhere, but she's selling herself through the movie's dullness, which is almost an impressive feat.  Hunting Matthew Nichols isn't really worth watching but I'm glad that the talents on display at least tried to have a vehicle to work their magic.  They're succeeding in a production that's failing them.


You, Me & Tuscany
⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Comedy, Romance
Director:  Kat Coiro
Starring:  Halle Bailey, Regé-Jean Page, Marco Calvani, Aziza Scott


Halle Bailey has an almost-one-night-stand who encourages her to visit his home town of Tuscany, Italy, where she breaks into his villa after being unable to find a hotel.  When she is caught by his family, she poses as his fiancée to avoid getting arrested, though the situation complicates when she falls for his cousin.  A movie like this hinges on two things:  naturally crafting the ruse and finding reason in continuing the ruse.  If you're intentionally ignoring common sense to make both of them work, you're failing.  The set-up is pretty crap, just wanting to get the ball rolling on a comedic farce and not caring how it achieves it.  In continuing it, Bailey goes through a series of almost intentional moments of idiocy leading to misfortune that would probably make Lucille Ball think that she's gone too far in her comedic string of circumstances.  And as a comedy, the movie is just stiff and lifeless, cutting from various cutesy moments for a gag that appears to have been filmed in a vacuum on a completely different day in an entirely different location that is supposedly just to the side of the main story.  The movie seems really proud of these moments, even highlighting a few of them in closing credit outtakes, but they just make the entire ordeal feel artificial and silly.  I guess the real question is whether or not it's a solid date movie, but I'd consider it more of an inoffensive one as opposed to a good one.  Personally, it's difficult for me to consider a movie this stupid as being romantic or having sex appeal, but it's also a better Italian based romcom than Solo Mio, so it has that going for it.

Movies Still Playing At My Theater
The Drama ⭐️⭐️
Hoppers ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Project Hail Mary ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Ready or Not 2:  Here I Come ⭐️⭐️⭐️

New To Digital
The Bride! ⭐️⭐️1/2

New To Physical
I Was a Stranger ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Mercy ⭐️1/2
V/H/S/Halloween ⭐️⭐️

Coming Soon!

Monday, April 6, 2026

Cinema Playground Journal 2016: Week 14 (My Cinema Playground)

Multiplex Madness


The Drama
⭐️⭐️
Genre:  Comedy, Drama
Director:  Kristoffer Borgli
Starring:  Zendaya, Robert Pattinson


Remember that one time Robert Pattinson made a romantic drama that was secretly about 9/11?  I don't know how or why but for some reason he did it again.  In The Drama, Pattinson plays a man who is about to marry girlfriend Zendaya, only to find out her darkest secret the week before the wedding, and the film watches him try to come to terms with it as the pending nuptials loom ever so closer.  What exactly the secret is will be something I won't divulge, but I will confirm that it's pretty jarring and potentially a triggering subject, so one might want to seek out a more thorough summary if one is sensitive to more provocative subject matter.  My problem with the movie doesn't lie in the subject matter itself but rather that the movie doesn't seem to know what it's doing with it.  It's a really heavy idea to introduce into your story, while the movie's only real gain from it is that it makes the week leading up to the climactic wedding very awkward.  The movie has this presentation of wanting to put on the face of a psychological drama, but it's psychology is negligent to the point that it would be better if it were just a basic romcom with a goofier plot device setting everything into motion.  When the movie does explore psychology, it's very swift and tossed aside, choosing to focus more on Pattinson's neuroticism than Zendaya's emotional state, which feels like it should be equally, if not more, important.  I spent the entire runtime waiting for this movie to get to the point, to let me know why it's telling this specific story, because often it feels like it's message is "Conquering your demons is pointless because you'll always be judged for having them in the first place," which doesn't really justify the story it has chosen for itself.  It begins to feel like the movie's idea of being "provocative" is the same as being someone who says offensive things to be funny, when it's just a roundabout way to be an asshole.  It's just pressing buttons for the sake of pressing buttons, not bothering to understand their function.  The most frustrating thing about The Drama is that it has no reason to open its can of worms except to set up an "elevated" take on cringe comedy.  I'm sorry, movie.  You brought this up.  Using it as a prop for laughs just makes you look like you're making an ass out of yourself.


A Great Awakening
⭐️1/2
Genre:  Drama, Faith
Director:  Joshua Enck
Starring:  Jonathan  Blair, John Paul Sneed


A Great Awakening is the story of Christian George Whitefield, a preacher who befriended Benjamin Franklin and aided in unifying the colonists before the Revolutionary War.  That sounds like a movie I'd be interested in seeing, just not this particular telling of it, which is bellowing and obnoxious.  The film is at its most palatable when it's just a basic schmaltzy melodrama.  When the movie decides to dive head first into faith focused storytelling, it amps up that vibe to sensory overload, where the movie is so overbearing that it becomes uncomfortable to watch.  It does nothing with subtlety, and it's only concept of drama is having people look off into the distance.  The film mostly consists of Whitefield preaching, loudly and trashy, using the tone of his voice to emphasize the importance of religion while admirers look as if they're about to break down and cry because of it.  I guess you can consider it drama on the basis that they're trying to manipulate emotion, it's just not good drama because the manipulation is limited to a certain type of viewer.  And to be frank, the movie kinda feels like it's talking down to them, so that type of filmgoer should probably be pissed that they're being treated as if they're a toddler.  If the movie's sole ambition is to preach to the choir, then it's the best movie ever made.  If it actually thought it was insightful or dramatically powerful, then this movie is a shitshow.  That's a shame because there is a basic competency to its filmmaking that a lot of faith based media lacks.  It just utilizes it in all the wrong ways.


The Super Mario Galaxy Movie
⭐️⭐️1/2
Genre:  Fantasy, Adventure, Comedy
Director:  Aaron Horvath, Michael Jelenic
Starring:  Chris Pratt, Anya Taylor-Joy, Charlie Day, Jack Black, Keegan-Michael Key, Brie Larson, Donald Glover, Benny Safdie


I don't know if the fact that the last Mario movie was pretty much nothing but visual noise kept me in a passively curious mood for this sequel, but I actually enjoyed The Super Mario Galaxy Movie.  Personally, I liked it more than the first.  While it's just as busy as the first film, it's not as eratic and it actually follows a plot.  It also stops trying to explain the Mario universe to the audience like they're five, having a more "Just roll with it" vibe.  The Mario universe is nonsense, so it's better to just treat every corner as nonstop mayhem.  That doesn't help people who only see it as nonsense, though I think The Super Mario Galaxy Movie kinda works fluidly in that sort of classic Saturday Morning Cartoon or Japanimation vibe where the only request it asks of its viewer is a child's imagination.  It wouldn't be the first time Mario asked that of his audience.  I mean, have you seen the Super Mario Bros. Super Show?

The new movie takes place in the aftermath of previous movie, where Bowser has been defeated and Mario and Luigi are living peacefully among the Mushroom Kingdom, doing odd jobs to keep things running smoothly, which leads them to their new dinosaur buddy Yoshi.  The son of the great King of the Koopas, Bowser Jr., then takes the outerspace princess Rosalina captive, who is the lost sister Princess Peach never knew she had.  Cue adventure into the wacky galaxy, with lots of Easter eggs and cameos (including one that was spoiled the week before release, but is still fun and welcome).  A lot of the movie is fetch quest, the whole "We need to go here, but first we need to go here and do this" experience, which is what the previous movie was.  This movie didn't seem so digressive and dismissive about it, which makes the story feel more linear than last time.  It feels like the characters are moving in a straight line more and things are actually getting accomplished, so that's good.  The film leaned less into cringe humor than last time, which was also welcome, and I got a few chuckles here and there.  It's a fully pleasant experience.  Being pleasant doesn't necessarily equate being good, but I've always argued that being "bad" and being "simple" are also not the same thing.  Conversely, complexity also doesn't necessarily begat quality.  Just look a few entries above at The Drama.  That movie is complex as all hell, but it just never got its own shit together.

Flaws in the movie include its use of Bowser, which is pretty weak from start to finish.  Then there is Yoshi, who will undoubtedly be the film's biggest merchandising character, but he doesn't actually do anything in the entire movie.  Casting Donald Glover as the beloved dino isn't necessarily a flaw itself, but it's certainly is one of the most bizarre stunt castings in film history because there is no legitimate reason a brand name actor should be playing this role.  The film also, like the previous film, doesn't have much of an emotional core.  The biggest letdown of the entire movie is the idea of Peach finding a family she never knew she had and the movie doesn't really lean into that.  Rosalina is more of a McGuffin than someone Peach has any real emotional connection to.  And finally, for a movie based on the game Super Mario Galaxy, it feels less epic and grand scale than you'd expect from an intergalactic adventure.  There are memorable setpieces, the movie is just less "big" than I would have liked.

However, I think of the three Mario movies that have been made thusfar (including the Bob Hoskins/John Leguizamo classic), I'd say Galaxy might be the best one.  The 1993 film is arguably the most fascinating movie of the bunch, but of the goals each movie set for themselves, Galaxy was the one that came closest to accomplishing them.  I'd say that's a level up.

Movies Still Playing At My Theater
GOAT ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Hoppers ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Project Hail Mary ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Ready or Not 2:  Here I Come ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Reminders of Him ⭐️⭐️
They Will Kill You ⭐️⭐️
Undertone ⭐️⭐️⭐️

New To Digital
Avatar:  Fire and Ash ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Dolly ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Pillion ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2
Scream 7 ⭐️⭐️
Wuthering Heights ⭐️⭐️1/2

New To Physical
Marty Supreme ⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2

Coming Soon!